What race do you think Ancient Egypt was?

Which Bible verses says they were black?

 

Ethiopia and Egypt are brothers according to scripture. That is all you need to know the.bibleforbids idol worship and will not state precisely that "Israel was a Blackman" lmao this is idolatry. Muslims took it far by blowing sphinx nose off and Arabs rob temples, taking it to extremes but they relay a message the Israelites promote. Cannot scriptural ly state will not but use metaphor

 

Bible table of nations is a lie.

 

Translated:
Genesis table of nations is Afrocentric

And here we have a winner , scripture is Afrocentric

Fair enough

I'm happy with that analysis

 

The current thinking is that the Sphinx was an Anubis and the nose part fell off naturally... and it was later carved into a face.

Ancient Ethiopia is sort of a vague location... in antiquity is encompassed parts of Arabia and Yemen.. Certainly doesn't mean that they were all black.. nor were the Hurrians, Hittites, Hyksos or Black Sea people.

- - - Updated - - -

Genesis Table of Nations is nonsense... You believe in Noah's Ark and all that Sumerian mythos?

 

The body is clearly that of a lion. John Anthony West came up with the theory that the original head of the Sphinx was that of a lion and that the Sphinx eroded over time then the head was carved again into a human head.

[video=youtube;SbUsGnMUH2Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbUsGnMUH2Y[/video]


There is a historical account of the Sphinx's nose being demolished by a radical Sufi because citizens were worshiping at its feet.

http://www.catchpenny.org/nose.html

 

Fact is scripture has Egypt and ethiopiakush as brothers and its conceded that genesis is Afrocentric it's all good and vindicated on my part thanks

 

Genesis is not Afrocentric.

 

Meaning: This is factually correct but I don't like it.

 

There's nothing correct about it. It's just racist propaganda.

 

The Egyptians being Black is also racist propaganda. The only difference is my one is factually accurate.

 

The ancient Egyptians being Black is factually accurate and not racist propaganda.

 

Meaning you use Black which is a synonym of the valid ancestry/similarity taxon Negroid to claim Egyptians were Black, then deny its trivial validity when someone points out Blacks have low IQs.

 

I've already shown that Negroid is not a valid taxon and I don't avoid the usage of Black when talking about IQs.

 

Of course you didn't. You said some physical classifications (unspecified) don't match ancestral/genetic ones so all classification of humans is invalid. This is like denying taxonomy because of dolphins. It's pseudoscientific PC (incorrect) race denial.

 

I did specify how racial classification in general was invalid. It's not pseudoscientific or politically correct to reject biological races, it's scientifically correct. Racialism is politically motivated.

 

So having Alexandria doesn't denote you're in a crossroads? Now you just have to have major routes on all sides, and none can be sea routes?

Doesn't the game become difficult when you're lugging those goalposts all over the field

 

technically, water isn't a road. That's not a goalpost. That's just nature. Kind of like man can do nothing about the fact Israel is part of the afrikan landmass and not Asian.

 

Irrelevant garbage not worth responding to, as always.

 

LOL.. Water isn't a road... Oh God.. How convoluted can you get? An island isn't a road either, but Dilmun was also a cross road..

 

Israel is not on the African Plate.. Its part of the Jordan Rift Valley of the Arabian Plate.

 

When studying Ancient Egypt racial studies, how can I tell if the sources im reading are accurate, or just biased? This topic isnt just something that people like us are academically interested in-a lot of people who study it have agendas.

 

Exactly. EJ is a Black advocate. Not a scientist. If I'm banned for that so be it. Shame on you, not me.

 

You have to look at the credentials of the people doing the study. Sources gathered by personal webpages and blogs for instance are probably made by people who have agendas. My primary source is Dr. Shomarka Keita, a Biological Anthropologist who studied at Oxford University and has conducted a lot of studies on ancient Egypt. You can look him up (refer back to my first post in the thread). He has the necessary credentials to study this topic. His research builds on that of other scholars. I have found him to be nothing more than an objective scientist. I've emailed him several times myself to make sure I am interpreting his work correctly and he has confirmed that I am.

I am an Egalitarian (pro-equality) who combats racism as a hobby on the internet. You are a racist with an agenda who denies the Ancient Egyptians are Black because you can't accept that Blacks built an advanced civilization. If you deny this we can look in to your post history to confirm it as a fact. Combating racism and correcting the African historical record does not make me a Black advocate. I'm here to tell the truth.

 

I don't have any problem with blacks having built a sophisticated civilization, but I don't see any evidence beyond the several Nubian Pharaohs that Egypt was black. The art they left behind doesn't reflect that.

However there are lots of Pyramids in Sudan .. the Meroe civilization I think it was called...

How is that considered racism?