When Chauvin is acquitted...

Wait...you mean the videos he shared are nowhere near the same situations as the Floyd case??? What a shocker.

 

But not ones for the defense.

Every single one of the publicize cases where the police killed a suspect, they resisted first. When they resist, the situation gets out of hand.
As far as who I doubt, you are making stuff up.

These were more senior officer with less likelihood to have the same exposure.

Just what I said in the previous quote.

 

All 3 of those videos are not the technique chauvin used. None of those officer kneeled on the neck of a subdued, handcuffed face down laying suspect for over 9 minutes, 3 of which he was dead.

 

No, but the defense questioned them.

So the police aren't trained to handle people who resist arrest? If they resist the situation is automatically out of control even though the police should be experts at handling the situation ??????????

What? Like """they ARE supposed to be the experts handling the situation (experts that you don't ever want doubted even though you doubt other experts)"""

Did I make that up ??? Are you saying that the police aren't supposed to be experts at what they do !!!!!????

OMGAWDDUH!!!!

They are SENIOR officers, they worked there way up!!

OMGAWD, did you think SENIOR officers are hired off the street with NO police experience !!!??

NOW who is making things up ???? OR REALLY REALLY CONFUSED ??

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

And on a COMPLETELY unrelated note
Q: What does a Scotsman wear under his kilt

A: Lipstick (thanks to Craig Ferguson)

 

Do we know why things such as his DNA being found on the pill, and whether or not he said "I ate too many drugs" is relevant, given that the autopsy demonstrates that he had drugs in his system?

 

It's not a fair test though is it, because the force isn't going to be the same. Only the positioning can be replicated.

 

And your claim of murder was gibberish from the get go.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Your hero, Chauvin, had 9 minutes to kill Floyd....but if you believe cops should be judge , jury and executioner I'm sure you'll think that's a slit second decision....





Your defense of a murder has gotten you to the point of gibberish...

LOL, so you have no real response....and hey, have ya compared your credentials with Dr. Tobin's yet ???

You know, the guy you called an" ignorant tool "

 

Let me explain how it works. The prosecution selects experts who support their case. It is likely they talked to a number of experts, some of whom likely came to different conclusions. They will not call those who disagreed.

The defense will do the same. It is almost one hundred percent certain that they will come up with an equally prestigious expert who will discount Dr Tobin. It will then be up to the jury to determine who they believe.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
LOL, so you have no real response....and hey, have ya compared your credentials with Dr. Tobin's yet ???

You know, the guy you called an" ignorant tool "

Let me explain how it works...no testimony after Dr. Tobin's makes him an "ignorant tool"....


Let me explain how it works, you have NO idea if they can discount what Tobin said...




….have ya compared your credentials with Dr. Tobin's yet ???

 

What part of what I said do you believe is not true?

 

Do you intend to compare your credentials with the expert witnesses the defense call?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Let me explain how it works...no testimony after Dr. Tobin's makes him an "ignorant tool"....


Let me explain how it works, you have NO idea if they can discount what Tobin said...




….have ya compared your credentials with Dr. Tobin's yet ???

Well, for starters : "" It is almost one hundred percent certain that they will come up with an equally prestigious expert who will discount Dr Tobin"

HOWEVER, I didn't say it wasn't true in the post of mine you quoted..... It seems you just couldn't address what I actually posted so had to segue off into something else...

 

Why TF should I? I'm not the one who DIDN'T watch the trial claiming things...

I didn't call Dr. Tobin an ignorant tool...only an anti-Science person would do that..

 

That does not have a thing to do with it. Are you claiming intending to compare your credentials with the defense experts?

And neither did I.

 

But, lets look at it a different way. Do you think your credentials are sufficient to challenge Dr Tobin even if he was wrong?

 

NO, but YOU responded to this post :
FoxHastings said: ↑
LOL, so you have no real response....and hey, have ya compared your credentials with Dr. Tobin's yet ???

You know, the guy you called an" ignorant tool """"


...which was directed at another poster....ya stuck your nose in and it got bitten off

 

I never claimed they were.

It was NOT I who called Dr. Tobin an "ignorant tool".

It was not I who said his testimony would be found wrong by the prosecution experts.

It was not I who claim things about the trial after NOT watching it.

It wasn't me, it was YOU who claimed high ranking police officials didn't have any experience ( a really silly thing to say)

 

Then why ask that question of me? It is a meaningless question.

Neither did I.

To say otherwise is to claim that he is infallible.

Neither did I.

 

YES, you did say that high ranking police officials didn't have experience.....and are now just denying it once you realized it was a silly thing to say especially since you did NOT watch the trial and hear the credentials listed for every expert and high ranking police official.


Now you're just floundering around thinking denying everything is an 'argument".

 

The defense has nowhere near the resources of the prosecution, but, as the prosecution begins to wrap up it's case, it's clear that the Defense has done very well.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/04/the-chauvin-trial-so-far.php

 

Show me where I said that.

No. I am pointing out that the defense has not presented their side of the story.

 

Not the 9ne I called an ignorant that would be the MMA tool. By the way there are other images of showing that Chauvin's knee was across Floyd's shoulder blade and above but not on his neck. That video came up during the cross exam of the police academy trainer.