WATCH Syrian Boy in White Helmets FAKE Chemical Attack Video Reveals Truth

Hell, even if russians offered to pay me for posting what I sincerely believe, no way would I ever accept it. Out of principle. I cannot imagine any good american ever agreeing to be a paid russian shill. We will state our opinion and beliefs just because we are americans and have that right, and if the bad americans don't like that and call us russian trolls, then they are as I said bad americans and not worthy of even being an american. Americans have never marched lock step, looking like a goose. But we have always had these guys who tried to impose their own ideology upon others, using all kinds of tactics. Like calling an american a russian troll. Seems like they have more in common with putin than the people they call russian trolls.

 

I've lived here all my life except for a few years in Connecticut.

The area has grown a lot since the casinos came. I liked it better before, but that's "progress".

You must be thinking of Waveland, just west of Bay St. Louis. Doesn't take much to wipe out that area. It took a thumping with Camille, too. Hell, we all did with that one. Katrina, too, but Camille had way more of a punch.

 

Yes, the irony of their false accusations is that such tactics are their own form of authoritarianism and conformism. It's just 21st century McCarthyism.

 

These accusations wouldn't hold water except for media collusion.

Like with the story in the OP. Where's all the western media? Is the truth kryptonite to them?

A long with that, where are all the White Helmets that made these accusations? Where are they to corroborate their own story?

As Robert Fisk noted in his story for The Independent, they all got on the busses with the rebels and went to Idlib, no doubt to bear witness to Assad gassing folks up there just as he's winning as he did in Douma. /sarcasm

 

Here are a few quotes from Moon of Alabama about the false flag chemical attack:

A day after the incident the Salafi terrorists of Jaish al-Islam gave up and left the area under a ceasefire deal arranged with the help of the Russian military in Syria. The ceasefire deal does not allow the Syrian army to enter the area, only the Russian military police is allowed.

Russian military police immediately entered the area and investigated the house where, allegedly, people were killed by 'chemical weapons'. They found no evidence that such an event had taken place.

The attack came despite doubts in the Pentagon and elsewhere about what actually happened. High ranking British military generals have publicly doubted the claims of a Syrian 'chemical attack'.

The suburb where the alleged incident happened is only a few miles away from the center of Damascus. Journalists and camera teams walk all over the place without any protection and freely interview hospital personal. The OPCW has yet to reach the area. It claims that the security is insufficient.

Why were, allegedly, shots fired at the UN Security team but not on anyone else visiting the area?

No other organization reported of recent shots or explosions in Douma.

One gets the impression that certain circles fear the the OPCW could reach the area, talk to witnesses and confirm the claims made by doctors in the hospital as well as by many journalists that no 'chemical attack' took place. It would expose the attack on Syria as a reckless and unjustified war crime.

The various videos from terrorist supporters like the 'White Helmets' were unconvincing. They showed obviously arranged scenes of an alleged 'barrel bomb' and manipulated bodies of dead children that had been moved and decorated with shaving foam to superficially fit the claims of a 'chemical incident'. Another video showed people in a hospital being doused with water for no apparent reason.

The following picture is from the Syrian SANA and shows the injuries among civilians in Damascus by the Jaish al-Islam mortar attacks. The Guardian showed the same picture and falsely said: "Medics take a wounded man into hospital in Damascus after rockets were fired in Douma on 7 April."

Together with that, they said that the Medics are lying about the chemical attack not having taken place, and that they are being intimidated.



The pictured Red Crescent in Syria, founded in 1942, has 1,592 staff and some 6,000 volunteers. It is indeed the "the largest medical relief agency in Syria". But it is not the one the Guardian describes and quotes.

They quote from the Union of Medical Care and Relief Organizations which was founded in 2012. It consists of the Syrian American Medial Society (SAMS), which is funded by the CIA front USAID and lobbies for regime change in Syria, and the British-Syrian Medical Society which only works in 'rebel' held areas. SAMS and UOSSM are said to be Muslim Brotherhood fronts.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/04/syria-who-holds-up-the-opcw-investigation-in-douma.html#more​

 

Being a supporter of Ron Paul, I just listened to this, where he had on a brit, a notable brit, who after gov't service worked for the UN and even went to syria. His take on this supports what I have believed about this attack and other attacks. I don't expect any of the people who believe assad did the attack to watch it of course, for it is not what they really want to hear. Not like their minds were ever open in regards to this issue, and assad was convicted even before any attack took place. ha ha.




Yes and there you have it. Both the prior gov't and UN official, the brit and ron paul are russian trolls. Paid by russia to bring down the US. ha ha

 

Russia Insider has no connections to the Russian government, and was publicly condemned by Vladimir Putin and Lavrov for its antisemitism. Besides that, it has been criticized by respectable Russian sites for its unethical tactics from the time of it inception.

 

This is not the first time that the winning side has been accused without proof. The first time was with the airplane shoot down in Ukraine. At the time I was reading the Saker, and he said that the Ukrainian army was trapped and given a 24 hour ultimatum to surrender with certain terms. The next day he was waiting for the news about the surrender, when instead the headlines were all about the shoot.down of the airliner.

Another time was when the Syrian army was winning, and the terrorists needed help so they conducted a false flag chemical attack. Obama was ready to bomb Damascus to help them out, when Russia intervened. Had he bombed and the terrorists entered Damascus - a city packed with Christian and Alawite refugees, it would have become the biggest massacre in history. But it would make no difference to Washington. All that matters is having the media on their side to cover it up.

Later if was revealed in the Turkish parliament by the opposition, that the chemicals came from Turkey. They had their troops all lined up and ready to march into Syria. I recall that when Obama stopped the attacks, the Saudis were quite miffed at him for some time.

 

Glad to hear that.

 

Did he? I know he likes to think he's doing that. Then again, he likes to think he's an E.T. I usually just humour him.

 

Oh, you're back. I thought you went to change your avatar again, or is that new one of yours your way of humoring him?

 

This thread isn't about me.

 

You got that right. Now get back to your ludicrous double-fake theory. It's so very interesting.

 

My opinions have nothing to do with Russia as a nation, but rather have to do with the political ideology of Washington's one world order, and the means that are being used to bring it about. Their actions condemns them, the same way the political ideologies of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany were condemned by their actions.

In contrast to Washington's imposition of a one world order, I agree with Putin's beliefs and that of the political scientist and philosopher Alexander Dumas in that there is an innate difference between people in different cultures, and no one should impose their own standards on others. In other words, what might be good for the goose might not be good for the gander.

This doesn't mean as a Christian that I wouldn't want the world to follow Christ and his teachings, but that's up to the individual.

 

Ahhh yes there is. Dr. Paul Walker has a lot to say about this.

https://www.rt.com/shows/worlds-apart-oksana-boyko/424546-warfare-propaganda-russia-us/

 

But what about American or British experts on this topic? If they agree to be interviewed by RT, are they lying too?

https://www.rt.com/shows/worlds-apart-oksana-boyko/424546-warfare-propaganda-russia-us/

 

It is the obvious truth, actually. Riddle me this: If real White Helmets produced that silly video of yours, how did anyone get a hold of the footage to post online?

 

Good comments. Oksana didn't seem too happy with what he had to say.

 

That is why I do not turn away when it comes to RT. She can ask any question she likes but she does not control what she is told.

 

We have Trump and believe me, I want to believe the tale we were told and blame Assad. Trouble is, too much evidence shows up that this is a fake job and we fell victim to the story. Fortunately for us, what we bombed into rubbish is fine with me and does not hurt my feelings, no matter if we got it wrong. But we must be careful not to nail the wrong people and get tricked again.

 

I'm not sure which evidence you mean, but I think there's a lot of garbage going around, trying to hide the truth of it.

 

Evidence it was a fake job. We learn how the children were yelled at to go to the hospital only to find themselves filmed being washed in ways that I was very suspicious of ahead of other stories. It looked fake from day one.

 

Either way, we're relying on videos and claims that make their way to us online. We really don't have enough to go on to come to an informed conclusion either way. Seeing the lengths that some in Syria will go to in order to lie about it, I'm all the more skeptical of what we do see.

 

One America News, OAN, showed the very same thing. This was a staged event and everybody knows it.

 

No, an informed decision as you say, is that liars lie, and there is no bigger gang of liars than the US Department of Defense. They've been lying for decades at least. They lied to the court, under oath, in U.S. v. Reynolds back in 1953. They lied about Vietnam, they lied to Mary Tillman. They have a strong reputation for lying.