White Man Visits A Black Republic

Let's face it, even before colonialism Africa was dirty and primitive. That's why white Europeans conquered the continent so easily. Even the "great black empires" weren't technologically advanced. They just had extensive trade routes. So why do blacks always blame Africa's poverty on whites? Africa has always been very primitive.

 

What does disease matter? They did well during the plague. HIV infects any race, and only affects blacks more because it started in Africa and black people live there and tend to sleep with other black people then white people.

Back to the subject, doesn't Botswanas economic growth despite such natural problems support my argument?

 

You are trying to make this 'personal' that is a violation of board rules....it is easy to play that game and it is played on many message boards which always has the same result....chaos...everyone calling each other names which makes an intelligent discussion impossible.

 

http://www.voanews.com/content/questions-abound-over-growth-statistics-in-africa/1656371.html

 

Its a relevant question. You are basically calling blacks inferior. If you are going to be so insulting---you can at least man up and stop manipulating rules to avoid questions. That is the way of a coward.

Can you call someone black a friend and still have this attitude? Can someone have worked with black people and admired them as co-workers and still have the attitude of your op?

 

Of course they can, it is a macro versus micro distinction. Retarded people are not on equal footing with normal people, but that doesn't mean you hate them or would refuse to be friendly with them. I understand why The Devil won't answer directly and I myself am speaking in general terms.

 

Exactly...You nailed it.

 

Anybody who says such a thing has NOT had sufficient normal experiences. Casual politeness is not what I'm talking about.

I'm sorry, but this whole thread of takers that think they are superior is simply ignorant arrogant people talking.

- - - Updated - - -

You can't even answer a straight out question without threatening reporting someone. I think it was nailed but not in what you are thinking.

I don't get disgusted easily---but people worshiping themselves and thinking God made them superior is getting a little wearing. I'll let you talk yourself up now in peace.

 

OP, did you say take a "safer" trek down South??? Do you mean South U.S.?
If you do, I have news for you. There is nothing safe about the "hoods".
There have been people who have taken wrong turns off the main hi-way winding up in one of those "hoods" and getting killed.
There are "no-go" zones all over the US and Europe where non-white folk live.

Why is that?

 

A fascinating befuddling question, OZ. I assume there are also such "no go" areas that are white majority?

 

and another one bites the dust.....bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Why is that liberals have so much trouble defending their position? As soon as their fallacious argument begins to deflate.....they head for the hills. heh heh

As has been said several times....this board needs a better class of liberal...some that are at least intellectually honest.

 

Because the Africans can't help themselves and we can't help them either.
They will always be bloodthirsty and destructive. All we should say about African self-genocide is "So, what else is new?"

 

I believe somebody asked what black majority countries were doing well.

From my knowledge almost every island is doing well. According to the HDI thing, the Bahamas and Barbados (both over 80% black) have the highest HDI's in the Americas. I think the Bahamas has the highest GDP in the Americas. Bermuda (also over 80% black) is said to have the highest GPD in the World. As I stated earlier, their was an international embargo placed on Haiti after the revolution. That would kind of suck, I assume. Moving on to Africa, I think Botswana has been mentioned. Namibia, Ethiopia, Angola, Kenya, Ghana, and Rwanda, yes Rwanda have growth rates that other countries could only dream of. I guess South Africa doesn't "count", but Nigeria is going to have a top 20 economy by the end of the decade, so technically Nigeria is also light years ahead of South Africa (their are several more that probably should be on that list, but you get the point). Meanwhile in Greece..

 

Don't forget the caymans. They got past wealth envy a long time ago and don't tax it. They are moving faster upward as a result of not taxing investments then we are taxing them. Turns out wealth sitting in your country's banks is better for the people then sitting in government coffers.

 

So the Serbs couldn't help themselves? We should have left them to their ethnic cleansing and rape camps? As soon as you start blaming the race instead of the culture, you are a racist. My motto is "there's nothing wrong with a racist a good boot to the head can't cure". Racism is a common and pernicious human condition that does as much harm to the racist as it does to the race being put down.

 

That's your retort, ElDiablo? You offer no evidence that the criminal pack behavior in question is race-based rather than culture-based. I do agree with you that too much of the media bends over backward not to mention the race of criminals in such incidents and that is indeed counterproductive. LIberals who squeeze their eyes tightly shut in order not to look at very real and widespread social problems are little better than racists who want to stick the race in question on reservations somewhere.

 

There is proof to that too. The south grew faster economically after slavery and did again after civil rights then it did before in democrat slave states and in the democrat Jim Crowe south.

 

If there are, I have never heard of them, have you?
==========================
CWK - Who exactly said they thought themselves superior?
You are making things up.

 

Come to think of it, no. Gee, how weird.

 

Race and culture cannot be separated.


At a time when the self-declared enemies of the white race

define themselves in racial terms, only our own definition of ourselves

in those terms can meet their challenge. If and when that challenge

should triumph and those enemies come to kill us as the Tutsi people

have been slaughtered in Rwanda, they will do so not because we are

“Westerners” or “Americans” or “Christians” or “conservatives” or

“liberals” but because we are white.

Secondly, we need to assert a specifically racial identity

because race is real — biological forces, including those that determine

race, are important for social, cultural, and historical events. I do

not suggest that race as a biological reality is by itself sufficient to

explain the civilization of European man — if race were sufficient,

there would be no problem — but race is necessary for it, and it is

likely that biological science in the near future will show even more

clearly how necessary racial, biological, and genetic explanations are

to understanding social and historical events more fully.

The civilization that we as whites created in Europe and

America could not have developed apart from the genetic endowments of

the creating people, nor is there any reason to believe that the

civilization can be successfully transmitted to a different people. If

the people or race who created and sustained the civilization of the

West should die, then the civilization also will die. A merely cultural

consciousness, then, that emphasizes only social and cultural factors as

the roots of our civilization is not enough, because a merely cultural

consciousness will not by itself conserve the race and people that were

necessary for the creation of the culture and who remain necessary for

its survival. We need not only to understand the role of race in

creating our civilization but also to incorporate that understanding in

our defense of our civilization. Until we do so, we can expect only to

keep on losing the war we are in…

As long as whites continue to avoid and deny their own racial

identity, at a time when almost every other racial and ethnic category

is rediscovering and asserting its own, whites will have no chance to

resist their dispossession and their eventual possible physical

destruction. Before we can seriously discuss any concrete proposals for

preserving our culture and its biological and demographic foundations,

we have to address and correct the problem we inflict on ourselves, our

own lack of a racial consciousness and the absence of a common will to

act in accordance with it.........Sam Francis

 

What question am I avoiding? You seem to have a basic misunderstanding of the rules governing this board(which are enforced off and on) attack the message not the poster. Anyone who has been on many message boards knows all too well that when 'personal attacks' are allowed what happens.

You have never seen me calling blacks inferior...I merely point out and report their behavior....if you consider such behavior to be inferior --then you should take it up with the negroes...do not attack the messenger.

You remain in violation of the rules of the board.

 

For Clarification....Board Rule #4----Personal Attacks:

ATTACK THE MESSAGE, NOT THE MESSENGER - Any statement directed at or about another member of Political Forum that is derogatory in nature will be considered a 'Personal Attack'.

Now tell me how I am manipulating the rules?

 

Ten points for your sanctimonious mumblings of moral superiority. Another ninety points and you'll win a halo to float over your swollen head.

 

So you tell us.....what is wrong with Negroid Culture?

- - - Updated - - -

BTW I wonder if the Jews of Europe would have preferred reservations or what they got?

 

The moment they took it over Europeans enforced embargoes on them and they had to pay France back for the slaves (they France) lost after their (the slaves) revolution. Go figure http://www.iacenter.org/haiti/embargoes.htm