The truth about 'human shields'. MOD ALERT

Another statement reminiscent of 1930's Germany

 

The IOF apologists are in principle no different from the kinds of Holocaust denialists they rightly deride.

 

Show me rape please.

 

IDF ! ....

 

Boom, boom!!

 

Care to show us some substantiation of WP being illegal or are we seeing another moon story.

 

Your words "against" Hamas. War crime if carried out by civilsed countries.

 

See if you can obtain a copy of the Goldstone Report. It's all in there. Goldstone never withdrew his report, incidentally, and neither did any other committee members. The Report stands. Israel is named for war crimes, although knuckledraggers might dispute this.

 

Read and learn as opposed to continuing your shameful apologising for the killing of civilians:

www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2013/0...-white-phosphorus-during-operation-cast-lead/

 

Semantics. They used it against Hamas to provide cover and illuminate. Please don't ask me to clarify this again.

 

No. Israel is a nation that does not fall into any loose interpretation of a widely accepted comprehensive definition of terrorism

 

Maybe, but Palestinians do not own the Big Media, they do not own Hollywood, they do not own the FED, they do not sponsor the American presidential candidates, and ADL or AIPAC are not Palestinian lobbies.

So who cares about the logic of Palestinians?

The average punter in the West sees the world through the "Jewish Glasses", and western politicians are de facto on the payroll of the Zionists.

That is the reason why the crazy logic of Zionists is forced upon the average western punter and his "representatives".

 

That is the usual tactic of ALL Hasbaratniks, I guess that this is the first rule, written in their Hasbara Handbook.

 

What about the IMT?

What kind of court was that?

 

Yeah, they needed illumination in broad daylight! http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgu...QqTlUcr4HsWJ0AXtzIHwDQ&ved=0CDcQ9QEwAg&dur=32

 

No, they use it for smoke cover in daylight. Golly no wonder this is so confusing for you.

 

Is that ' smoke cover ' the same illumination they use to ensure they don't kill 400 kids and a thousand other people ?

 

Perhaps you should READ your own links before pretending knowledge of facts.... It certainly cuts down on looking stupid....

FROM YOUR LINK...

Before you read SIXTY words comes my answer....

Wanna count them?

"Such munitions are not prohibited under international law, ..."

As the question you responded to was

"Care to show us some substantiation of WP being illegal or are we seeing another moon story.'

I would think you demonstrated to everyone here a miserable failure on your part. Hope you enjoy it as much as I am

 

So then, in Knuckleballerworld you can use white phosphorous against civilians. Do we know it was used by the neoZionists ? Yes we do. Do we know that it was used against civilians ? Yes we do. Do we know that it's illegal to do so ? Yes we do. Do we consider the neoZionists to be war criminals ?............

 

Smoke and illumination are different moon. One obscures vision and the other enhances it.

 

You don't say ? And the neoZionists have mastered both simultaneously. There comes a time when one's cred is crud.

 

So we can agree that Palestinians do not own the Big Media, they do not own Hollywood, they do not own the FED, they don't own much nor garner much respect around the world except by fringe groups of people with questionable motives....

Why is that? Why are the pallys so poor and held in such low regard?

Could it be....

View attachment 20971
or perhaps...

View attachment 20972

Bottom line, sympathy for people who do nothing other than bemoan the past while doing nothing to better their own lives or even bother to try to assist their children to a better life is in the dictionary, somewhere between sheik and Syria. Any other placement is foolish.

The arguments presented by the pallyfanboys is ALWAYS the same... something that happened 10, 15, 20, 50 or 100 years ago. The people that hurt the poor stupid defenseless pallys are mean and evil and should be punished.

The pallys are going to throw rocks at their tanks to settle the score.

Makes me want to yell....

HEY DUMMY!!!! The best revenge is in living well.

The Jewish people often speak of the Holocaust and of the long list of hurts and insults through history. They speak of them and seek to have them made right, but in the mean time they are exacting their revenge by LIVING WELL.

Children in Israel go to fine schools, live in well constructed homes in relative safety, enjoy the best medical care available anywhere and eat good wholesome food. They have little to worry about and concentrate on living a good life.

Why? because their parents as Jews have done for thousands of years place far more importance on their children having it better than they did than on sitting in the desert swaddled in a filthy blanket sucking their thumbs trying to make the world feel sorry for them.

You don't have what you think you're entitled to? As they say in the Mexican Marines... El Tougho Sheeto, deal with it. Make the best of what you have and WORK toward getting the rest.

Throwing rocks and launching rockets isn't going to force the Israelis to give you what you want. You would need to WIN the war and that's simply not happening; evidenced by the hand wringing and whimpering on this thread. In the end, the palestinians would lose any war miserably, look at history.

A war isn't like a football game where if you break the rules you are penalized and somehow the advantage you gained is taken away. The winner of a war holds the trials and writes the history books and the loser... generally he doesn't care because he's simply DEAD. He might have been right and the winner may have cheated, but he's still dead and he still lost. Cruel and hash but that's the way of the world.

The Palestinians, if they REALLY want a peaceful settlement need to wake up. They need to show Hamas the door and they need to DISCUSS their future WITH Israel. They don't have the juice to make demands, nor the credibility to much be taken seriously. The need to ask for peace and PROVE their intentions through ACTION.

They need to get their kids in school.... REAL SCHOOL. They need to find an economy and build from there. The need to look for the people who know best how to make a living in the region, to establish schools and hospitals and businesses. We all know who those people are and we know that insulting and attacking isn't the way to their heart nor will it intimidate them.

Or you can keep throwing rocks, spinning around like a whirling dervish over the past and living like a pig... They're choice and YOUR choice who to back.

 

I' ve never heard of both being used at the same time, have you?

 

Yeah, let's keep being nice to them;

 

Originally Posted by moon :
The evidence of them being used against civilians is indisputable.

Originally posted by Knuckleballer:
The evidence of it being USED IS undisputable as is the Official IDF REACTION to the event. The fact that you continue to use FIVE YEAR OLD information is also obvious to anyone with even passing intelligence.

NOBODY is denying that it happenED in 2008, not me, not even the IDF. That was 2008 and the practice was discontinued. DID and DO are two very different words representing very different concepts
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Only challenge was of the use of the words DID and DO in direct response to Moons statement. "NOBODY is denying that it happenED" "USED" against civilians is illegal.

BYE