Ukrainian military deliberately executed over 10 Russian POWs

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Bill Carson, Nov 22, 2022.

  1. Tofiks

    Tofiks Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is not some computer game as you think it is. What exactly a million Chinese will do in Alaska? Die from hunger? Why do you think that they even will get to shore? There can be 100 000 000 Chinese in Russian taiga, but without unreal huge fleet, proper air support and supply, they will just die.
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2022
    zoom_copter66 likes this.
  2. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    IDK. After capturing Alaska, they could bring them in on a bunch of cargo ships lol. The distance is short so you can sardine pack them
     
  3. zoom_copter66

    zoom_copter66 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    17,314
    Likes Received:
    8,917
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Much of China's equipment was Russki knock offs .....and their war playbook was based on Russian battle theory.....after seeing Russian equipment being destroyed on an industrial scale in Ukraine....and it's battle theory/capability destroyed on the same industrial scale ....the Chinos will surely toss all that out....before attempting any such schemes.
     
  4. Tofiks

    Tofiks Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And to Alaska all these millions also will get with several packed cargo ships? I guess They will just stop in port as tourists, right? And Americans will just watch and wait, while all of them will get out in the port and then raise their hands? You don't think it's ridiculous?
     
  5. zoom_copter66

    zoom_copter66 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    17,314
    Likes Received:
    8,917
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    First...they gotta capture Alaska....you realize there's 2 large AFB ....Elmendorf&Eielson?....tons of B52s,with cruise missiles, dozens of F22/35s, with Apache attack helos....and several hundred nukes....good luck.
     
  6. Tofiks

    Tofiks Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They can have the best equipment in the World, they just can't bring it to US and use it there.
     
    zoom_copter66 likes this.
  7. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No. If you read properly, I said the real invasion would capture Alaska. Then after Alaska is captured, the Chinese would send over cargo ships packed with untrained conscripted civilians with the objective to surrender.
     
  8. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And you do realize that those illegals could be exterminated at will don't you?
     
  9. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    At least you're not babbling about imaginary Russian super weapons.
     
  10. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    So we will exterminate millions of unarmed prisoners of war? Will we built death factories to do this?
     
  11. Tofiks

    Tofiks Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Aa, ok. And how much solders China is capable to land there in "real invasion"? Several thousand, I guess?
     
  12. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    America won't resort to using nukes on Russian soil, or on their own like this unless they are backed into a corner. As far as other things China has a navy and an airforce too. Pluss carrier killer missiles. For the cost of a single aircraft carrier, they could have enough missiles to whipe out our entire navy 10× over.

    It will be a massive naval battle for sure. But ultimately China would probably win because of the proximity to the shore and more advanced antinship missiles. Plus they have their S400 and S500 which China is currently looking to buy. So a large areal battle will probably not happen.
     
  13. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Realistically? If they fully commit, maybe 50,000? Maybe 30,000? Maybe a little more?

    But there are about 5,000 troops stationed in Alaska.
     
  14. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    being "
    No conventional weapons would do the trick. Be reasonable @Fallen. And what is so special about them being "unarmed"?
     
  15. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Prove it. You can't of course.
     
  16. Tofiks

    Tofiks Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But this kind of invasion can't pass unnoticed. And as I said, they even will not get to shore and lend these thousand in one wave. It will be difficult to defeat even 5000 US troops there.
     
    Dayton3 likes this.
  17. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    So we'll line up a thousand unarmed prisoners of war at a time and shoot them with machine guns? And we'll do that 1000 times?

    Lol. The global outcry would be great. US would instantly shatter the image that we have been cultivating.

    We might even be sanctioned like Russia. Lol
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2022
  18. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You do remember (I hope) that you have just described those "millions of unarmed prisoners of war" as "invading the United States". You do realize that in "invasion" in a hostile act by definition don't you?
     
  19. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You've described them as invading the U.S. What would be wrong with us doing that then?
     
  20. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Prove that America won't resort to using nukes on Russia or their own land when the war fists starts?

    Lol.

    Or are you talking about carried killer missiles?

    Let's say each missile cost 2 million.

    A US Carrier cost 14.3 billion

    14.3 billion divided by 2 million is 7,150

    US has a total of 490 shift. From small boats. To submarines. To destroyers. To Aircraft carriers.

    7,150/490=14.59

    So for the price of 1 carrier. China could whipe out entire navy 14 times over.

    I said 10 times. Because not all missiles would hit.
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2022
  21. Bill Carson

    Bill Carson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2021
    Messages:
    6,442
    Likes Received:
    5,085
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well your country was carved out of Russian lands so you ought to be grateful to even have a country now.
     
  22. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why should I prove that? I never claimed it.
     
  23. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why should I prove that? I never claimed it.
     
  24. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yeh. And I know it's a war crime to kill unarmed soldiers who are legitimately surrendering
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2022
    Bill Carson likes this.
  25. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,519
    Likes Received:
    6,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What makes you think a single (or even a group) of anti ship missile could "kill" a supercarrier?
     

Share This Page