The MSM is at it again.... NY Times claimed Gaetzs requested a blanket pardon. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/06/us/politics/matt-gaetz-trump-pardon.html no named sources ABC News decided to join in the attack. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...rom-trump-sources/ar-BB1fn3y2?ocid=uxbndlbing and again... no named sources. However, a named source has come out to share that it is all FAKE NEWS. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/546900-trump-denies-gaetz-asked-for-blanket-pardon President Trump just shot that down. The NY Times added Trump's direct source refutation at the bottom of their "journalistic" article.
Taking the "word" of Trump (A well-known 24/7 Pathological LIAR) to "make a point"? Trump Lied More Than 30,000 Times During His Presidency https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/01/donald-trump-thirty-thousand-lies/ Yup! Trump Said it! Gotta be true!
Proving once again that NYT = MSM = Fake News. "Baquet said the paper shouldn’t allow itself to be edited by Twitter outrage. When it was his turn to speak, Sulzberger cited a statistic claiming that only a small number of people tweeting about Times stories actually clicked on them, suggesting many readers judge the stories before actually reading them. Last week’s headline reignited an ongoing media discussion—both inside and outside the paper—about how to properly cover Trump’s racist statements. During Monday’s meeting, Baquet, the first African-American executive editor of the paper, emphasized that rather than simply labeling the president or other leaders “racist” or using euphemisms like “racially charged,” the paper should demonstrate instances of racism through concrete examples." THE DAILY BEAST, ‘MISSTEPS’, NYT Top Editor: Trump Racism Headline Was a ‘F*cking Mess’, In a lengthy town-hall meeting on Monday, the paper’s top brass addressed a bevy of recent controversies centering around the Times’ coverage of Trump, race, and politics., By Lachlan Cartwright, Maxwell Tani, Lloyd Grove, 08.12.19. https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-y...baquet-trump-unity-headline-was-a-fcking-mess When will they ever learn?
You failed to provide a source showing that the NYT told you that. I bet they didn't. "In 2017, the Opinion section published an editorial that drew a link between an advertisement from Sarah Palin's political action committee and a 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona, in which six people were killed and then-Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was severely wounded. There is, in fact, no evidence that the shooter saw the advertisement, much less that he was motivated by it. The Times issued a correction, but Palin filed a lawsuit against the newspaper. Palin's suit was initially dismissed but an appeals court revived it in August" CNN, New York Times' botched Kavanaugh story the latest in series of blunders, By Oliver Darcy, CNN Business, September 17, 2019. The NYT is not a reliable source.
The idea of taking Trump's word with no verification flies in the face of years of significant and well identified lies over the last 5 years.
If you want to identify yourself as a victim of MSM brainwashing that's your call. Trump lied like every other president, but when the NYT and ABC have no named sources and Trump debunks them, he's been solid in that aspect virtually every time, but so many of you Leftists are caught up in TDS that you never figured that out.
Trump is notorious for expressing his blunt, often obnoxious honest opinions regarding facts and courses of action. I guess we are supposed to be shocked that he is not always right. So far there is no evidence that Trump, as opposed to most professional politicians, is a liar.
That's just plain disgusting. No other president in our HISTORY has coordicnated an attack on our democracy through months of absolute lies concerning our elections. He PROVED beyond all doubt that not even AMERICA is of value when compared to his possible personal gain through lies and deception against our very foundation. Then, YOU come along and suggest we take his "word" for something!!! Who do you think we are???
LOL, right?? Hell, he hired that batshit crazy attorney that said Trump supporters are idiots if they thought taking her seriously with her election fraud lies kraken lawsuits. Trump hired her to simply LIE. LMAO
No evidence Trump is a liar? He literally said he was taking HCQ as a prophylaxis and then one day stopped taking it because he finished his course. Because that's how a prophylaxis works right? You can just stop taking it.
Btw--What is up with Editorializing the Thread Title? Here is your Thread Title: NY Times / ABC News Claim Gaetz Requested Pardon - Trump Speaks Out - FAKE NEWS!!! (And even 3 !!! Count 'em 3 !!! Exclamation Points! YIPPIE!!!). Once again, Here is your Thread Title: NY Times / ABC News Claim Gaetz Requested Pardon - Trump Speaks Out - FAKE NEWS!!! The only article in your OP that discusses Trump's statement is this link: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/546900-trump-denies-gaetz-asked-for-blanket-pardon Which is Titled: Trump denies Gaetz asked him for blanket pardon So, once again, what is up with editorializing the thread title? If you are going to do that, then this thread belongs in PO&B. There are additional rules for "Latest U.S and World News" and "Current Events": All thread titles must be copy/pasted from source article titles. ___________ Now, that we have got that out of the way, once again to address the incredibly misguided assertion in the OP: Claiming that Trump (A Serial LIAR who has told 10s of Thousands of Documented LIES) is any kind of credible "source", is beyond misguided. At this point, given Trump's Egregiously Pathetic History of Hideous Self-Serving LIES: Nobody should take anything that Trump says at face value.
More partisan baloney. Everyone knows that Trump is remarkably blunt and honest whenever he shares his thoughts publicly. It is probably one of his weaknesses. OTOH, virtually everyone knows that professional politicians, and the MSM are very dishonest.
If trump denied it, he’s lying. Gaetz thought he could ape trump. He certainly got the degenerate bit right.
For start the source could come forward and provide evidence of how they know of the pardon request the report claims. That would include identifying themselves. But we are long past the point of having any actual verifiable sources or anything verifiable at all. It's simply not a requirement by any news outlet standards anymore.