Zimmerman Trial (Thurs July 11) ~ Continued MOD ALERT

And If I buy that. . . . will you sell me a bridge?

What happened to the location where he was first "reportedly" attacked?

What happened to the "age of the suspicious person?" (from "late teenager" on the 911 call, to the "a few years younger than me" to Serino?)

What happened to his "looking for an address" when he stated the street he was on with no problem. . .AND the house right in FRONT of him had a number facing him


But. . .that's okay. . .you believe every word this liar and coward says. . .that's fine.

I hope you carry the consequences of your support of this guy in your own karma.

 

I'm not sure I understand ... did you not watch the police interview where Zimmy showed the cops how he simply reached across his waist with his left arm and pulled his weapon from a waist-holster on his right-side (to where Martin was reaching for it and that Zimmy at that moment forgot he had a gun) and shot 'em to death with his left hand ... then the next day in the walkthrough he shows the cops how he reached and grabbed the gun with his right arm from the area of his upper-right-butt and shot 'em with his right hand ?

 

Sure it did. . .Although Zimmerman stated that the threat WAS NOT neutralized. . .since he felt he had to jump up, straddle the dying Martin, spread his hands away from his body, and ask the first responder to help him restrain the dying teenager!

Yep. . .he sure thought the "threat was neutralized" all right!

Just another of those conflicting statements that Zimmerman is so good at!

 

I do stand up comedy from time to time, I am going to use this, it will be so classic!!!! The kid himself bragged about being a thug, what a bright future!!!

 

First of all the person to whom you were responding made no such admittance, not even close to it so why did you paint it that way?

And not a shred of evidence to ssupport it. The evidence at trial which you claimed would vindicate your fallacious claims about the trajectory did precisely the opposite and substantiated Zimmerman. So stop making your baseless assertions about it.

 

Why? Because it fits your own desire to believe Zimmerman's every word?

Those testimonies were FAR apart. . .and I hope the jury WILL consider just how far apart they were!

 

No. . .it didn't! It is obvious that the trajectory was a dead give away. . .NO ONE in Zimmerman "stated" situation would have been able to pull such a "perfect" shot.

And I hope this will not be lost on the jury!

 

Then why did the judge ask the prosecution if they wanted to include manslaughter and why did West say it was optional (which it is but it is the prosecutions option).

 

Yep, Martin retreated after getting shot and Zimmerman did not shoot again, which pretty much shows restraint and an understanding of the situation at that point in time.

 

No because I deal with evidence not supposition or simple emotional dismissals.

No they aren't considering the circumstances and nothing which refutes his self defense claim. The jury should consider one thing did the state prove it did not happen as Zimmerman stated and if not prove beyond a reasonable doubt it was murder by presenting the clear and indisputable evidence of exactly what happened. They failed at both and so have you.

 

No what is up to you is to be a grown up and not wish I'll events on those who disagree with you. You need help. You the real person behind the Avatar. I'm seriously worried that you will decide to suck on a shotgun if this doesn't go your way. But I'm not wishing that on you as you are to me. I'm seriously begging you to get get some counseling. What you just wished upon me is not normal thought.

 

The prosecution presented nothing to support your claim, in spite of the fact you claimed they would and the defense totally refuted your claims with their's. You lost the point at trial. Admit it. You are NOT and expert in forensics or ballistics and have no authority in this matter and certainly your assertions do not refute the expert testimony so just admit it.

 

What really matters in this trial now is whether or not the jurors believe that Zimmerman shot in self defense because he was in reasonable fear of grievous bodily injury or death.

If that's the case, then the jury can't really convict him even on manslaughter.

 

She's not wrong ... you simply sold your soul to a guy who shot to death an innocent teen.

 

I'm not sure if you know this. . .but Karma can be GOOD and can be BAD. . .and NO ONE can affect your karma.

So. . .as I said before, you are giving me MUCH TOO MUCH credit if you think I can impact your karma. . .one way or another.

Interesting, though, that you automatically assume that Zimmerman's karma (and the other zimbots by association) will be "bad!"

That's kind of funny in itself!

But. . .If you really believe I can affect your or anyone else's karma. . .maybe YOU should get some counseling!

 

O'Mara will make this point crystal clear tomorrow. If his client is innocent by self-defense on any one charge, he is innocent on all.

 

I guess we will find out after the jury has a chance to deliberate and comes out with a verdict, right?

So. . .why should we stress? One way or another. . .the universe will take care of it!

I'm just glad that the trial took place.

 

Respecting the Law and a judge are 2 different things, and no, after the grandstanding stunt that the Judge pulled yesterday, she should be removed from the bench and disbarred.

Sure, why not, we already know Trayvon wasn't.

You are mistaken completely if you think I give you any credit, but the fact that you wish Bad Karma to come to all us Zimbots as you so eloquently put could be considered just as much a personal attack as me calling you delusional, can't have it both ways. But your ignorance on the matter is duly noted.

 

lol the line of the trial so far was West saying "Oh my God, just when I thought this trial couldn't get any more bizarre."

I'm actually shocked the judge didn't allow that third degree felony child abuse thing, given her track record in this case of backing the prosecution in most things.

 

The chart is probably out of date. I know they removed murder 2 from a necessary included offense of murder 1 to an optional offense, so they may have done something similar with murder 2 and manslaughter.

By the way Beck v. Alabama (US Supreme Court) requires the lesser charges in capital cases, but the Florida Supreme Court also put the necessary lesser offenses in their table in non-capital cases.

 

See. . .you are already experiencing your own karma.... just by assuming I wish you bad karma!

That's consciousness speaking!

 

That is not stating that I can bring bad Karma on my self. That is not stating that I should be aware of karma and how it effects you. That is you stating that you hope that my support for Zimmerman brings I'll events in my real life. That is you losing it. You have taken this way too far and if you don't get some help I and others on this board are really worried that you will harm yourself if this doesn't go your way. You need help. Back away from the keyboard and call a psychiatrists ASAP.

 

If Zimmerman is found not guilty what purpose for you did the trial serve?

 

It looks like you and Bernie are settling for a "dream" at the moment.

 

It brought up to the consciousness of people the bunch of lies that were spun by Zimmerman and co.

And, being found "not guilty" because of "reasonable doubt" is a FAR CRY from being found innocent!

Zimmerman will NEVER be found innocent. . .no more than OJ ever was. .. . and that will NEVER be out of people's mind!

I hope you have set aside a monthly donation for the Zimmerman's cause. . . because he will need it more than ever if he is found "not guilty!"