White House Panics Over Popularity of Socialism

Well, that's certainly not a totality.

 

If it was up to me we would have zero foreign immigration. You'll get no argument from me on that.

 

Are you so sure?

 

Yeah, like I said, you can certainly find examples of corruption... or flat out bad policy.

 

^ Thread win.

 

There are too many examples where I lose count easily.

 

The White House panicked? All good Americans should panic. This nation was founded on, and became successful from AVOIDING SOCIALISM! Our economic engine, Capitalism, is an answer on the citizen test for all new migrants. Only a fool that does not understand human nature and math would support Socialism.

Those that read Marx and understood it laughed, those that did not followed it. It's evil to the human spirit.

 

Socialism does not allow people to "crawl out of poverty", it LOCKS them into poverty and dependency on the Government for life. It's evil.

 

First you say welfare is a shakedown. (give us money or we revolt violently)

then you seem to rejoice in people being "well fed and housed peasants".

What If I wont stand for a shakedown, OR peasants here?

All men are created equal.

And I hold this truth self evident.

 

What the heck is "reviewing loan programs to make vocational school cheaper"?

The only thing the Trump administration has done is to make sure that vocation school owners can ensure those schools students still get to be screwed!

Thanks, Trump!

 

Everyone screws students.

And it infuriates me.

We need to lower the barriers for entry.

 

This country was also built upon trade unions, good paying jobs, and industrialism all of which has either been destroyed or outsourced.

Now we have a majority of temp jobs, part time jobs, and low income jobs, we're suppose to make America great again with all of that? Lots of luck!

 

There's a difference between social public welfare that pays people to stay at home like some kind of locked up caged animal that rewards laziness which is today's present corporate model of subsidizing its workforce through government money so they don't have to raise wages versus an active social public welfare system that invests directly in its citizens future concerning job training, education, job placement, and so on that rewards hard work or study.

I don't understand why libertarians and neo conservatives can't figure this out.

News flash: You can't have a prosperous national economy if you reduce forty five percent of your population into poverty and then kick them in the ass while they're down calling them all worthless. It won't work and it is unrealistic to think it ever will.

 

Dat moment welfare is "active" and corporations are "stay at home".

 

???

 

It's quite simple and the early American colonists understood this with the corrupt decadent ruler of king George III.

You either as a state government create conditions where a large majority of your population lives well concerning living standards or if you don't you have a violent revolution, insurrection, and bloody coup. Once again, this isn't something very difficult to understand.

 

Be careful with that kind of talk in utilizing state intervention into corrupt overcharging wealthy private universities or schools, you might break the delicate balance of the free market!

That's socialist crazy talk!

 

Carl owns teh thread.

 

Socialism popular? There will always be those that want to take your money instead of working to improve their own lives.

It’s human nature to be lazy.

 

Yeap, been there, seen it. I wonder why are all these feces invested cities are Democrat sanctuary strongholds?

 

Ah yes... I wonder how can Australia afford it and we can't? Could this be one of the reasons?

In 2017, 3.5 million refugees around the world had their status recognised or were successfully resettled. Of those, 23,111 (0.65%) were assisted by Australia.

A whopping 0.65%, eh? No wonder you people have all these money, you don't need to spend on Illegal Aliens...

 

Why haven't any of you socialists moved to a socialist country yet?

 

What? The mega corporations pretty much have a free labor workforce when it concerns low wages and subsidies from the government in the form of public welfare for low wage earners.

If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander.

Are you saying "free stuff or labor" is good for the mega corporations only?

 

Read up on it. Hes MAGA one move at a time.

 

I actually want to move to Norway or Iceland but I'm too broke to leave.

Do you have an additional $100,000.00 to spare? If so I'll set up a PayPal.