What is the logic behind a magazine restriction?

Strange how you do not like raising taxes until it favors outlandish Fantastical Gun Control.

 

I never said I was completely against raising taxes. I am against doubling my taxes

 

Let us then only Double your taxes.

 

Thank you for your opinion

 

Mental health treatment can be funding to whatever degree, but it will do no good if those in need to do actually seek out the case they are in need of.

Beyond such, what good is mental health treatment to someone who knows what they are doing is wrong, but simply does not care one way or another?

- - - Updated - - -

do not use the "do anything possible" argument unless you wish for it to be taken to the logical conclusion. If we should do anything possible to stop something, such as motor vehicle accidents, that should include a complete and total prohibition on all motor vehicles everywhere, because no motor vehicles means no more motor vehicle accidents. If you argue against such steps, then you are arguing that certain actions simply should not be on the table.

 

You confuse anything with anything possible. Silly conclusions can be easily dismissed

 

why is 15 mph legal in a school zone, but not 16?

 

When did driving become a protected right?

 

When We were granted the Right to travel freely throughout the Country free from unreasonable and undue stops and searches and seizures secure in our personal effects etc.....

 

Right to travel has nothing to do with the mode of transportation.

 

careful, owning a gun is a protected right, not owning the ammo, someday like cigarettes, those my be taxed sky high

we need a new law that taxes can never be more they 50% the cost of the product

.

 

Yes it does, just as free speech can take many forms, pen & paper and Internet etc,
The Right to travel is also for Disabled people to include access to bus and train by virtue of the ADA that I personally had a hand in promoting and passing.

A mode of transportation is relevant to the Right to travel, it has been Regulated under the guise of public safety, however it can never be banned outright as a privilege could.

 

Ammo is also protected.

 

Are you attempting to now claim that the united states government has absolutely no authority to completely prohibit and outlaw all motor vehicles in the country? They cannot restrict them to a degree greater than they are currently? They can do nothing at all?

Just as factual conclusions can be easily dismissed by those who are here for their own entertainment, rather than for the purpose of engaging in open, honest, and legitimate debates. You have yet to present anything but trash.

 

In Army Basic, our M-1 Garands only held 8 rounds. It makes no sense to limit magazines.

The general idea we need to strive for is no shots at all fired at civilians.

Democrats work on guns when they need to work on killer types.

 

What law are you talking about? And you know by now Democrats put laws on the books to cover most everything there is.

First I go with the silly laws.

[video=youtube;-e4gS7fKbXk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e4gS7fKbXk[/video]

Then since 1950

[video=youtube;p5-5a6Q54BM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5-5a6Q54BM&t=2s[/video]

 

the death sentence or life without parole seems to be rather substantive actions dealing with murder.

- - - Updated - - -

50% tax on ammo would be unconstitutional. politicians who would try to impose such a tax should be tried for treason

 

You are free to leave at anytime. You sound very frustrated. Maybe this thread is just not for you

 

Open, honest, and legitimate debate will not be drowned out by those who cannot post beyond "I disagree" when they do not like at they hear from those who have far more knowledge and experience to speak from. You cannot demonstrate why you disagree, only that you disagree, which amounts to nothing.

 

You are very angry. When you calm down you may be better able to engage in honest debate

 

Please provide your math that proves that fighting recidivism doubles your taxes. You completely made that up. Your proposals, if enforced would raise taxes just as much.

 

I see nothing that reflects anger in his post. What part sounds angry to you? Your post sounds like you have no legitimate rebuttal though.

 

I await your evidence as well. Clearly double is an estimate. Who knows what each side would cost. But building prisons and keeping prisoners is very expensive

- - - Updated - - -

Thank you for your opinion

 

There is room at the federal level. We can cut waste spending that we all know is prevalent. The money is there if we want to get serious. There is no evidence that your proposals to enforce gun control would be any less expensive, unless you won't be punishing those that break your proposed laws.

 

Ok you make a fair argument. I welcome many ways to reduce gun violence. Yours and mine