Comer et al. are Putin Pawns.

Doesn't matter, fooled no more, he's indicted for lying.

That just undermined the Comer's case,. it's down the toilet.

Sorry,. you lose

 

I could find no evidence Smirnoff was being paid.

Prove it.

If anything, he was being paid by Putin, no doubt.

 

What are you talking about? The senate bill had big bucks for Ukraine, but the House didn't let it go to the floor for a vote.

If Ukraine falls, that's on Republicans in the house. Repubs in the senate voted for it.

 

You lose

 

Putin prefers Biden.

 

Now you're just regurgitating your own false propaganda because I provided you with Wrays own testimony and YOU KNOW what he stated about Smirnov.

Another ‘trusted’ FBI informant discredited, renewing concerns over bureau’s vetting
https://justthenews.com/accountabil...-fbi-informant-discredited-renewing-red-flags
After all, just a few short months earlier, FBI Director Christopher Wray had vouched for the source, Alexander Smirnov, telling lawmakers his name shouldn’t be disclosed because he had been “invaluable” to law enforcement and was so “trusted and credible” the U.S. government had paid him hundreds of thousands of dollars for his information.

Then you knowingly create a thread on information you knew was false.

Before the committee knew anything about Smirnov, Wray (Testified under oath) he was a trusted and credible source paid hundreds of thousands of dollars over 14 years.
As soon as the committee subpoenas the 1024 on Smirnov, and get Smirnovs information, the FBI decides to charge him with lying.

So it magically took from 2020 (When Smirnov made gave his testimony of Biden) to 2024 to charge Smirnov with lying on this 1024, and it just so happened right after the committee gets his 1024 and makes it public?

The left is the most gullible and best trained media regurgitators the world has ever seen.

 

Amazing how they’re always involved with the dirt and lies about trump opponents. Crazy coincidence I’m sure,

 

If you care so passionately about Ukraine falling, you are free to strap on a rifle and go fight for them. You can prove to all of us how virtuous you are and how much more you care about a country that most of us can't find on a map.

Ukraine is going to lose, there is no other outcome available. No amount of American weapons was ever going to change that. If they had negotiated at the beginning of the war, they would have gotten much better terms than they can get now. Each year claims more Ukrainian lives and weakens their bargaining position. This is blatantly obvious to any rational person paying even a modicum of attention to the details on the ground. I blame America for scuttling a peace deal at the beginning of this war and for prolonging the war. I would like to see no money going to Ukraine, not a single dime. I applaud the Republicans in the house for not voting for it. They are correctly implementing the will of people like me who voted them into office. Shame on the Republicans in the Senate for voting for it, absolutely reprehensible.

 

DOJ suddenly doesn't believe what the FBI's longtime paid informant Smirnov (name hidden until now) said about the Bidens illicit ties to corrupt Burisma...
but
they do believe what he said about supposedly having Russian intelligence contacts? And then Wray and Brady lied to Congress saying how this no name informant is so valuable, reliable, trusted after 15 years...It's all so politically convenient, isn't it?

Can you explain why this FBI informant was paid using tax payer money to break the law?

 

Sorry, but you lose.

 

LOL! Great video.

BTW: Is Hannity trying to become more and more of a Trump lookalike by overusing the orange spray tan?

 

They were safe when Trump was president. Once people here voted for Joe, putin invaded and Ukrainians died. Its too bad people picked joe over Ukrainian lives.

 

Trump kept Ukraine safe. When Joe became president, putin decided to invade and Ukrainians are dying. Why did Joe not do what Trump was able to do, and protect ukraine from a russian invasion?

Why didnt joe protect Israel like Trump did?

A vote for joe had seriously deadly consequences.

 

You lose... You keep misrepresenting this CHS as Comer's when it has been the FBI's CHS
Comer has uncovered a boat load that never touches the FBI's Russian agent that was never verified he was a Russian agent by the FBI and then Wray and Brady illegally lied to Congress about his credibilty... and the very Burisma executive that the FBI's own FD-1023 is referring to has disappeared.
Comer never needed his testimony as he has much more for the FBI to be looking into the Biden family shady deals...
What did Joe Biden know and when did he know it?... Where are the DOJ investigations? Democrats are making claims they can't back up.
Why are the Democrats so scared of an inquiry into Joe Biden and his family's corruption to get to this evidence they seek? The House will follow the facts to where they lead... This committee is trying to get to the truth about what the president knew and when he knew it about shady deals his family was participating in and whether our National Security was put at risk.

All here…. Prove Comer wrong….
Here is four pages worth of evidence of corruption... What did Joe know and when did he know it... PROVE ANY OF IT WRONG...
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Bank-Memorandum-5.10.23.pdf
https://oversight.house.gov/release...the-bidens-from-russia-kazakhstan-and-ukraine /
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Fourth-Bank-Records-Memo.pdf
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Redacted-doc.pdf
https://oversight.house.gov/landing/biden-family-investigation/

boat load of stuff categorized...
Key Evidence:

An interactive timeline of the Biden’s pay for play schemes
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

Oversight Committee report revealing the Bidens’ dealings with foreign countries.
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-cont...promised-The-Biden-Family-Investigation-1.pdf

Biden Bank Records Memorandum showing the family created over 20 shell companies
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Bank-Memorandum-5.10.23.pdf

Key Findings from the IRS Whistleblowers
https://waysandmeans.house.gov/wp-c...ans-Fact-Sheet-on-Whistleblower-Testimony.pdf

Whistleblowers’ transcripts press release and links
https://waysandmeans.house.gov/smit...atment-for-wealthy-and-politically-connected/

Follow-up letters seeking more transcribed interviews in the wake of the IRS whistleblowers’ explosive testimony
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-jordan-smith-seek-over-a-dozen-transcribed-interviews-related-to-agency-misconduct-in-hunter-biden-investigation/

FBI Form 1023 alleging then-Vice President Joe Biden engaged in a bribery and extortion scheme and ultimately received $5 million from a Burisma executive.
https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1682067528242151427

Comer Releases Third Bank Memo Detailing Payments to the Bidens from Russia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Third-Bank-Records-Memorandum_Redacted.pdf

Sixteen Times Joe Biden Lied About His Family’s Business Schemes
https://oversight.house.gov/blog/jo...-15-times-about-his-familys-business-schemes/

Twenty-Two Examples of Joe Biden’s Involvement in His Family’s Influence Peddling Schemes
https://oversight.house.gov/blog/ev...nt-in-his-familys-influence-peddling-schemes/

Comer Reveals $200,000 Payment to Joe Biden the Same Day James Biden Received $200,000 from Americore
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-releases-evidence-of-direct-payment-to-joe-biden/

Comer Reveals How Joe Biden Received Laundered China Money
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-how-joe-biden-received-laundered-china-money/

 

The magistrate presiding over Smirnov’s case has ordered him *released* over the government’s objections. Prosecutors are seeking an emergency appeal.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GG0jYkTXAAAtZL2?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

Pretty much clears it up.. Alexander Smirnov

https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1760676327466963431

 

So, tell us. How did you KNOW with such certainty that Putin would have invaded if Biden won and how you KNOW he would not if Trump won. How? Feelings? Tea leaves?

 

FBI doesn't make policy, so their confidence or lack thereof has nothing to do with the impeachment, only Congress makes policy and they are the only relevant agent since we are talking about the validity of the impeachment effort and claims against Joe Biden and his son, and they were using Smirnoff as a centerpiece for the impeachment claims and claims against Joe being part of a non existent bribery scheme. .

You lose, and here is proof:

 

DEFLECTION
Unfortunately for you and your continuing deflections, (because you don't have anything else) I never made ANY claim about the FBI making policy, and neither did anyone else.

I provided the TESTIMONY UNDER OATH of FBI Director Christopher Wray who vouched for Alexander Smirnov, telling lawmakers his name shouldn’t be disclosed because he had been “invaluable” to law enforcement and was so “trusted and credible” the U.S. government had paid him hundreds of thousands of dollars for his information.

But it does show your desperation because you can't dispute Wrays testimony.

 

You still haven't explained how encouraging NATO to increase defense spending comprising being a Putin pawn. Seems like Biden's initial "it's only a minor incursion" would be more pawn-like.

 

Because Trump was in power 4 years, nothing. Biden wins, Putin invades. It's pretty simple, votes for Biden have caused Ukrainian lives.

 

Specious logic. You can't base foreign policy and it's complex dynamics of strategic interests for America and her allies on personal anecdote.

Horse manure.

For your edification:

The United States Department of State recognizes the critical value of preserving Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders, including Crimea and extending to its territorial waters, in the face of ongoing Russian aggression. This commitment is unwavering and underscores the importance of Ukraine as a key regional strategic partner. The U.S.-Ukraine relationship serves as a cornerstone for security, democracy, and human rights in Ukraine and the broader region.

https://www.state.gov/u-s-ukraine-charter-on-strategic-partnership/
https://www.state.gov/united-with-ukraine/

Foreign Policy Advisors (POLADs) play an integral role in building and maintaining these relationships. They bridge the gap between diplomacy and defense, ensuring that foreign policy is integrated into defense policy planning. During Russia’s threat to Ukraine and Europe, POLADs worked closely with U.S. Embassies and experts to facilitate security partnerships and negotiations, which allowed for the rapid deployment of U.S. military forces to Poland and the rallying of NATO Allies to deter further Russian aggression. Their highly networked institutions were instrumental in achieving this strategic response.

https://www.state.gov/dipnote-u-s-d...reign-policy-advisors-for-their-work-in-2022/

Furthermore, the U.S. Department of State has notified Congress of its intent to make additional long-term investments with Foreign Military Financing (FMF) to bolster Ukraine’s security and that of 13 regional partners and allies in Europe who are at risk from potential future Russian aggression.

https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-ukraine/

This commitment reflects the recognition of Ukraine’s strategic value and the need to support its sovereignty against external threats.

The point being, those qualified and in the know vehemently disagree with you. I sure as hell am not taking your word for it, so if you have a compelling argument to make, then make it, because what you've provided thus far suffers in scholarship, which the subject clearly demands.

Republicans in the house are pawns for Putin. At least the Senate is wise. Heck, even that extreme conservative Mark Levin understands the value of Ukraine in the scheme of things, not to mention the National Review. The strategic value in preserving the sovereignty of Ukraine is immense, and the cost of doing it is negligible, some 5.6% of our military budget to accomplish it. To not do so is a strategic error and you have been misled.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/aid-to-ukraine-is-a-fraction-of-the-u-s-defense-budget/

 

Congratulations, you didn't answer the question. I'm shocked.

 

You seem to not understand the difference between not answering a question, and not getting an answer you like. I'm shocked.