New York AG Sues Trump Family for Financial Fraud

I didn't vote for a man in the last election. I voted for a woman. And your favorite wannabe dictator has just as many dementia credentials as Biden. Hell, the dude couldn't even recognize Giuliani when he was sitting directly in front of him. He couldn't even remember what country his own father was born in.

My candidate got no such kickbacks. But do you mean Biden? I'd ask for evidence, but that is clearly a language you do not speak. And, no, the "big guy" email isn't very good evidence. I can explain why if there are still people desperate enough to follow that brainwashing.

My candidate did no such thing. But do you mean Biden? Unlike your favorite wannabe dictator, Biden has never been accused of having sex with a minor.

Trump hired one of the most virulent racists I've ever seen to be part of his WH. But yeah, bitch and moan about a parade while ignoring relevant facts.

I'm sorry you don't care about the facts. I'll continue to do so. Your refusal to do so certainly explains your political preferences.

 

Please explain how any of this is a “corrupt prosecution@?

 

liberals have known for decades about trump inc, AG barr would not indict a sitting president and RW NEVER mentions that tidbit

 

It’s great that they’re going after the whole crime family and not just the ringleader.
And we still have all the other indictments coming from his Georgia coup attempts and his stolen classified materials scandal.
A lot of repubs are waking up to what a crook trump really is.

 

Like I said, no evidence. If there was a crime, this would be a criminal case, not a civil suit.

 

New York sues Donald Trump......... <- forum link to the answer

 

NYS Attorney General:

I have a MAJOR announcement.

Will she stop crime?

Will she keep criminals locked up?

Will she announce that the hatchet guy will be thrown in jail?

"I be suin' Trump again!"

"Datz what I be doin'"

 

Yeah?? Name 2....

Are you seeing repubs coming out today with that slant??

They've known since Day 1.... They don't care...

 

Civil suits don't have evidence??? Is that what your nonsense can be boiled down to?

Please try and stay out of the big boy legal discussions... Better for you and better for us...

 

The Frivolous Suit Du Jour....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

You mean like your “facts” about Baxter? No thanks.

 

Desperation to hide from the facts acknowledged. Thanks for the white flag.

 

The woman literally ran on getting Donald trump as part of her platform.

She’s not prosecuting a crime she found. She’s trying to find a crime to prosecute not because he’s guilty but because she wants to fill a campaign promise.

 

She isn't involved in the criminal investigation. She's on the civil side. The criminal side has already indicted Trump's business.

 

Trump hasnt been the sitting President for over 1 1/2 years.

 

You didn’t present any facts lol. You made the claim you didn’t vote for Biden and voted for Jerg. Well I can’t pull your voting history and i highly doubt you’d show it. What I do know is you’ve spent FAR more time here shining that Biden turd than you have Jerg.

So honestly I don’t care who you claim to have voted for. I care who you spend your time supporting directly and indirectly in this forum. And that ain’t Jerg or the Green Party.

Second of all, don’t worry, there will be plenty of evidence when we hold our public investigation on primetime national television of Biden and his cohorts where we only present evidence that makes them look guilty and we refuse to present any evidence that is exculpatory. We will make sure to selectively edit testimony to make sure none of it which is beneficial to Biden and the Dems is shown to the public. And we will do all of that while we have sitting members of congress state day in and day out repeatedly that they’re unequivocally and definitively guilty of crimes like treason.

Don’t worry. You’ll see your evidence.

 

I already sourced you where SHE brought it into criminal investigation. Whether she sourced that out to someone else is irrelevant.

 

On THIS issue of the thread she was in charge of the criminal investigation. And with no crime she is suing him civilly for fraud. And yet, none of the parties he is alleged to have defrauded are suing. Probably because the banks have been paid back and have no damages.

 

[/quote]There's not a way for me to show it, just as there is no way for you to show yours. But if you prefer to live in fantasy land, you go ahead. Can't say there's a big change there. I guess I should just assume that you actually voted for Biden and are just trying to make Trump voters look as bad as possible.

And you are welcome to your nonsensical hobbies.

Lol, dude, you just admitted that your above fantasy would be "selectively edited." You admitted you are hungry for an unfair trial. Good job.

I've been waiting for your side to provide evidence since the last election. You've failed then, and you'll probably fail now, but if you finally found something, you let me know.

 

Vance and Bragg were on the criminal side. James was/is on the civil.

*Gasp* Suing him civilly when the civil part was what she was focused on?!?!?!? Say it ain't so!

Pssst . . . except the State of NY. Remember?

So you are going to be the first one to take me up on my friendly wager, then? All you'd be risking is $5 to charity. Yet every time I offer a wager like this, Trump supporters flee in terror and hide. Wonder why?

 

No remember? It’s not a trial. So we don’t have to present all the evidence. We can only present evidence that makes them look guilty on tv and not present the evidence that makes him look innocent on tv. We can selectively edit anything we’d like because it’s a made for tv special “investigation” and we have to make sure we adhere to time restrictions. And anyway don’t worry even if we selectively edit, that’s fine because it’s not a trial and if it actually went to trial they would see the whole testimony. Nevermind that we aren’t going to bring charges in the end so it will never see a trial.

It’s not unfair right? I mean y’all set the precedent it wasn’t just earlier this year.

 

I'm sure you are having a lot of fun with your fantasy. I'll be here in reality if you ever want to join me. The weird rant you are on has nothing to do with the topic.

 

Well you asked for evidence. We don’t have it yet because the democrat cronies in the house and senate are protecting Biden. But they won’t be able to soon.

 

I appreciate you admitting that, unlike James, your complaints are completely lacking in evidence.

 

And he was doing SO WELL recently, too

SNIP
“I’m not even sure that she has a good case against Trump himself, but what ultimately persuades me that this is a political hit job is that she grossly overreaches when she tries to drag the children into this.”

Trump’s adult children did have roles in the former president’s businesses, Barr said, “but this is his personal financial statement, prepared by the CFO, accounting firms were involved in it. … The children aren’t going to know the details of that, nor are they expected in the real world to do their own due diligence and have it reviewed independently.”
ENDSNIP

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bill-barr-criticizes-ny-ag-184530986.html

Poor widdle kiddies...

If they didn't know what pops was up to, they should have said that at their depositions, instead of TAKING THE 5TH!!.... Bill....