Im mostly irish, which means im part celt and part viking, and with just a touch of native american supposedly as well.
That's not really true either. Under the British Empire and European colonial expansion, they represented majorities all over the globe. Greater than 1 out of 3 people in the world's population were living in China or India, so if you want to talk about a very small area.
Really? Mideast, Far East? East? Americas, prior to say 1800s? What is the most common eye color? Which eye color is the rarest? Brown Eyes Brown eyes are the most common eye color in the world with over 55% of the world's population having brown eyes. Brown eye color is a dominant genetic trait, and is created by the presence of melanin in the eye. Over fifty percent of the world's population has brown eyes, with nearly all individuals from Africa and Asia sharing brown eye color. Brown eyes are typically darker than other eye colors, and they may even appear black in certain individuals. Hazel Eyes Hazel eyes are similar to brown eyes, although they are typically lighter in color, and have more of a green-yellow tint. Hazel eyes have a higher concentration of melanin (pigment) around the eye's border, which can result in a multi-colored appearance that varies between copper and green depending on the lighting. Most people estimate that around 5-8% of the world's population has hazel colored eyes. Blue Eyes Blue eyes are genetically recessive, and therefore much less common worldwide. Blue eyes are formed by the absence of pigments in the eye, where the blue color is formed by the scattering of light as it's reflected off the iris. While blue eyes are less common than brown eyes, they are frequently found from nationalities located near the Baltic sea in northern Europe. It's estimated that approximately 8% of the world's population has blue eyes. https://www.aclens.com/content/2025/Most-Common-Eye-Color
It depends on the moment you are referring to. The New Democratic Party has assured me I can be any gender, any race, anything I want. Can't understand why you would suggest that new standard has anything to do with the President.
Now you're trying to tell me I can't chose how I self identify my gender and race? The rules on the left are very confusing.
I read that the first time. I dismissed it because of it's indication it's author suffers from TDS. Outside of that, who are you to question how I self identify? You better check the rules, because violation can result in total annihilation from the judges who roam the alt-left.
Where did I say I questioned how you self identify? Why are you confused in all the posts here so far? Are you offended that you are a tRUMPer now? You know, a tRUMP supporter.
depends...was that 1% deep ancestry or recent?....recent ancestry reduces by 50% per generation, if one parent was Japanese you're 50% japanese, your child will be 25%, then 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125, 1.5% ....
Does this mean I can self identify with as a black woman? I think I'm starting to get this white male privilege thing you oppressive b*stards give me free money
also depends on which DNA lab does the test and what they're looking for and how much detail they offer...siblings can have different DNA results, one showing an ethnic link to elsewhere and the other nothing, it's random...a woman's DNA results will be different than a mans as a woman's ancestry can only be traced through female mitochondrial DNA(daughter/mother/grandmother)...my sisters results showed a connection to DNA in Nigeria, not unexpected we all have ancient DNA traced back to Africa...my DNA tests came back northern european, not unexpected, what was unexpected was Melanesian DNA but I'm not alone where I was born(netherlands) there was significant colonial contact with Melanesia; sailors, merchants, missionaries... grandmother's(father) family were missionaries...my sisters DNA test wouldn't reveal any Melanesian DNA because it was paternal DNA
I never the answered poll, including race as part of the question is redundant as there no races, race is a made up term that has no validity in biology...
Exactly, there is 1 race, the human race. Then there are ethnicities and skin colors. It's terrible our gov't wants to separate people based on skin color. And the RW thinks that is how the world should be separated because of that.
Why yes, of course. But white male privilege? While that is one of the few approved derogatory labels that can be used in New Democrat Party, it may violate self identification standards depending on the day of the week, and the phase of the moon. Remember, violations may result in public humiliation and personal and professional destruction.
That's just part of being a Democrat these days lol. It's the final destination if you don't die first.