What kind of women are sluts?

Good work.

Maybe they were afraid of women, had no morals, did nothing but "work" (we have all worked with men, they're not known for hard graft) and stand about trying to say how great they were.

However, women who don't want to have to work for a living would probably support the majority of what such men said. Men don't see it, but as long as they subscribe to this attitude, women who don't mind being degraded can live off men in perpetuity.

It might be equally valid to ask how women convinced men monogamy has value. To the extent that men stand about bragging and thinking they have freedom (let's face it, most talk a good game but don't have the balls or ability to engage with another woman outside marriage) while handing in the money every payday and doing whatever the wife directs.

 

You feminists obviously don't get it.

All primate males, including humans, have a genetic code which predisposes us to a natural distaste of promiscuity in women. Why?

Becuase we have to know that we won't be saddled with investing resources in another males genetics. That's why.

In lower primates, males will KILL an infant they know is not their own.

All we human males ask is we're not forced by law to provide for the offspring of another male outside the relationship.

You feminists want complete and total sexual freedom, including the freedom to force a man to take care of a child that is not genetically related to him whether he chooses to do so or not.

We men choose sexually inexperienced females for long term mates becuase those women have the least liklihood to cuckold us.

When single, we will gladly screw the promiscuous female, but we'll never, ever settle down with her permanently because her promiscuity is always a threat of cuckoldry.

 

Yeah right. Take responsibility for your own issues. Women are as entitled as men to sleep around and they are entitled not to be regarded as less than men for doing the same thing as men.

You see when you were being programmed with your genetic code there, to have a natural distaste of women in order to avoid being cuckolded? Why didn't your genetics programme you not to shag every woman you see?

If your genetics (I understand, you're not responsible for your own actions) could programme you all not to sleep around, none of you would be cuckolded.

If your genetics could also programme in some ethics, you would see that sleeping around is cuckolding.

 

Nature doesn't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about your morals and ethics. Don't blame me for the double standard that MOTHER nature saddled you with.

You are entitled to have sex as much as you want with who you want, but you are not entitled to change the social opinion of men for you doing it.

By all means, slut away. I love sluts. But don't cry about the consequences, we men don't owe you a (*)(*)(*)(*) thing, including social respect for promiscuity.

"Social Constructs" don't just spring out of the ground unbidden. They are deeply tied to genetics.

 

Yeah, I get it perfectly fine you’re a male with derogatory views of women.

Oh, look: Prime hypocrite and LOON suggesting promiscuity is fine for men and not for women. (*)(*)(*)(*)ed in the head notions alive and well in 2012!! Who knew?

So stop screwing around and your problem solved. Make sure you’re protected, wear a rubber and stop whining.

Plenty of women wouldn’t touch a promiscuous male with a ten foot pole. Particularly wouldn’t touch the slimy, angry, no-hoper one’s. When it comes to settling down, it pays a woman to watch any prospective male from a long distance away and with a very cautious eye… in any eventuality she may have the misfortune to hook up with a sexist hypocrite - as witnessed right here!!

 

The ground has shifted since those days. The days of insensibility. Times have changed, but we see certain men still dragging a hypocritical sexist bag of tricks around with them. No decent, self-possessed woman would look sideways at them.

Imagine being shackled to a sexist dickhead for even a minute: “Oh, yes, dearest darling, that’s fine you have a promiscuous past and shagged the fence-pole, too… of course, of course, that’s fine, you’re a man. Um… look darling, I um… well, um, I slept with 3 men in my past… I pray to God in heaven that wouldst be all right for you, my dearest. Please say it is okay I slept with 3 men in my time… By the way, dearest, I hope your dick hasn’t fallen off from overuse… or still has leftover splinters from the fence-pole. You know, on second thought, I see that ye are not worthy of me. You are used merchandise. I will get me a man who whose dick is chaste!!”

 

All bluster and no substance. Goes with the territory of sexist males.

Bluster on...

Fortunately your attitude is in the minority. Aside from at forums like this that attract a number of whiny men.

No doubt women are getting on with it, cos you don't see too many women here whining like little children trying to make men fit "their notions" of how men should be. It's pretty pathetic to see this stuff in action.

If you're not a woman, then be a man, and mind your own business.

 

I admit I find it hard to believe that anyone could think it okay for a man to be promiscuous but not think it okay for a woman to be promiscuous.

It was said right here on this thread.

It's pathetic. And loopy.

If a person doesn't like someone else being promiscuous, then they shouldn't be promiscuous themselves.

Startling, breathtaking hypocrisy. Disingenuous crap.

If you don't approve of someone else doing something, but you do it yourself, then you are an utter dunderhead and disingenuous and don't have any right to call yourself authentic and of good character.

Cannot believe the utter useless bull(*)(*)(*)(*) people post here.

 

it's not OK.
But, that doesn't make a slut, not a slut, unless of course you prescribe to the "two wrongs make a right" line of reasoning.

 

Maybe this will shed some light on the matter.


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/slut

 

Oh...I wrote a huge reply to this and the forum went offline and lost the post. Now I can't be bothered rewriting it. So you're wrong about everything. The end.

LMAO... but use of that terminology is sexist in itself.

Yes, yes I am. And I have. Men have been conditioned to think that way. They are now being reconditioned because it doesn't suit most women to have you think that way any more. You're probably a bit long in the tooth to be reconditioned, but your offspring will be the next step. Stepford men the lot of you, whatever you want to believe you think.

What consequences? Women don't care about men like that anymore.

No, they aren't. It suited some women to live off you. They convinced you of a certain perception. Now, women want things different and you all have already agreed to the concept of independent females. You've written it into law. You work and hand in your money and the women don't even have to be servants for the short period of time you are in the house after you've worked your ass off all day for them.

Women run rings around men and always have. If we want you to change the way you think, you will be doing that. Whenever we say you will.

 

"Change"? 'Change' in what way? To stop being a serial cheater? Ain't gonna happen just b/c the wife tells him to stop. Like drug addiction, alcoholism, a guy would have to want to change his ways, not b/c he's told to..... wouldn't life be so much simpler if it was that easy and a lot less divorces.......

Like Tiger Woods, some men are sex addicts and the more, the merrier....

 

you can take away our beards, but you'll never take away our freeeeedooom!!!

 

Sigh...hardly even worth engaging as I know you won't get anything I post. However, how many women do you think would tell a man to stop? If you were in that position you might. I wouldn't be in that position.

 

Is that the best you can come up with? You're slippin. I had a conversation with the husband of a good friend of mine. He's a bit of an old whinger for sure, but he was badmouthing my friend about this and that and I had to stop him. This was a simple matter. I just pointed out his wife, like many wives, is the worst woman in the world to hear him talk and that will change instantly the second she decides it will. I.e. he is whining and (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)ing there and when she decides, all she has to do it look him in the eye and he starts gibbering. You all are easy.

 

i was pressed for time.

that's what she said!

 

*Sigh!* Well, golly gee, Viv ... you sez:

Women run rings around men and always have. If we want you to change the way you think, you will be doing that. Whenever we say you will.

It's hard to tell sometimes w/some posters if they're talking in riddles, don't mean a thing they're saying or are serious.... and since this is a rather serious topic, I assumed you were serious when you said the above..... my mistake.

I'll make a memo to myself that Viv doesn't say what she means and doesn't mean what she says....... would that work?

And no, I wasn't in that position, but knew some women who were - some ended up divorced. One stuck it out and lived a miserable life.

 

Not for you. Whatever any of that means. I knew it was a mistake to respond.

Who said you were in that position?

I know one extraordinary woman whose husband lived in a different country, but she insisted on remaining married. She was seriously depressed and had been to the doctor for help. She was very fragile, the obvious...your husband is an arse and you need to divorce him and bankrupt him (yes bankrupt him) forthwith in order to regain your self respect...didn't seem appropriate as she spoke about suicidal tendencies. This woman was really proud of remaining married. She really thought it was an achievement. 100% he wanted rid of her, but knew if he divorced her she would die. They had children. He cared about them and that was her leverage.

 

The obvious implication here is that it would have been appropriate if she hadn't been so fragile - which you surely realize is pure insanity. Right?

 

clarify

 

I need to explain why revenge can never be anything but detrimental to the self-respect of the one who craves it? Really?

 

Yeah, I know what you mean by responding...... but.....

A woman & mother who chooses to live in a black world of depression and suicidal tho'ts over a guy or for any reason isn't exactly an 'extraordinary' woman in my book.......

To stay w/a guy who doesn't want you, will never be faithful to you isn't remarkable in any way but trying to look like a martyr .... "looky me and see how I'm suffering...." and there's kids involved in this sickness. That's the real sadness of marriages like that......

 

The kind of women dat go after other womens' husbands...

... `specially dem rich widows dat use their money to lure husbands away from their wives `cause the wives are younger an' ain't got money to compete from a dead husband...

... insteada using their money to help their own family.

 

Yeah actually you do need to explain that because there is a lot of game psychology that says you are better off if things seem fair all the way around - in this case the "revenge" might simply be balancing the books to BE fair

 

You need to seek legal recourse against whoever did this to your mind.