The New Climate Reality

It's all BS, a cover for financial theft and running out of oil (seems I have run out of wordfluff too - keeping it short & succinct....
Everything these days are in short supply)

It's very late in the day people, if you haven't prepped yet you better get started ASAP....it's going to get real very soon. And make sure you add Chlorine Dioxide to your preppers med kit not only for clean water but for anything bacterial or viral too, health staff are walking out because of Vax mandates and soon the only one who can help you medically is yourself...

 

There you go on your authoritarian rant, again. Too bad you don't do some critical thinking on this subject.

 

In order to believe in climate a change catastrophe hypothesis from too much CO2 in the atmosphere, I need actual data which shows the hypothesis is reasonable.

It would also be useful if environmentalists who believed that too much CO2 in the 'sphere causes imminent climate change catastrophe believed in evolution.

 

Critical thinking ? That’s the phrase of the day to cover up the arrogance of deniers of climate change.

 

And what would you do with it with superior “critical thinking skills” ?

 

I wonder if the subject matter had anything to do with his quote ?

Wow. A declaration backed by critical thinking and a rejection of authoritarianism.

 

Albert Einstein believed in man made climate change. That’s a fact based upon critical thinking.

 

And there is literally no evidence that extinction is going to happen. Zero. So why trot it out every time folks like you lose this conversation?

 

Nope.
Gregory Wrightstone: exposing the mass extinction lie
2019 › 05 › 27 › gregory-wrightstone-exposing-the-mass-extinction-lie
stunning analysis of these claims by Gregory Wrightstone. This made a big impact at Wednesday’s House ... By Gregory Wrightstone at his website, 13 May 2019.

 

You're not keeping up.

Antarctic Sea Ice Grows 2 Million Sq. Km – Area As Big As Saudi Arabia. And: Hamburg Spring Arriving Later…

By P Gosselin on 28. March 2021

Antarctic sea ice grows 2 million square kilometers in 4 years… It’s hard to back up the statement: Global warming is global. Some places have seen warming over the past 40 years (e.g. Arctic), but other places have not. Antarctica definitely has not been playing along with the man-made global warming hoax. (Yes, man has […]

 

You're not responding to my argument, that the conclusions you are making are based on the data of just 10 months out of 420 months, and so a total joke. While my conclusion is based on the average of 420 months.

Just repeating what you previously said without being able to argue against me, is going to be accepted as defaulting against my argument.

 

There is a big hole in the ozone layer above Antarctica. Man made by the way.

 

Rant on.

 

Critical thinking skills dictate that environmental science hasn't proven too much CO2 in the atmosphere causes imminent climate change catastrophe.

Environmental science hasn't even proven that CO2 is a much dastardlier trapper of heat in the atmosphere than water vapor. BTW, greenhouse gases in earth's atmosphere consist of approx. 95% water vapor and less than 5% CO2.

 

It’s getting wearing spoon feeding low information critical thinkers but here goes……again.

There is plenty written by research FACILITIES on why very small increases in the smaller amounts of CO2 has an important effect on not only trapping of heat as a trace gas compared to water vapor but how it actually plays a roll in the amount of water vapor which we have little control over.

Research also where C02 is in the atmosphere and how that plays a role in greenhouse gases. You never mentioned these things and others.

Your critical thinking skills are sadly lacking because your comments are low information woo woo speculation. . . .All his results in extremely low information “critical thinking”

There are other important low info comments you make, like global warming alarmist are only using science inferred by the “climate science or environmental science “ experts, even to the point of me hearing that it’s only the climate science people at places like Harvard who are the only influence on our government and like…the ENTIRE WORLD of gov , industry and education.

These are really strange uses of “critical thinking”

 

If you do have critical thinking skills, wouldn’t they dictate that you have more information and facts from the experts before you even embarrass yourself by making false claims….just asking.

This why non deniers don’t post anything off the top of our cranium. I refer to the real INSTITUTIONAL experts…..not yours.

 

Ha ha

The data is there for anyone to read.

Try Google.

 

What is your point ? Maybe you thought it had to get warmer EVERYWHERE in order for the average temps to increase….

One indication of GW is the increase in temperature EXTREMES even though the MEANS are changing.

MEANS is a statistical term for mathematical average of a set of numbers.

Please do more research in this area instead of just assuming too much by this.

 

Here’s the climate reality. The earth’s climate is naturally cyclical and these cycles are unpredictable and there’s nothing we can do about it.

 

That data is based on computer models, not reality.

 

Like where ? The only models we see are misinterpreted. Ever piece of data presented in threads , doesn’t say what deniers claim…..so where is yours ?

Computer models ? Do you know that computer models use REAL DATA. Maybe you didn’t know that. Interpolation and extrapolation are used to generate graphs from REAL data. They make it easier to read….it doesn’t change the data.

 

So what?

 

What "10 months" are you talking about? My conclusions are based on the entirety of the graph 1979-2021, especially everything since 2016.

 

That idea of what "global" means IS the hoax.

Climatologists have NEVER said that Earth's warming will be evenly spread across the planet. In fact, they clearly demonstrate over and over again that is NOT what happens.

Yet, we keep hearing ridiculous claims that some temperature change in one region somehow means that climate change is contraindicated.

 

I was replying to a post, #1481, that was specifically about Antarctic ice. Please follow the discussion if you plan to comment.