Ukrainian military deliberately executed over 10 Russian POWs

There are Russian lands, which belongs to some exact ethnic group? And why where is Russia lands, not Latvian lands? Where is Latvian lands then?

 

It's "the ukraine". You know, the place full of nazis that everyone says isn't full of nazis. Some of these shitbags are even getting nazi symbols put on their grave stones.

 

Because that's what they are designed to do.


The DF-ZF HGV operates in a different manner from normal ballistic missiles or even intercontinental ballistic missiles in the first place. Rather than firing and landing in a normal arc, the DF-17's HGV suppresses its trajectory and accelerates to reach Mach 5.

Due to its suppressed, lower altitude trajectory, intercepting the glide vehicle with ABM shielding becomes far harder and more complex than that of a conventional re-entry vehicle. This is further complicated, as the gliding makes the DF-ZF far more maneuverable; extending both its range and avoiding potential ABM shielding.

 

I was talking about a hypothetical invasion by the chines.

 

Prove it.

 

The DF-ZF HGV operates in a different manner from normal ballistic missiles or even intercontinental ballistic missiles in the first place. Rather than firing and landing in a normal arc, the DF-17's HGV suppresses its trajectory and accelerates to reach Mach 5.

Due to its suppressed, lower altitude trajectory, intercepting the glide vehicle with ABM shielding becomes far harder and more complex than that of a conventional re-entry vehicle. This is further complicated, as the gliding makes the DF-ZF far more maneuverable;[9] extending both its range and avoiding potential ABM shielding.

And now China has the DF-27

According to previous estimates, the DF-27 has a range comparable to that of the DF-4 or DF-4A, at 4,500 km to 7,000 km, and is likely to carry a hypersonic warhead being developed and tested to strike the U.S. mainland or a Hawaii naval base. The ballistic missile shown in the photo, however, uses a hypersonic glide combat section similar to that of the DF-17, but with a longer body than the latter, implying a longer range.

 

And has the DF-27 ever sank (or even hit) a carrier? Or anything for that matter. As usual you are attributing massive amounts of military prowess to an utterly unproven weapon system.

 

Wow.

 

I'll take that as a "no" to my question of you.

Thank you for your "honesty"

 

"Have you ever seen an ICBM incinerate a city? As usual you are attributing massive amounts of military prowess to an utterly unproven weapon system."

Is there a clown emoji?

 

Maybe show these "symbols on gravestones"?....Bill?

 

No but atomic weapons dropped by bombers has incinerated a city.

And plenty of ballistic missiles (V-2s and SCUDs) have hit cities.

So you post is as stupid as it is inaccurate.

 

Those were bombs. Have you ever seen an icbm do this? It must be unproven concept.

I mean, they obviously didn't test it a bunch of times or anything. To see how fast it goes. How it behaves. What kind of warheads it can have. The effects of that warhead. Etc

Obviously China is making and equipping them because they don't work

 

If you knew anything (which you don't) you would know that the nuclear warheads in bombs and those in ICBMs are basically the same concept wise.

and China builds them for political reasons like having sycophants in the west (like you) prattle about their imagined capabilities.

You don't know I suppose that a carrier can move hundreds of meters in just a few seconds which means hitting one with an ICBM is no mean feat.

 

Еxactly, there is only a 50 km wide channel between the US and Russia.

 

So you suggest me to look at some pictures of the surrender in Kiev to evaluate the numbers? Very bright idea!

 

Bottom line right there, brother.

 

Russia's road and rail network gets worse and worse and worse the further east you go. Russia's navy is crap and as we have seen in Ukraine its airforce isn't very competent either. The fact is Russia cannot even hold the occupied parts of Ukraine and it would get absolutely crushed by a real power.

It's only option would be to go nuclear as it would badly, badly lose a conventional war against a modern first wod military. Bit wouldn't even be close.

 

We do not talk about Russia. We talk about China. It can quickly buid all the infrastructure needed for an invasion.

 

Yes, as in computer game, very simple. They will also build roads and rail on Alaska side before invasion for a million solders?

 

Yes, they will. There are already huge number of Chinese in the US who can do that.

 

Aa, so in order of China government, Chinese from somewhere in California will go to taiga or forest in Alaska and start to build roads for Chinese invasion, right?

 

Alaska is not a Moon, so one can not exclude that.

 

Yes, we can't exclude that some day you will have a third leg, but it's highly
unlikely.

 

Well...that's your call weeska....I've had first person accounts of it....how you choose to assess it is your affair.