A Simple Question for Those Are Still Opposed to Same Sex Marriage

you didn't answer my question. So I'll ask again. How many children do you have?

 

So here we are we're running away from the question again.

It seems you know your claim is bogus.

 

5....but that doesn't tell you a thing.

 

Well it tells me 20 you've had sex 5 to 25 times in your entire life if you believe it often produces children. If you are in your 30s or 40s I'd assume you've had sex more than 25 times.

Keep in mind having sex 25 times and producing five children is a 20% chance that the sex you have will produce children. So I'm being generous with the term often.

 

Someone needs to discuss birth control with you.

 

If you control birth then that is sex without birth so again in most cases it doesn't produce a child.

 

Did it ever occur to,you that we the people, the general population, want this simple easy one shot method of establishing all those legal status, that is cheaper, for both citizen and government, than having to establish them separately? The issue of whether or not government should be in the business of establishing these legal relationships and the issue of who is allowed to establish these legal relationships are two separate issues. It is the later that is the problem not the former.

 

Where did I throw a fit?

 

360,000 times a day isn't "seldom".

sel·dom
ˈseldəm/
adverb
adverb: seldom

1. 1.
   not often; rarely.
   "Islay is seldom visited by tourists"
   synonyms: rarely, infrequently, hardly (ever), scarcely (ever), almost never; More
   now and then, occasionally, sporadically;
   informalonce in a blue moon
   "we seldom use the dining room"
   antonyms: often

adjective
dated
adjective: seldom

1. 1.
   not common; infrequent.
   "a great but seldom pleasure"

 

You get really nasty and make immature posts when someone argues against you. The better question is where did you not throw a fit.

Here

Here also.

It's like your brain turned to mush when you read what I said and you didn't look at what I was responding to.

 

out of nearly 7 billion yes it is.

 

Did you throw a hissy fit ?
Or a tantrum ?

Joke alert !

lol, just a bit of humour to break up the monogamy !!!!
Monotony....... lol

 

Here is the debate-

Id say I was spot on. You've actually convinced yourself you know better than I as to what I am in agreement with.

 

???? No 360,000 times a day isn't "rarely", "infrequently" or "hardly (ever)". How many times people have sex is irrelevant to the determination.

 

It is indeed relevant if you get too sore and painful to touch.

 

I think you're mistaken.

 

It's only inconvenient to you because it undermines your argument.

360000 out of 7 billion is not often.

 

When you make a claim of how frequently sex results in procreation, then by default you are making that claim based upon the frequency of sex. This goes for all result based claims of any given incident. An incident can occur only once every 10 years, but if it produces a result 3/4 of the time, then the result is frequent even as the incident itself is not. Back to your claim, even though sex is highly frequent, the result of procreation by comparison is not. By attempting to remove that comparative nature you are presenting false information.

 

I think you are full of ****.

 

Whatever it takes you to get through your day.

 

I don't care.

 

He made a good point. I don't understand why you don't argue against it.

I guess you are conceding

 

Translation: I cannot refute this so I will deflect.

 

Already did. 360,000 times a day isn't "seldom"

 

Already refuted with the definition of the word "seldom". 360,000 times a day isn't "seldom"