Where have you been.....? Abortions have been shown on Biography, The Learning Channel, and Discovery Channel. You act like this is something new and different.
That research has been blown apart due to it's lack of incorporating prior mental issues before a pregnancy or abortion took place. All relevant studies into PASS and other mental issues concerning abortions have shown that there is no significant difference between women who have abortions and those who don't, the vast majority of the so called studies that do show an increase in risk fail due to errors in methodology including Pregnancy associated deaths in Finland 1987-1994 - no inclusion of prior mental issues before pregnancy or abortion Why don't you read some proper research - http://www.aomrc.org.uk/doc_view/9432-induced-abortion-and-mental-health
ROFL what a well thought out researched and cited rebuttal. Profanity the best you got? My post still stands without rebuttal.
Language is not limited to medical dictionaries but I have demonstrated using the government. Centers for Dieases Control, Health and Human Resources, various medical/scientific cites and even from foriegn governments. You and you ilk have offered nothing in rebuttal that states otherwise. Stop dancing on a pin. Its a baby that is killed in an abortion, at least be honest about what you support.
The research is all there, BTW you do know that "partial-birth" abortion was banned in 2003 so your "research" is not only a pile of BS but also 12 years out of date. Care to provide your data, or even the data used on the site you link to, because you should know (though I doubt it) there are NO records kept as to the reasons for a late-term abortion - late-term being post 24 weeks, all records only record the reasons for all abortions post 21 weeks and nothing else. You post stands on nothing but sand and has be refuted numerous times.
When it comes to actual medical and scientific discussions and/or debates then the usage of correct terminology is the only intellectually honest thing to do . .though I fully understand that pro-lifers cannot be intellectual;y honest in their debates. The fact of the matter is that the correct terminology for the unborn between 8 weeks and birth is a fetus, it is only the requirement of emotional hyperbole that pro-lifers need to sustain their argument that leads them to use the erroneous word "baby" I have, as have others, produced numerous medical and scientific dictionary definitions of both fetus and baby, in none of them does "unborn child" or variations of appear in the definition of baby. I am not dancing on a pin, I am using the correct terminology required for the period of time relating to the unborn between 8 weeks and birth . by your logic calling you a child means nothing, after all, again, by your logic using the correct terminology is wrong. Nope, it is a fetus that is killed and that is 100% honest unlike your attempts to project some emotionally guilt.
So what now they make sure they kill the baby before they remove it even partially. Again so what? [/quote]You post stands on nothing but sand and has be refuted numerous times.[/QUOTE] No it still stands your specious response notwithstanding.
You post stands on nothing but sand and has be refuted numerous times.[/QUOTE] No it still stands your specious response notwithstanding.[/QUOTE] What little research there is on abortion after 24 weeks suggests that the overwhelming majority are for foetal abnormality
I like how this study takes time to rate any study that doesn't back their findings as poor. It's almost as if the British Government (who funded your study) doesn't believe the doctors from the British Medical Journal. So strange... http://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1431.full If I didn't know better, I'd say it's like the abortion providers are influencing the government there. Personally, I like the new "Don't ask, don't tell" policy for sex selective abortions in the UK. That's sure to drum up some baby killing business. http://liveactionnews.org/uks-top-abortion-provider-promoting-sex-selection-abortions/
Why are Anti-Choicers so concerned about the health of women who have abortions but aren't concerned at all about women who have given birth? Do we pass laws protecting everyone on earth from making a decision they MAY regret???
Great deflection, congratulations! Yes, we should protect PEOPLE who can't protect themselves....what a noble opinion....but I don't think anyone should be forced to give up their life or any part of their body so another "person" can live... Do you think you should be forced to give blood or give up a kidney to sustain the life of another person???
No it still stands your specious response notwithstanding.[/QUOTE] What little research there is on abortion after 24 weeks suggests that the overwhelming majority are for foetal abnormality[/QUOTE] No the research does not show that as already posted. - - - Updated - - - Why do pro-abortioners not at all concerned about the babies being killed and mutilated and then the parts sold off.
I assume by your ridiculous emotion-laden nonsense about "babies being killed" that you need that for a cover because you can't answer the questions of mine you quoted: Why are Anti-Choicers so concerned about the health of women who have abortions but aren't concerned at all about women who have given birth? Do we pass laws protecting everyone on earth from making a decision they MAY regret???
Maybe if these women cared a little bit more about their unborn child, they would choose to "row the boat" through the pregnancy when they know there is a loving caring family waiting to receive it.
At least the desirable categories of babies. I can see how crack babies would be harder to place. And there are too many Black babies on the adoption market right now.
