Report: Investigator Says Evidence Showing Deceased DNC Staffer Seth Rich Was Emailing With WikiLeak

You are 0 for 2 in this thread alone
best you read the links provided, get your self informed on the subject before you make more of a fool of your self

 

If this is true, wouldn't it mean that all of our intelligence agencies were wrong when they said that Russia hacked the DNC and provided the stolen documents to Wikileaks to interfere in the election?

 

need a link to the site which this was posted

 

they was never allowed to inspect the DNC email server to come to their own conclusion all they was going on was the word and information given to them from a private cyber company called crowd source which was hired by the DNC to inspect the server

 

I'm not the one being a fool.

 

I'm not sure they are that dumb to think such a thing. I just think they are diabolical , and they hate America and Americans.

 

10 months and still no one has even hinted how the Russians supposedly tried to influence the election or how Trump colluded with Russians. Literally nothing. It is just saying "Russians!" and "Putin!' 10 million times.

 

Now we know why the DNC refused to allow law enforcement to inspect their email server instead hired a private company to do so
Because law enforcement would have found out it wasn't a hack but instead emails taken from their Server by Seth Green
It was an inside job not a Russian hack

 

Maybe if you post the word "Russians" 1,000 times in a message that will constitute more proof of the Democratic Party and corporate PR propaganda outlets "noise machine."

 

Don't get your hopes up waiting for a full report that does anything other than shop the same conspiracy theory. This guy is a PR hack in teh pay of Fox News, pretending to be a private investigator. Yes, he has a shell company. But he makes his living as a Fox contributor and doing some consulting work for food safety, hardly homicide investigation material.

 

was my reply to you? it was to TomFitz

 

This has been known all along. Seth Rich, a Bernie Sanders supporter and computer data entry staffer of the DNC who had access to the email accounts that he even had posted on leaked the passwords to Wikileaks to expose the DNC schemes against Sanders on behalf of Clinton. To prevent further leaks and to prevent him possibly going public himself he was assassinated.

 

Yeah, look up. The second quote is mine. I think we both are inadvertently engaged in "failure to communicate."

This story and issue should be the NUMBER ONE story and the NUMBER ONE matter of a Congressional investigation, rather than silence and stonewalling.

 

Wheeler was a DC homicide detective.

 

http://www.fox5dc.com/news/local-news/254852337-story

"When we asked Wheeler if his sources have told him there is information that links Rich to Wikileaks, he said, “Absolutely. Yeah. That's confirmed."

 

Rich was killed in July. Wilkileaks dumped the evidence of the banana republic behavior of the DNC in July. The Rich hit was due to him leaking to wilkileaks. Picked up by Amb. Murray, who MSM went into blackout once he revealed that Russia was not the source, but an insider in DC. Assange offered a reward for info leading to catching the hit men. He all but said Rich was his source without directly revealing it.

Podesta said in a wilkileaks email that the whistle blowers and leakers need to be made an example of.

Russia was never involved with wilkileaks. Rich was murdered because of him giving wilkileaks the emails. And this could be proved, if a serious effort was put forward. If it isn't, we are seeing just how deep the corruption is in DC.

This is a conspiracy. A real one. I called it from early on. For you do not black out Murray unless there is a conspiracy. That was the "tell". The dots not only connect, they fall into place too easily, without any incoherence as the Russian conspiracy is filled with.

You can get zero info from the DC police or the FBI on this case of Rich. It is being repressed, even to the parents of Rich. The dead rat smell is overwhelming, and yet the dems say there is nothing to see here? But this is not over. We very well may discover the truth even if intel, does not want it revealed. For since Rich was the leaker, that means the FBI, CIA and NSA lied on blaming Russia for the DNC hacks. This looks like deep state corruption, used to try to take down a duly elected President.

None of this happens in a republic. But it would have in an Oligarchy. The Princeton Study told us we were living in an oligarchy. Welcome to it. This is how fascism actually operates.

 

You seem to be basically conceding that the Dem/Media conspiracy theory of "the Russians did it" is nonsense.

 

Link? Thanks!

Never mind, I found it!

http://www.salon.com/2017/05/16/fox-infowars-publish-debunked-conspiracy-about-murdered-dnc-staffer/

 

That is the concensus of all the US intelligence agencies and most of the major western ones as well.

Contrary to your false claim, it was not invented by the US media.

 

This confirms things that we already knew. We knew that Wikileaks said that they got the emails from an insider in the DNC, not a hacker, and although Wikileaks never confirmed the identity of their source, they did offer a 20,000 dollar reward for information leading to the capture of Seth Rich's killer.

So to me, there is a pretty obvious straight line connection.

As far as the murder goes, I'm not going to go so far as to say it was some sort of hit job. It could have been a simple robbery gone wrong, but that's a minor part of the story in my opinion. The real story is the source of the DNC emails.

 

To be fair, I think Seth is innocent.

 

Hillary didn't have anything to do with Flynn's omissions or his lying to Pence.

 

But you are now saying you don't believe the Russians did it? In spite of the "17 intelligence agencies?"

 

Me too.. Is there any evidence otherwise.. other than Assange's speculation?

 

That always bothered me. Since when do our outstanding intel agencies take the word of a third party private company on an extremely important matter. And when you consider that Crowd Source is heavily vested in the DNC and Clinton Presidential campaign, this glaring conflict of interest should disqualify it from any trust.