People such as those who claim to 'lead' 'Al Qaeda' like the feeling of power and want to be martyred by the imperialists - and they've of course always done something. As to Afghanistan, it borders on Iran, which the imperialists plan to attack from both sides, pretty clearly. And if you think Iraq is a sovereign nation entitled to sell its own oil now, you have been reading American papers: that was before it was attacked. It is difficult to get evidence independently of governments and those who own them, and my keyboard did of course melt!
So what evidence do you have that these "leaders" of Al Qaeda aren't? And your guesses on Afghanistan..... I am guessing you're not much on military strategy, are you. You wouldn't attack a nation the size of Iran from its least populated side when everyone would know LONG before you launched an attack what you were up to. We don't have the forces in Afghanistan necessary to invade Iran and any move to put that many people there would telegraph our intentions LONG before we ever made a move. I'm thinking your anti-American bias is getting the best of you. As for Iraq deciding who to sell its own oil to, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Iraq is now a sovreign nation and our military has no real presence there. Can you point to US oil executives holding seats in the Iraqi government? If not, then Iraq and Iraq alone gets to decide who gets the oil.
The ideas expressed in Mr. Adlers column reflect some of the extremist rhetoric that unfortunately exists even in some segments of our community that maliciously labels President Obama as an enemy of the Jewish people, said Abraham Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League. Who are these extremists Foxman is reffering to?
With both being funded by US tax dollars. Who usually does the jumpin...the doner or the recipient? In the end, it's all about the money, and nothing to do with ideologies.
You should do some reading on who has run the Pakistani ISI and what their ideology was vs. the concept of realpolitik and how/why funding went where it went. Interesting that Leon Panetta made not-so-subtle references to Pakistan just this weekend on 60 Minutes. Further confirming what I've felt for many years. Anyway, back to the Jews.
Dancing Israelis on 9/11 CONFIRMED to be Mossad Agents! forum debunkers will try to convince you this did not happen... it did.
u didnt see the local news report? with the whiteness who say them dancing? whatreallyhappened had links to the arrest reports and the local newspaper saying they were released to the FBI.. they were send back to iisrael.. i find it hard to believe you are incapable of finding that information... youre a smart person.. would you be upset if mossad was dancing at ground zero?
I wouldn't be happy about it. The only sources I have seen are 'truther' or conspiracy sites. Can you provide a source that shows evidence that: 1) There were dancers. 2) The dancers were Israeli 3) The Israeli dancers were confirmed Mossad agents. You made the claim that it happened - please support this claim.
I would prefer that you address my query first, as I asked first. It would be the polite thing to do.
So why were these Israeli citizens, at least one a Mossad agent, filming the towers before the first crash as if they knew something was about to happen? And why were they doing celebratory gestures after the towers were hit?
Working at intel is not the same as a Mossad agent just like a desk clerk at the CIA isn't a CIA agent. Funny how you have to explain the simplest things to truthers.
So why were these Israeli citizens, at least one a Mossad agent, filming the towers before the first crash as if they knew something was about to happen? And why were they doing celebratory gestures after the towers were hit?
Answering my question with a different unsourced claim is not a source for your claim that "at least one [of the celebrators was] a Mossad agent" Please source your claim.
Because your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) is an absolute lie. There is no evidence of when they started filming. The FBI never even found a video camera, and none of the still images taken have the towers before they were hit. Funny the lengths truthers will go to in order to "prove" their bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
Hey now, that's not fair. Since when have truthers tried to PROVE their bull(*)(*)(*)(*)? That's generally where they get tripped up -- the proof part.