If liberal socialist democrat can somehow make it impossible for a democrat to declare himself Caesar I wii include denying trump his national security declaration But we both know you are going to run wild the next time a dem is in the white house
not a liberal socialist, but the balls less congress, both parties, need to protect the rights afforded them via the constitution. As of now, only 1 more R needs to step up and do the correct thing and keep our country from moving close to Ceasar. run wild next time a dem? What does that mean? I have come to the conclusion you don't know much. Which is why I guess you make up things not said.
I thought you were admitting that the next democrat in the white house will declare a national emergency or maybe even martial law And you will be cheering him on
Wow... it’s the best you can do? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_the_United_States
yes, I figured that. It's why I said you just make things up. It's why you voted for and support tRUMP. 2 peas in a pod. I said nothing about the party of the prez, nor did I say anything about the next, I simply said future prez.
It depends on which wacko lefty gets th office They all speak the same language on the campaign trail but some are crazier than others
If you want to learn something, then go study the 2016 polling data before you spout off that same idiocy about the polls being inaccurate. The average of the polls said that Hillary would earn approximately 3.2% more of the vote than Donald Trump. She ended up with 2.1% more of the vote than Donald Trump. Now, if you want to argue that a national referendum on the issue of building trump's wall would be around 1-2% higher than the ~40% at which it has been polling for the last three years, I agree that is absolutely possible. If you want to argue that it would be higher than 50% or even just a higher number than those in opposition, then you are almost certainly spouting the same absurdist bullshit that allows trump to claim he had more people at his inauguration and would have won the popular vote but for three-five million illegal votes.
Egotistical he is, as has been every president we ever had with maybe the exception of Harding. A moron he is not. His intellect and brilliance shines through. He is considered a moron by emotion-driven Trump haters because it sounds good to them. Simply because some hate him does not make him a moron.
I agree with that.. a moron is generally somebody without the intelligence to do the job.. He's an idiot... somebody with the intelligence, but without everything else needed, starting with basic humanity and ending with horrible instincts..
No, I consider him a moron because he does not like to read, as per his own Secretary of State and because he spouts idiotic word salads AS A SINGLE SENTENCE like the following:
Poor syntax does not make one a moron. Saying you have visited all 57 states, though, is getting there.