House expands Civil Rights Act!!!

So in other words, you don't care about people and how they are treated.

Well too bad.

Other people do and that's why it has to be a LAW, to protect decent people from ignorant uncaring bums.

So follow the law.

 

A very similar thing happened to my grand daughter. When she finally got them evicted they stole the appliances.

 

Let's pass a law making it illegal to discriminate against people with extreme body odor or who constantly break wind. Then hopefully you can have a couple of these odorous people next to you at work.

See how stupid establishing endless classes of protected people can be?

 

The worst case of stripping a home of the appliances and carpets and all bathroom fittings was when a pal of mine, a CA Real Estate broker lost his home When Carter was president and the home was trashed too. What made it worse is the Broker had borrowed money he did not repay to do what? LMAO Fix up other homes that he then sold for profit.
*******************
Last case was i went to an auction with a pal when he bought a 2 story not far from Monterey. CA as a foreclosure. We had days prior entered the home with all appliances intact. Then the owner had hired a C-21 office to sell it for him. But the market was soft. I believe some carpets too had been removed. But it was still a great deal for the buyer. I do not recall the street name but it was in this hilly neighborhood off highway 101. PS no appliances and sinks left in the home. All vanished.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/P...40399ef04dc14!8m2!3d36.7757907!4d-121.6696689

 

So you are equating gays and other minorities with body odor and breaking wind.

And the right wonders why gays and other minorities stick with the Dems.

 

You didn't answer where you live.

My feeling is you don't even live here.

True?

 

Wrong

And your question is only asked because you lost the argument

I am more American than you

 

I did not lose any argument.

Your "argument" lost overwhelmingly many years ago.

So follow the law or go to jail.

 

Call me a republican. I do not have wings.

It does oppress owners of rentals. They must by law rent to blacks. Being black is not the problem due to other blacks being good tenants. But to get it, you need to rent just to blacks. My black clients rented to blacks that ripped them off. Congratulations for supporting blacks that rip off both whites and blacks.

I know you defend this by yapping about whites. We do not have remotely the problem with whites as we do with blacks.

When Trump got accused of not wanting to rent to Blacks, now do you understand why?

 

Yes you did

I proved you wish to support oppression and violation of individual rights.

I will oppose the law and fight for it's repeal

Everything Hitler did was legal and you share his motives more than any racist does

 

You support discrimination....

the vast majority of American do not.

You LOSE!

So not only do you lose, but you are the un-American one.

Sorry racists and bigots.

 

And you wonder why African Americans don't want to join up with you and your party?

You guys are hilarious.

 

Oh we get the cream of the crop Blacks and homosexuals.

http://www.logcabin.org/about-us/

ABOUT US

 

Reminds me of this scene...

 

Wrong

Every American supports it because every American does it including you


You only oppose it for a select few which IS OPPRESSION

I won the argument pages ago

 

But they do join us.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_Republicans

 

Oh God ,, this reminds me of the house with no toilets.

I had sold a home around 1975 and the Buyer called me to find out where are the Toilets. And all the light bulbs. Seller was white too.

 

The problem with your argument is that some aspect of it assumes that legality is a priori correct, and anybody who disagrees is just going to have to be whipped into submission.

It's another one of those lefty ideas where the state is inherently just, so the bigger the state, the better the state. So now you are forced to agree that when slavery was legal, it was perfectly just that slaves be caught and punished for their crime. It requires you to agree that slavery was just, while at the same time requires you to agree that slavery is not just now since slavery is no longer legal.

Would you care to address the rather obvious inconsistency in stating that slavery was just when it was legal, but unjust now that it is illegal?

 

I lecture Democrats that since 1933 they are famous for being the kings of making laws.
I get no flack from them of course.

It is easy to explain in a video that I often show but worse it shows their laws and regulations pilling up in huge piles.

Finally who whines all the time when we remove laws?

Democrats of course.

 

He has no rebuttal. <snicker>

 

Perfect example of the slippery slope fallacy.

 

How so? It's simply applying the logic that discrimination is wrong in hiring practices. We've already seen it with affirmative action, so it's not even close to a slippery slope. A slippery slope happens when you take one thing, then predict that it will cause something else to happen, and then another thing to happen, and another until the predicted final outcome has almost zero chance of being correct.

A rock fell on my car creating a scratch. If I take it to the mechanic, he'll charge me a ton of money to fix the scratch. Because it will cost so much money, I'll have to dip into the retirement account. If I dip into the retirement account, I'll be left with no money to retire. If I have no money to retire, I'll be forced to sleep on the street and panhandle for money.

 

Is it possible for a question to be an example of the slippery slope fallacy?

I easily can see how a statement could be. But a question?

 

Can he deny service to a straight white Christian because he doesn't like his sneakers?

 

So straight, white, christian, home schooling Trump supporters are protected from being kicked out under this law?