Woman Shoots and Kills Intruder - Saves Infant

And you have stats you break this down right? I mean no one is ever murders in their own home according to you right?

Your welfare trolling tactic is getting very very overdone.

 

Unarmed? A knife is unarmed?

Your claim that NOONE would run after someone with a knife is false, and you know this. Perhaps he was high on crack? Perhaps he would think she couldn't pull the trigger? Do you have children? A wife? Would you be saying "she should have" if this were your wife and child?

 

You're exactly right! But I am thinking the preservation of the woman and baby's life, and you are more concerned about the preservation of the intruder's life. What a warped freakin' mind you have.

 

they don't do stats on home invasions because most of them are burglaries, that means they don't result in violence unless the criminal is cornered which this one was not

those guys burglarized the entire area, the stalking part was sensationalized for the story

 

No Mak, it doesn't.


"Both partners applying for the marriage license must be over the age of 18. If either is aged 16-17, a parent or legal guardian must be present. If either is under 16, marriage is prohibited except by court order."



As to why any parent would allow this, I can't answer.

 

Figures....What the hell does this have to do with anything? Also, it's none of your business.

 

http://www.nationsearch.com/crimina...statistics/bid/31908/Home-Invasion-Statistics

According to a United States Department of Justice report:

38% of assaults & 60% of rapes occur during home invasions.
1 of every 5 homes will experience a break-in or home invasion. That's over 2,000,000 homes!


You are so easy to prove wrong.

 

if he ran toward her with a knife then would agree it was justified but that is unlikely and speculation in favor of the woman, without any investigation as the cops decided there is no way to tell really

BUT if there was an investigation and the crime scene detectives found he was shot at the front door and didn't make any progress toward the woman then it could be concluded he didn't know he was going to get shot

that would be be wrong imo because she was in full control of the situation and if she announced she had a gun the guys would have left

 

What right does the guy have to enter her private property? NONE. So, by that token he should already be aware that he could be shot, correct?

His fault all the way around a million times over. No question about it.

He deserved to be shot...if only he could have been tortured first....because, no doubt that's what would have been happenening to that woman, and possibly her child if she had nothing but a hairdryer to defend herself.

But, thank God she had a gun, and this man is now dead.

 

they are the only ones that do statistics, the FBI or police don't do those stats

but even so those stats don't give any justification to shoot anyone since at least 40 percent are non violent and result in the loss of property

many lives could be saved if a warning shot was fired by homeowners instead of a free pass to shoot anyone breaking and entering

 

and the piece of crap forced her to now have to carry with ehr the rest of her life the burden of killing someone. She did the right thing. Did you see her size and the size of the intruder? What might have happened had she had no gun???

I shudder to think.

 

You are impossible to debate with. First you say there are no stats and then you ignore them because it comes from the DoJ and not the police....

Why do you post here? Its a political forum were people debate. You dont debate anything. You dont provide stats or sources for your information. Why are you here?

 

So she should have taken a 40% chance that he would not have hurt her? Your line of thinking of nothing short of absurd.

 

so everyone agrees with a free pass to kill someone breaking and entering even if their intent is not to do harm but steal?

will concede the debate if that is the case and leave the thread

 

Do you think if the homeowner is inside the home while someone is breakin in, the homeowner should feel safe from harm? Should the homeowner take their chances whether the intruder intends to harm them or not? Should the homeowner just assume that themselves and their family is safe from harm and let the intruder in to do what they want to?

So to answer your question, if I am in the home, and someone breaks in, YES, I do have a right to shoot them.

 

And if he had been able to do whatever he was going to do to her and her baby, and she somehow survived? She would have been worse off carrying that around, than being a hero who saved herself and her child.

I wonder when it comes to these people who are against our right to own a gun....would they have said to their wife after being raped and tortured, and after their baby was kidnapped...."well, just thank God you didn't have a gun, and could have possibly killed the man"

Unbelievable.

 

Yes....now leave.

 

Tell us why you feel its ok for people to break into peoples homes and steal? Are these people criminals to you? Or do you believe this is yet another "share the wealth" scenario?

 

they are oppressed and redistributing the wealth illegally because its not done legally by government

if they are just stealing property they shouldn't be killed because there is no legitimate defense claim to kill someone for defending property

 

How old is the computer you are using? Mine is from 2005. If yours is newer i want it. You can have my old one.

Share the wealth.

 

Oppressed how? The crackheads who are stealing for their next high are oppressed and we should sympathize, right?

Again, HOW IS THE HOMEOWNER to determine whether the intruder is violent or not? Would you sit them down and have a conversation with them? Should the homeowner wait till they have a gun pointed at them and their wife has been shot in the head and then decide the intruder is violent?

 

You're kidding? Right?

 

Yes, and George Washington was one of those kook right wing extremists as well:

 

that is a funny post, reps sent

 

That was about the most perfect response I have seen in a long long time.