What life is like for Paul Manafort in jail

Here's hoping that sooner rather than later you find out that supporting or working for Trump doesn't allow you to commit felonies.

 

He has been enslaved and imprisoned. At least there is no longer any danger that he is preparing any defense. But, then, it was already decided he has NO right to any trial and has been summarily convicted and imprisoned without any trial or any right to a jury.

 

So your defense of Trump being owned by Russians is a Conspiracy theory that Obama was owned by Russians?

 

It's a conspiracy theory that trump is owned by the Russians. Why are you partial to one but not the other. Especially because one has an actual video recording of Obama being "flexible" towards the head of the Russian government.

 

We hear and read some openly claiming they support any crime, even murder, any harm to any number of people, destruction of the economy, to erase Democracy, the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights all to get rid of President Trump and turn the government over to an international super rich fascist oligarchy.

 

Trump owned by the Russians?

Obama and Clinton both essential are Russian agents, as is Podesta.

 

even attemp
Well, no one has to worry about him putting on any defense since even attempting to do so is such a great crime no trial is even necessary for immediate conviction and imprisonment.

 

Obvious you don't know how to use Wikipedia and never or ignore Wikipedia's "Disclaimers."


Always always always go to the Wiki "Talk Page" and only use Wikipedia as a starting point for further research.

There are 18 pages to read and it's longer than the Wikipedia topic page "Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections"

Wikipedia:General disclaimer

WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY
Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia; that is, a voluntary association of individuals and groups working to develop a common resource of human knowledge. The structure of the project allows anyone with an Internet connection to alter its content. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information.

That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in Wikipedia; much of the time you will. However, Wikipedia cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here. The content of any given article may recently have been changed, vandalized or altered by someone whose opinion does not correspond with the state of knowledge in the relevant fields... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer



USE WIKIPEDIA AT YOUR OWN RISK
PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ANY INFORMATION YOU MAY FIND IN WIKIPEDIA MAY BE INACCURATE, MISLEADING, DANGEROUS, ADDICTIVE, UNETHICAL OR ILLEGAL.

Some information on Wikipedia may create an unreasonable risk for readers who choose to apply or use the information in their own activities or to promote the information for use by third parties.

None of the authors, contributors, administrators, vandals, or anyone else connected with Wikipedia, in any way whatsoever, can be responsible for your use of the information contained in or linked from these web pages.

Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that information you receive from Wikipedia is correct and has been verified. Check the references at the end of the article. Read the article's talk page and revision history to see if there are outstanding disputes over the contents of the article. Double-check all information with independent sources.

If an article contains suggestions regarding dangerous, illegal or unethical activities, remember that anyone can post this information on Wikipedia. The authors may not be qualified to provide you with complete information or to inform you about adequate safety precautions and other measures to prevent injury, or other damage to your person, property or reputation. If you need specific advice (for example, medical, legal, financial, marital or risk management) please seek a professional licensed or knowledgeable in that area.

Wikipedia is not uniformly peer reviewed; while readers may correct errors or remove erroneous suggestions, they have no legal duty to do so. All information found on the site is without any implied warranty of fitness for any purpose or use whatsoever.

No consequential damages can be sought against Wikipedia, as it is a voluntary association of individuals formed to create freely licensed online educational, cultural and informational resources. This information is being given to you gratuitously and there is no agreement or understanding between you and Wikipedia regarding your use or modification of this information beyond the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).

DO NOT RELY UPON ANY INFORMATION FOUND IN WIKIPEDIA WITHOUT INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Risk_disclaimer




WIKIPEDIA CONTAINS CONTENT THAT MAY BE OBJECTIONABLE
In its encyclopedic function, Wikipedia contains millions of articles on a vast array of topics. A relatively small fraction of these topics are frequently censored by educational, governmental, corporate, parental, and other filtering schemes.

• Some Wikipedia articles discuss words or language that are considered profane, vulgar, or offensive by some readers. See Wikipediarofanity for more information.
• Articles may contain audio, visual, or written representations of people or events which may be protected by some cultures.
• Wikipedia contains many different images and videos, some of which are considered objectionable or offensive by some readers. For example, some articles contain graphical depictions of violence, human anatomy, or sexual acts.
• Many articles contain frank discussion of controversial topics. Some subjects that are discussed have criminal applications in some jurisdictions. Others contain information on dangerous or otherwise risky activities (see Wikipedia:General disclaimer and Wikipedia:Risk disclaimer).
• Wikipedia contains spoilers.
• Wikipedia may contain triggers for people with post-traumatic stress disorder and Trump Derangement Syndrome.
• Wikipedia may contain images and videos which can trigger epileptic seizures and other medical conditions.
• Since Wikipedia is open to contributions from the public, there may at any time be vandalism present on Wikipedia.
• There may be medical, legal or other information that is normally also the subject of professional opinions; Wikipedia is not a substitute for seeking the help of a professional. Please note: Wikipedia does not give legal advice or medical advice.

Wikipedia's current policy is to include such content, provided it breaches neither any of our existing policies (especially Neutral point of view) nor the laws of the United States, where Wikipedia is hosted. See a list of controversial issues for some examples of articles that may contain such content. None of these articles contain warnings.

In any case, Wikipedia is a work in progress, and many articles contain errors, bias, or duplication, or may simply need tender loving care. We encourage readers to help us fix these problems. The great majority of articles are written primarily or solely by individuals who are not subject matter experts, and may lack academic or professional credentials in the area.

Wikipedia contains obscure information that would not be covered in a conventional encyclopedia. Wikipedia's coverage is based on the interests of its volunteer contributors. Readers should not judge the importance of topics based on their coverage in Wikipedia, nor assume that a topic is important merely because it is the subject of a Wikipedia article.

See also: Wikipedia:Verifiability.

 

Is that not what Mueller is tasked to do and was there not enough grounds for Rosenstein to appoint a SC? BTW, I notice you eliminated "if" from your quote of what I posted and then asked for proof, what are you two YsO or just desperate? And you referenced Obama not I........
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.1

 

For eight years Obama gave Vladimir Putin every thing Putin wanted.
That's why Putin had no respect for Obama.
While most of the world leaders played chess on the geopolitical chessboard, Obama played checkers.
Putin always wants a challenge.

 

Translation: Since other news sources do not conform to my world view, I seek out those that keep me safely tucked inside my conservative bubble.

 

So as of the American legal standard trump is innocent, not only that but as of this comment there is no proof either. You'd look much less biased of you admitted the fact outright.

 

Is the Mueller investigation over? What are you afraid of again? That Trump is a RU puppet POTUS?

 

I didn't know Putin wanted all those sanctions.

 

So why again Vlad was so scared of Billary?

 

No. Did I say it was? Why do you keep asking about if I'm afraid? I answered you already. I'm just reminded you that trump is considered by the government innocent as we speak. So I'm not sure why you are posting comments that are asserting his guilt.

Actually I think I am sure, it's because you are blatantly partisan or biased.

 

And neither did all of the Americans who were affected by those sanctions.

 

Trump and his campaign are under criminal investigation, the desire to paint me with partizanship is merely desperate & needy. Why again are you so afraid of the GOP appointed Mueller investigation into Trump? Why not wait for the results?

 

When was he found guilty of witness tampering?

 

Crooked Hillary is a warmonger liberal.

Liberal Democrats and neocon RINO's love war.

 

So you agree that Putin was very afraid of Billary being POTUS?

 

Like Trump who relies on money from Russian Spy Agencies to keep his financial house of Cards from collapsing.

 

He was under house arrest, and evidence arose that he may not have adhered to the conditions of which had been set by the court, and house arrest has been revoked.

This happens all the time. House arrest was a courtesy bestowed upon him by the court. He took advantage of that courtesy and has now suffered the consequences of doing so.

 

Verdad!!!!

 

Putin isn't scared.

But I'm guessing you don't know why we are at where we are today.

If you haven't watched it...watch it and you'll understand the "Putin Revenge."

FRONTLINE tells the story of how Russian President Vladimir Putin came to see the United States as an enemy — and why he decided to target an American .