New Travon Martin Pic ~ # 2

With this latest stunt .... O'Mara may have crossed the line of *good faith* ... *oath* and constitutionality ... i.e. the rules of professional conduct ... in fact, Florida begins its rules with this ...



Florida Rules of Professional Conduct

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ethics/fl/code/FL_CODE.HTM#Rule_4-1.1


INTRODUCTION

Preamble: A Lawyer's Responsibilities

A lawyer is a representative of clients, an officer of the legal system, and a public citizen having special responsibility for the quality of justice.

 

Prove it was a lie.....

- - - Updated - - -

Oh now you want to talk about lawyer conduct when the truth comes out about Trayvon....LOL!

 

Since day 1 of O'Mara on the case, his advise to Zimmy has been bizzare .. it's what the State Bar calls *over-zealous advocacy* or *frivolous* ... and *adverse* to his client ...

Under the rules of Floridas' professonal conduct ... O'Mara looks to have violated the rules of Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel, Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal and (Pre)-Trial Publicity (Prejudicial Extrajudicial conduct) ... just on this latest stunt ...

 

Hahahha.. in her mind, trayvon is just in innocent 9 year old black kid who is Obamas kid..... And also she is a lawyer with the ability to bend reality to her liking . Weed for the win.

 

Then this was a false statement:

Trayvon was no angel. He was a troubled teen involved the the thug culture that plagues black America. A = A.

 

this legal stuff is over your head. you might want to stick with your cartoons and al sharpton videos.....

- - - Updated - - -

this fact is also ignored by liberal progs who continue to exploit blacks to get votes....

 

If I were Zimmy I'd wise up to the fact as to how his attorney has even destroyed his appellate (process) ... LOL.

 

Oh, this will come as a civil rights violation or hate-crime should the FEDS want to change thier mind and charge Zimmy wether or not Zimmy is convicted the state level ...

This goes to the bizzare conduct of O'Mara in inciting the jury pool to hate & racial-prejudice on Faux Noize.

 

HEHEHEHE! Really? Funny how you are the only one saying that.

 

Well, take for instance *the curious case* of Jodi Arias ... here, the jury convicted her of first degree murder but couldn't impose the death penalty ... or a mistrial on the penalty phase ... this practically means the entire case has to be heard again ...

*Curious* is the foreman of the jury who has now stated that Arias' 18 days on the witness stand during her murder trial didn't do her any good ... further, he gives the reasons why ...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_...says-convicted-killer-was-not-a-good-witness/


This is important because jurisprudence is much different in Arizona than Florida ...

 

what does jodi arias have to do with this case? you are comparing apples to oranges. are you a nancy grace fan?

 

Read the reasons given by the jury foreman in the Jodi Arias case.

 

Many defense lawyers in Florida have spoken out against OMara's tactics.

 

You are so submissive I almost want to date you.

 

You really need to stay away from spouting law, as you are very bad at it.

Arias was found guilty. She will not be retried to decide her guilt or innocence. If the jury can not reach a decision between execution or life, then there WILL be another trial, however, this trial will only be to decide sentencing. If the prosecution removes the death penalty from the table, there will be NO sentencing trial and she WILL get life in prison.

 

And, as usual, you provide no links to back up your claims.

 

Push 9-1-1.

- - - Updated - - -

NATIONALLY KNOWN defense lawyers have been ripping the prosecution since Day One.

 

At this point in the game, this is what I expect to happen.

Considering it could take 20 years to finally execute her otherwise, perhaps this is the most logical step, as far as cost to the taxpayer.


I saw a cost difference a couple days ago (sorry no link), but the cost of death row was in the 125k range vs 30k for gen pop inmates (per year). It's difficult to imagine the difference.

 

apples to oranges comparison....different state, different charges, different circumstances....etc....

 

Read the latest news from Florida... There are also videos.

 

You know, just because you know a couple of legal terms does not mean that you know the law. This is not a reciprocal or supplemental discovery issue. How do I know? Because there is a hearing scheduled for the issue. That means that both sides know about these texts and pictures. Now, do you have anything that says that the prosecution is claiming that the defense with held this evidence? No? I didn't think so.

The fact is that if this case had not became politically motivated, it never would have gone this far. The prosecution has a very weak case. As a result, all they want the jury to hear is that Martin is dead, and Zimmerman pulled the trigger. They want to avoid any evidence that points to how or why. These texts and pictures enforces the defense's case, and makes the prosecution's case even weaker.

BTW, I lived in the Jacksonville area for seven year prior to joining the Marines and two years after I got out.

 

I expect that course of action as well. I think some members on the jury don't want to execute her because that is what she wishes.

I have no doubt that death row inmates cost more per day than genpop. Tighter security. More guards per inmate. More coordination for daily routines, etc.

 

LOL....I'm not going to scour Florida's news media to look for something you claim is there. If you want to be taken seriously, then you should provide support of your claims, preferably when you make them. Otherwise, people might start to believe that you are nothing more than a liar and will not find you credible. Personally, because of your standard answer of "I've posted it dozens of times already, you look for it" and "Read the latest news from Florida... There are also videos [iow, look yourself]", your credibility with me is rock bottom, but I'm sure you don't really care.

 

You still know nothing of the law ... otherwise you would counter my legal-terms with yours ... which appear to be non-existent.

 

You haven't a CLUE what you are blathering about:



reciprocal discovery n. the exchange of documents, lists of witnesses, and other information between the two sides of a lawsuit or criminal prosecution before trial.

Supplemental Discovery Law & Legal Definition

Supplemental discovery is a later set of questions or requests for information from the opposing party in a lawsuit, such as in the form of interrogatories or requests for production.


NEITHER term applies to the SENTENCING trial of Jodie Arias.


Good Grief....