Dancing Israelis on 9/11 CONFIRMED to be Mossad Agents!

They would be associates of the folks we know committed the attacks, if not those folks specifically.

Is there some association between dancing Israeli and them?

 

Yup, but you can't prove those people did anything while on those jets.

As you have shown with your post, it would be very easy to blame anybody for the events of 9/11.

All you know is what you have been told by the government

 

conveinient troofer cop-out....'y67+
=]'you were told by the government, so nothing you say is true'

 

Really? So you're going to ignore the flight attendants that called a company only line, talked to their supervisors and explained everything that happened? Wow. When you ignore evidence, you are extremely thorough.

No, it is only very easy to blame the people who carried it out. Truthers are the ones who pretend whomever they hate/are afraid of are to blame. Most blame the government but many blame the Jews, Illuminati, NWO etc.

No, all we know is what the evidence tells us. All you have is your paranoid delusions, a distinct lack of evidence, and a bunch of opinions you like to pretend is evidence. The difference is plain as day to everyone but truthers.

 

Yup -Lonnie Donegan cleaned up the popular version. No use my giving it - it will come out ***.

 

The organisers of much revolutionary activity - in the UK and Russia, for instance - were secret police. It does not require deep thinking to know that 'Israel' has plenty of well-trained ones from the USSR and plenty of Arabic-speakers from, e.g. Yemen. I do not for a moment say that the Twin Towers attack was zionist-organised and just wahabi-executed (it looks as if the US's other ally than Bin Laden, Saudi Arabia, probably organised it) but the 'cui bono?' argument is not ridiculous, surely?

 

I agree, fundamentally, but do wonder if the zionists mightn't have risked it, as they did during the Suez campaign, for instance. They have hands on a great many private parts, I think, and get away with a great deal of murder..

 

I'm always curious why Israel's Mossad is constantly brought up as a back channel organizer, YET the Pakistani ISI very rarely gets any attention?

They've got a lot more than "dancing agents" on their side of the ledger. Decades of involvement with AQ up to the present day and all.

I'll admit, it's something I've personally been interested in for years (as you probably know).

 

But for what gain? What is worth risking turning your single greatest ally into your greatest enemy, which, for Israel, is saying a LOT! I already stated what gain I see Israel having from 9/11. Do you see something I am missing?

Another question this brings up is if Israel is involved, why not pin 9/11 on a greater enemy to Israel than Al Qaeda? Al Qaeda spoke out against Israel, but numerous other countries / terrorist groups attack Israel on a regular basis.

I am not saying there is no way Israel is involved. Speculation and discussion is fine, but when it crosses the line into accusations, that is where people need to step up and stand up for the truth as we know it. If real evidence were to surface that Israel truly did have a hand in setting up and/or executing 9/11, I will be right there in the front demanding justice. Pretending some Israelis celebrating in poor taste are really Mossad agents and that proves 9/11 was done by the Jews is NOT real evidence. I know that isn't what you're saying. Just making a point.

 

I don't think the ISI as an organization was directly involved in any official capacity. I think a lot of the agents in the ISI are friendly to, if not directly supporting, Islamic terrorist activities and not just as it relates to 9/11. I would not be surprised if some of the agents were implicated in 9/11 along with other attacks against India, Pakistan's greatest enemy.

To your point, however, is the fact most of the people coming up with conspiracy theories are pro-Muslim which means they're not going to point out the Pakistani elephant in the room as they chase the fly Israel around trying to pin 9/11 on them. Because Jews and Muslims are like oil and water, if you can pin it on the Jews, that absolves Muslims of the blame by truther thinking.

 

Surely it is because it is fallacious.

Cui Bono only establishes a premise for a motive. It doesn't technically establish means, motive, or opportunity. More specifically, whether or not a particular suspect has the ability to commit a certain action or a motive to commit a certain action does not mean that they did commit a certain action.

Not only that, with truthers the Cui Bono argument often involves specious reasoning which leaves out very important information. Take this thread's argument as a good example. Truthers argue that Israeli have motive to enlist the U.S. into a battle against Muslim terror groups. They try to establish this motive with allusions to the common knowledge that Israel is attacked by Muslims, and America is a military super power. They then toss in little details like ex military Israeli were at the scene of the crime and conflate that to mean that Mossad was at the scene of the crime.

They fail to note or notice that military service in Israel is compulsory. Every male must serve 4 years, and every female must serve 2. Of course they were ex military. Every Israeli is. They also fail to notice that America already IS Israel's #1 ally in the struggle against terror attacks. Attacking America so that America will join the fight they are already joined is kinda like shooting your best friend in the foot so that he'll visit you in the hospital. It's something right out of a test for sociopaths. Only a sociopath could come up with such garbage logic.

It's also not the "only thing we can do" to determine who is to blame for these attacks as you claimed before. We can follow money. We can follow communication. We can follow accomplices. All of these can objectively lead us back to an originating source. We don't have to rely on speculation about who has motive because that's strictly subjective.

 

I personally believe there have been some points in history where the ISI was being directed in a manner that was most definitely pro-AQ, especially in the 90's. That might have come fractious in later years where you have groups "going off the reservation" and Musharaff attempted multiple purges of the ISI. How successful he was is something I'm not privy too obviously.

The actions over the last few years in that region, (leading up to the manner in which OBL was dispatched), seems to have given some credence to what I've believed for years with regards to potential ISI complicity in 9/11. Not saying it was policy, but there were very important members within the ISI who were pro-AQ over the years, including at least one past head of the ISI.

Anyway, back to the Jews.

 

I think the zionists believe, probably correctly, that they could shoot the President and most of the Senate and blame it on the Palestinians or the Iranians without much trouble from other American politicians. I think they are desperate to unleash nuclear war on the Middle East while they still have the advantage, and that that would be the motive.

I'm afraid that nothing whatever can be established from American prisoners because they are tortured.

 

And this is why you have to let the evidence speak for itself. Is there evidence of "zionist" involvement? No. Thus trying to pin it on Israel because they want nuclear war in your opinion isn't very valid. There are plenty of ways they can unleash nuclear war in the Middle East that don't involve big huge elaborate attacks on the US which, if uncovered, would destroy Israel.

They were tortured to obtain intelligence information, not to obtain confessions. The confessions of the likes of KSM were freely given in a court of law and not under duress. Moussaoui was not tortured and he still freely admitted Al Qaeda was behind 9/11. Osama was never tortured and freely admitted Al Qaeda was behind 9/11. Other Al Qaeda leaders have claimed responsibility for 9/11 and were never tortured. They continue to claim Al Qaeda was behind 9/11 to this day. The ONLY time Al Qaeda has denied 9/11 was when Osama was in the hands of the Taliban and the Taliban said they would turn him over to the US if they had evidence of his guilt. Since then, they have never denied 9/11.

 

Any use of torture discredits totally any evidence taken by or within reach of the torturers, in my view. Please be clear what I am saying: it is possible that the zionists - to force American co-operation in mass-murder in the Middle East - used agents to encourage simpletons to indulge in acts of terror. I don't say it is likely. I have extremely grave doubts about the existence of any very serious organisation called Al Qaeda myself - it looks too like the vast Anarchist conspiracy that was meant to exist in the late Nineteenth Century, and amounted to individual acts or those of small groups under the anarchist label. Terrorist 'groups' always claim any activity that happens to be going, I think. Just as the Twin Towers business suited the zionists, the vast 'Islamist' conspiracy suited the oil companies very well. I expect I have been too much exposed to US conspiracy theorists and our tories, but I've got to the point where I find it difficult not to disbelieve any statement from governments. I am shocked at the growing cynicism of the world!

 

But a lot of the evidence has been freely given by Al Qaeda themselves, nor does anyone involved deny their involvement. Even if you throw out any and all evidence gained from KSM you're still looking at overwhelming evidence that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11.

Fair enough. Too many people confuse possible with probable.

To what purpose? To put yourself in harms way? We know the command structure of Al Qaeda which is something you don't have with ghost organizations. All those people are purposefully being hunted. We know it. They know it. According to the Quoran, you're not a martyr if you're killed for something you lied about doing.

Could you please explain this to me? I keep hearing the oil companies profited from 9/11, but how? Afghanistan has no oil and the pipeline is still much closer to a pipe dream than something that can carry oil. Iraq is now a sovreign nation able to sell their own oil. Looking at the history of gas prices in the US, gas prices went DOWN after 9/11 and only slowly climbed after that.

I don't trust our government either. I let the evidence speak for itself good or bad.

I am shocked.... SHOCKED.... that you could type such a statement without your keyboard melting from the irony!

 

Yeah right lady, those Mossad agents were cheering because their plan WORKED! They were in on it Baby!

 

Assassinate Obama if he won’t attack Iran for Israel, Jewish monthly suggests:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...srael-jewish-monthly-suggests/article2310783/

 

Hey CH, why is it you can never respond to the BS in your claims? All you've been doing is regurgitating old news and pretending like it is fresh crap instead of old crap.

 

Uh......why do Zionists want to Murder the President? Just answer the question.

 

Everyone knows Jews can't dance.

 

OK. I answer your question and you answer all the questions posted to you. Fair enough? Betcha you run like the truther you are!

Zionists don't want to murder the president. That is an ignorant and anti-semitic charge by you that isn't even supported by the evidence you've presented. You have ONE Jew, Andrew Adler, who wrote it is an option. So do you have one Jew who thinks it is an option? Yes. Do all Zionists want to murder the president? No. That is retarded.

Now go run away from responding to all the questions addressed to you regarding your OP.

 

there is another great video out about the isreali mossad connection.Have you seen 9/11 MISSING LINKS? both your video and that video have overwhelming evidence and facts that the mossad was defenitely involved and the shills here at this site can only fling crap in defeat like the monkey trolls they are.

 

this lady is in denial mode doing this.