Why Hillary Clinton is unfit to be President......

A weak dictator? Aren't those at odds with each other? Is he a dictator (who by definition holds absolute power) or weak (who presumably holds none due to weakness)? A weak dictator is like a cold flame, or a straight circle, or a smart republican. You're seriously contemplating the merits of how Putin would do as dictator of the US? You think congress would keep him in check? Do you ever read what you post?

 

He trys but SCOTUS keeps shooting him down. Do you seriously believe I would want Putin as president? Its simply an illustration of my contempt for Cankles. I could never vote for her for dog catcher never mind president

 

I can't tell if your are trolling or serious.

 

But Hillary has cankles and that makes her medically unfit to be President.

 

Yeah, I'll take the carnival barker over the one that barks like a dog on command. It isn't like liberals have a choice anyway, the establishment told you who your candidate would be back before Iowa...

 

Well, good thing there are not enough people like you to get the carnival barker elected. He can't even win the nomination. Also, he's going to rip the party apart when he doesn't get 1237. What a joke.

 

When was the last time Hillary won a primary? Might want to worry about the clowns on your side before worrying about others...

 

Especially with Hillary and her Transparency problem. More of her unethical ways.

http://www.politicalforum.com/elect...-static-noise-conceal-fundraising-speech.html

 

If you're trying to equate the clown show on the right with the tight race on the left, you need a nap. Have fun at your contested convention freakshow.

 

Keep telling yourself that the no-name socialist that's putting up a serious challenge to the establishment Wall St queen isn't a circus. There might well be two contested conventions, talk about freakshow!

 

Hillary Clinton’s Vanishing Base.....

But Hil(*)lary Clin(*)ton is fa(*)cing a ser(*)i(*)ous prob(*)lem with her own party’s base in the on(*)go(*)ing primary against Bernie Sanders. She’s be(*)ing soundly re(*)jec(*)ted by mil(*)len(*)ni(*)als, a core ele(*)ment of Barack Obama’s co(*)ali(*)tion, while gen(*)er(*)at(*)ing only mid(*)dling en(*)thu(*)si(*)asm from His(*)pan(*)ics and Afric(*)an-Amer(*)ic(*)ans. Without Obama in the race, Clin(*)ton ex(*)pec(*)ted black voters to once again be a pil(*)lar of her sup(*)port. And the more po(*)lite tone of the Demo(*)crat(*)ic cam(*)paign has turned nas(*)ti(*)er in re(*)cent weeks, with Sanders call(*)ing Clin(*)ton “un(*)qual(*)i(*)fied” to be pres(*)id(*)ent and Clin(*)ton’s hus(*)band re(*)buk(*)ing Afric(*)an-Amer(*)ic(*)an pro(*)test(*)ers on the cam(*)paign trail for be(*)ing ob(*)li(*)vi(*)ous to the crime-fight(*)ing suc(*)cesses of his ad(*)min(*)is(*)tra(*)tion.

The num(*)bers don’t lie. As my col(*)league Ron Brown(*)stein noted, 71 per(*)cent of Demo(*)crat(*)ic voters un(*)der the age of 30 have flocked to Sanders—even though it’s been clear for a month that he faces near-im(*)possible odds of win(*)ning the nom(*)in(*)a(*)tion. For the second straight elec(*)tion, Clin(*)ton has al(*)lowed an in(*)sur(*)gent to cap(*)ture a his(*)tor(*)ic share of the Demo(*)crat(*)ic Party’s primary votes. She is now stag(*)ger(*)ing to the Demo(*)crat(*)ic nom(*)in(*)a(*)tion with a shrink(*)ing 1-point lead over Sanders in the latest Real(*)Clear(*)Polit(*)ics av(*)er(*)age of na(*)tion(*)al primary polls.

Demo(*)crat(*)ic turnout has plummeted in nearly every state from 2008, in(*)clud(*)ing in areas with large non(*)white vot(*)ing pop(*)u(*)la(*)tions. His(*)pan(*)ics stayed home in Texas, con(*)trib(*)ut(*)ing to a nearly 50 per(*)cent drop-off in turnout from eight years ago. In Geor(*)gia, Afric(*)an-Amer(*)ic(*)ans didn’t vote in large num(*)bers, cut(*)ting the state’s Demo(*)crat(*)ic turnout from over 1 mil(*)lion in 2008 to only 765,000 in 2016. The fast-grow(*)ing Pu(*)erto Ric(*)an pop(*)u(*)la(*)tion cen(*)ter of Flor(*)ida—Or(*)ange County—saw Demo(*)crat(*)ic turnout dip by 16,000 voters from eight years ago. Cuyahoga County, the Demo(*)crat(*)ic base of battle(*)ground Ohio, saw a whop(*)ping 44 per(*)cent de(*)cline in party voters.

By veer(*)ing to the left from the out(*)set and run(*)ning on a third term of Obama’s pres(*)id(*)ency, she’s made it very dif(*)fi(*)cult to win over voters in the middle. She emu(*)lated the Obama cam(*)paign’s be(*)lief that elec(*)tions are won by ral(*)ly(*)ing the base, not by ap(*)peal(*)ing to the shrink(*)ing num(*)ber of un(*)de(*)cided voters. Now, fa(*)cing res(*)ist(*)ance from that very base, she’s be(*)come de(*)pend(*)ent on Re(*)pub(*)lic(*)ans to nom(*)in(*)ate someone un(*)elect(*)able to get her out of her pre(*)dic(*)a(*)ment.....snip~

https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/622373?unlock=HSVHPY0GVQVJ42PK&mref=homepage-free

 

Remember,on this date 4-14-16,i'm telling all,Hillary Clinton will be the next POTUS!

 

Wow... considering her "resume", which includes the beginnings of the Iran nuclear "agreement", the overthrow and radicalization of Libya, the botched, deceitful mishandling of the Benghazi tragedy, the "Arab Spring" calamity that caused turmoil and chaos all over North Africa, including Egypt, shoveling out billions of dollars to people who hate our guts while making a silly, gushing ass out of herself, and, her stupid, reckless disregard for national security and the handling of classified information, maybe it would easier to pose a different question for the thread altogether. I'd suggest:

Given her past performance at the Federal level, how is Hillary Clinton in any way qualified to be the President of the United States?


. "Hey, it's my (*)(*)(*)(*)ing TURN! Get over it!"

 

She says she never heard anyone saying she isn't qualified to be President. So that's got her in a bit of a tizzy over Sanders saying she isn't qualified.

Naturally she lied again as she has heard several Republicans say she isn't qualified.

 

She is unfit to be President. However, so are Cruz and Trump.

 

AGREED. This "the lesser of two evils" argument is pathetic.

No one right now is fit to lead the free world. None of the politicians we have. We need a do-over.

 

I think Bernie Sanders does, but he is honest and trustworthy. I agree with his left politics, but the former stands no matter what.

 

Of course, that is the decision of the American electorate, not the "mainstream media."

The GOP fatwas directed at her have included her killing Vince Foster, being complicit in a fatal attack on a diplomatic mission, and not being email server savvy.

Is the trophy-wife-accumulating schlock tv celebrity more "ethically" qualified to lead the nation, regardless of his never having demonstrated a modicum statesmanship?

Americans will, quite properly, decide in November.

I trust them.

 

Really.....and if the MS Media didn't bring them the story at 5, 6, 9, and 10 pm. How would they be informed about anything? Did you want to go with everybody has a computer and looks it up? All read newspapers.

Did you think downplaying her negatives makes you look intelligent? Not being email savvy has nothing to do with mishandling classified material, and giving up a breach of national security. Only the lonely that can't wait would come up with. Hillary isn't email savvy.

When did your token Senator ever prove she was qualified?

Yes that's when the Election will be decided. A Common fact that most Americans know. Glad to see you can keep up with the Americans rather than have it all explained out to you.

 

Has the FBI finished it investigation? Any indictment, arrest or conviction? I guess we don't need those. The court of public opinion is where we should try everyone. Its the American way! LOL

 

Americans obtain their political acumen in a variety of ways, from a variety of sources. Most are aware that the former Secretary of State is not under investigation by the FBI and, of course, has not been charged with any illegalities despite al the bellywhinging. If she is charged, they will revise their opinions accordingly.

With Trump calling Cruz a "Liar!", Cruz calling Trump a "Liar!", and Clinton haters calling Hillary a "Liar!", it's essential that they acquaint themselves with the truth.

 

Nope not over yet. But we do have Two Judges, one saying Hillary the employee broke government policy and another who says there was bad faith by Hillary and her team as well as indications of wrongdoing.....then the FBI has expanded its investigation into looking at corruption by Hillary and her Team of miscreants. So it will be some time before they are done.

Which will still leave the investigations by the IG's at the State Dept. So plenty to constantly drip out and help (*)(*)(*)(*) up her day.

 

Oh most are aware she isn't under investigation by the FBI? Where did you come up with that. As Most talking about her being dishonesty and lying comes from what the FBI is investigating concerning her emails and private server.

Naturally with them coming out and saying they will question Hillary. Helps change up that perspective about you thinking, what most know.

Yeah they aren't done and haven't brought charges to her or her people yet. But they did give immunity to her techie.

Not to mention those Two Judges that already pointed out.....what you can't figure out.

 

You have INDICATIONS! He has indications folks. Real live indications. Where are the tar and feathers? He has INDICATIONS!!!!! LOL

 

No, the Judge sitting in the Court of Law has the indications. How did you confuse that. You aren't looking to show those smart powers are just alleged again, were you?

I'll bet if it was your ass under investigation. You wouldn't like the Judge telling your attorney that you came with bad faith and that there are indications of your wrongdoing, huh?

Tell us all how you would laugh in the judges face.