New Travon Martin Pic ~ # 2

You know legal-terms as they pertain to this case like every Zimmerhead here does .... zero, bupkis, squat ...

 

And neither one has been violated in the Zimmerman's case either. Trading information between the defense and the prosecution in Any TRIAL is a chess match and both sides usually make claims the other side is withholding. If either party feels that the other party is withholding they file a complaint with the judge and the judge resolves the issue. There is only a violate if one of the parties do not abide by the specific ruling of the judge.

 

Buncha crap ... the state has provided all information and evidence on the case including the release of texts and photos of Martins cell phone .. motions which can be seen here ~ (particularly DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO STATE'S MOTION IN LIMINE .... (3 prosecution motions for gag orders now) ... ) ... http://www.gzlegalcase.com/index.ph...s-supplemental-notice-of-reciprocal-discovery

The defense then out of ethical-breach ... that is, violating *good faith* as it pertains to Floridas' code of professional conduct (extrajudicial-breach) ... released it to the public ...

This goes to jury selection voir dire where O'Mara will motion to sequester the jury like everybody is an idiot and never heard of media.


Just like Jodi Arias' new penalty-phase jury (trial).

 

How do you know the the State has provided all of the evidence to the Defense? Are you on the prosecution team?

If you notice in your own link, it is the DEFENSE that is filing the DEFENDANT’S SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY claiming that the STATE is in violation.

The Defense has nothing to do with the judges ruling on a gag order. As long as the judge has not placed a gag order on the case, the Defense is free to release information to the media AS ALL GOOD LAWYERS IN A CRIMINAL CASE WOULD DO.

A jury sequester has nothing to do with information already in the media, it has everything to do with the information released DURING TRIAL. Of course, a perfect jury would be one with no prior knowledge of the case, but I don't think we have had that on a high profiled case since the 1800's.

 

There you go. Once again you have proven that you do not know the law. You used a legal term that did not apply, and then complain that I did not do the same. You claimed that this was a issue about discovery when it actually is an issue of disclosure. The two sides are arguing about what to disclose to the jury. There, is that legalese enough for you, or do you want to argue other jurisprudence that does not apply, such as habeas corpus?

 

Your Habeas Corpus has already been ... Zimmy was released without charges so he could make it home for a late dinner after murdering a teen ... and you probably think Martin got his due process ... jus'nutha hoodie-wearing black gangbanger has been rid of ... so Zimmy is free to go home and sue MSNBC.

LOL.

 

They don't see "we don't need you to do that" as a stand-down order, even though it clearly is a request for Zimmerman to not pursue.

Anyway, the only criminal involved in the altercation that night was Zimmerman, the guy who aggressively pursued Martin after calling him an "(*)(*)(*)hole". Since Martin's body was found far from Zimmerman's car, Zimmerman must have followed him quite a bit on foot. And yet they still want to believe that Zimmerman stayed by his car, or was attacked while trying to get back into his car.

While O'Mara tries to defame an underage person by voluntarily airing his private information to the public instead of the courtroom, he is making himself seem as obsessive -- take Martin down at all costs.

 

Nice strawman!!! They sure are pretty when you build them.

 

200 feet is not far (distance from GZ's vehicle to TM's body). In fact, 600 feet isn't very far either (distance from GZ's vehicle to the apartment where TM was staying).

 

I have one everytime a Zimmerhead makes an utterance ... the longer the persecution and prosecution of Zimmy continues so is the injustice of it all ... LOL.

 

Yep, they sure are pretty.

 

I'm not ready to take a bow until the Zimmy verdict comes in ... LOL.

 

Exactly. Habeas corpus does not apply to the issue, nor does discovery.

Look, both Zimmerman and Martin acted stupidly. But you need to answer this question. If it had been Zimmerman that had been killed, would you be pushing the issue? Would this prosecution have become as politically motivated as it is?

 

Why did Martin act stupidly ?

Oh that's right ... he was a hoodie-wearing black demonic teen who would have eventually done some killing himself ... who had the misfortune of (stupidly) going down to the convienience store to buy some skitles and watermelon juice at the wrong moment ... because after all, Zimmy would have eventually killed somebody too ...

How could fate be so cruel ?

 

Yeah, it's far. There are many claims from Zimmerites who say that he stayed by his car. Obviously if he got into a fight 200' from his car then he did not stay by his car. He pursued Trayvon in his car and on foot and that made him the aggressor.

People should not follow others who are peacefully and lawfully minding their own business. It's common sense.

- - - Updated - - -

But only one of them was a child.

 

Nobody has ever claim GZ stay by his vehicle. GZ himself doesn't even claim that.

People shouldn't attack other people just because they are following them. GZ might have started out as the aggressor, but TM became the aggressor when he allegedly attacked GZ. Being followed by someone is not enough reason to attack them with physical violence.

p.s. a lot of people can throw a rock 200 feet.

 

Zimmerman had plenty of time to get back to his truck... He claims that's where he was going.

 

BWAHAHAHAHA! "One of the was a child".....hilarious! Druggie Trayvon was a burglary tool carrying violent punk who was thrown out of his house by his own mother....a child....puh-leeze....LOL!

 

And TM had plenty of time to get to the apartment. Instead, he waited for GZ to catch up and attacked him.

However, "time enough" is irrelevant once the person is prevented from reaching their destination because they were physically assaulted.

 

Trayvon was just another violent punk wannabe gangsta...you have that part right....congrats.

 

Well, that seems to be Zimmys' *new* defense since self-defense as stand your ground didn't pan out.

 

The last video this poster referenced was Al Sharpton.....so don't expect much....lolz!

- - - Updated - - -

Nah, it is still self defense as it has been all along.

 

You have no proof that George was attacked nor do you have Any proof that he didnt initiate the physical confrontation. Pictures don't prove any of that either.

 

Good luck with that ... since jumping out of your vehicle after calling 911 to cap-off a black teen isn't stand your ground.