Feeling any more sympathetic to Meghan Markal after Oprah interview?

I have zero idea what this story is about, or why anyone cares. I guess he is a prince or something, and that is important for some reason. If he loves her, he should be with her. If he doesn't, he shouldnt.

 

Interesting that Harry talks about being "trapped" while in the royal family. He seems to have no awareness of how trapped he is ....in his current marriage. She is the dormant & controlling one.......and yet she plays the victim. ( or tries to)
About the "suicidal ideas".........did she not have any clue as to the mental health services available for those kinds of problems?? The frim might be outdated..........but the UK society is not.
Meanwhile Prince Phillip is in hospital and hardly a word of concern about "Archie's' great grandfather.
The whole focus seems to be about Meagan and her "feelings". Can they say that they handled their situation as maturely and knowledgeably as they could?? Or did they just plan to escape their situation ASAP............and was the intention to get back t o California as soon as they could. ( Her home turf) She certainly seems to need to control the narrative, and the situation.


Both seem immature and not too bright.

The best thing that could happen now is for them to fade from the media completely...........and live the "private" life they claim they want.

 

Piers Morgan steps down as co-host of 'Good Morning Britain' after complaints over his criticism of Meghan, Duchess of Sussex

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0.1dQKZwnj1qZpUJmQWIZck_8AnudpxS0U4HmG5ikJsIs

Now the casualties resulting from the public and sensational IV come down.

Royals are not exempt from criticism..........not in a free society.

 

Megan could never play second fiddle to anyone, so her intentions for appearing on Ophah had to have to be sinister - or at least I think so. She hated the fact that William was next in line for the throne, something she wanted for Harry and her own children, so she either had to get them kicked out of succession, or destroy the monarchy altogether.

The only way she knew she could do it, was by playing the race card. Since the British monarchy is the monarchy for all the commonwealth nations, she probably felt that if she aroused enough animosity, the African nations would rebel against them. This way Britain would either have to eliminate the monarchy altogether, or be forced to put Harry next in the line of succession.

Of course I'm just speculating - but I wouldn't put anything past her.

​

Poor Britannia! It no more rules the waves.
They've fallen hard and have become
the PC's latest slaves - Jeannette


​

 

And yet 48% of the British people said in a poll, that they want the government to remove Harry from the line of succession.

 

I would not put much past her either. Her motives are suspect. there was no need to air their dirty laundry in public this way. All she did is perpetuate the fodder for tabloids... This entire exit has her finger prints on it..........She has to control things........and found she could not at the "firm". Nor should she. So she opted out as this way she can control the finances, and now what she says . Harry's role has been "supporting" her regardless of what she wanted.and he gave up his family and a lot more for this. He might not even realize all the losses yet. He too has had emotional problems in the past.

The UK has good mental health services and excellent psychiatrists.. If she wanted help..........she should have contacted a professional......... and done it on the QT .............or she could have gone public.........as she is prone to do. Help IS available IF one really wants it.

There are things in what she says that just don't wash ...But she seems to have gotten at least some revenge by making all this public.

as far as the color if Archies skin............. plenty of folks have wondered the same thing. What is the big deal?/ It is BIOLOGY.. Maybe the little girl will be dark. So bloody what?? again: It is BIOLOGY!!
It is apparent that Meagan is unable to handle a lot of things in a mature and healthy manner. She defaults to a victim position.
She should be in long term therapy with a private psychiatrist.. as she seems to have a number of unresolved issues.

 

Black Brits say racism is a fact of daily life. Meghan and Harry were just 'laying it bare.' (msn.com)
If you see the baby Archie, You will see that he is mostly white, Harry is white and Meghan looks mostly white and she's partly African American. All I see it that two people in love with each other and married in matrimony. Simple as that.

 

Were they real criticisms of Pier Morgan, or were the complaints 'bots' so as to knock him off the air for political or nefarious purposes?

 

Good question, Jeannette One can only speculate..

 

Why did Piers Morgan step down? Was it because having to do with Harry and Meghan in some way? I guess it was. Morgan had no business doing something like that.

 

If being in love and together was all that mattered to them, then they should have shut up and not gone on Oprah and been grateful for the elaborate wedding and everything else she was given by the Queen. Instead they're trying to destroy the monarchy by causing race problems.

A little logic here: If Megan's mother was white and everything else about Megan and her family was exactly the same, would she have been accepted by the British people? No, she wouldn't have been, since it's a very class structured society. So why would Megan be making it a race problem, unless there's a nefarious intent behind it.

 

DEAR @Jeannette
Race and Class are associated in the Brit system



Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz doesn't count.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_of_Mecklenburg-Strelitz


Toi's Moi



I wonder what would have happened had one of
those Princes married an observant Jewish lady?
And the Queen detests garlic too

 

That's probably the way things are.

 

I don't doubt her story; I just question why she felt the need to put it out there. She had zero clue of what she was getting herself into. That's careless due diligence on both Harry's part and hers. He should have prepped her way better. How Harry couldn't have prepared her, telling her all the crap his mother went through; it's plain old irresponsible. He should have given her the top three accurate documentaries about the royals and made them homework for her, or something. She said she went into the marriage not knowing anything about the royal family. If I were in the royal family; that would give me pause. I knew tons about my husband's history and how his mid-west family operated. That's just normal couple stuff. So her pretending, "oh, I had no idea," doesn't do her any favors, really. I'd be appalled if my future husband didn't want to know anything about how I was raised and my family dynamics.

She acknowledge the Queen & Prince Phillip always treated her well.

You can't do an Oprah interview and claim you want to be out of the spotlight at the same time. I only saw about 15 minutes of it. That was enough to get the flavor.

 

I thought that when you're part of the Royal Family, there are some things expected of you and have to abide by these rules. There will be time when some of these rules that will be broken and whagt happen when they are? To me it remains to be seen.

 

Piers is a critic. And has criticized Meagan in the past. This IV has blown everything up. Perhaps that was the motivation behindit. Meagan doesnot want a quiet private life. She loves drama, and theater ............ and being the center of attention. Now she rally is.
Those sympathetic toher...... have put pressure on Piers ..........for his critical approach / style in his program.

It is the younger generation that is sympathetic t o her. and are making their voices known. Piers has the freedom to say what he feels .....just like anyone else. But when something explodes........ some heads must role.


IF they want privacy.......they would not be active on social media. eg: Instagram

Their words and behavior are out of sync..

 

No Seriously, Piers Morgan Hates Meghan Markle – The History Behind His Vitriol (thewrap.com)
There's no wonder why Piers Morgan despises Meghan Markle

 

Well, the king or queen is the head of the Church of England, so it would be a problem. But then there's Kate, and her mother is or was Jewish. Does that make them eligible to move to Israel or not?

The big problem with Diana was that Dodi Fayed was Muslim and Diana wanted another child. Any child they had would have been Muslim and therefore a half sibling to the future king. I think the MI6 killed them. They are experts at those things. Dodi's father thinks so too. It was just too convenient.

As for Kate, the Queen did not approve of her mother working and I don't think her family was ever invited to the palace at Christmas - yet Megan's mother was.

GREETINGS!​

At least I had nothing to gain,
not money or elusive fame,
can those in charge now say the same?

My problem was I feared my head
that I might lose it and be dead
and gave away my rights instead.

And this is why you foolish folk
are looked upon now as a joke
controlled by every criminal bloke

who can buy the media - Jeannette ​

 

.

Markle may single-handedly destroy the British monarchy... and the degenerate compromisers deserve it.

 

Meghan Markle loves those who she can benefit from, and drops them when she has no more use for them - even her own father. She dropped Piers Morgan and he hates her - as does everyone who feels used.

 

Harry had better remain useful to her

 

She's an ACTRESS.

 

EXACTLY!!! and therefore should have been able to handle those royal duties with little effort.

 

I ain't think he's in danger of starvation, even still.

 

She should have been able to wing it. I guess she's a crap actress?