http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...he-felt-guilty-about-cheating-on-husband.html wife cried raped because she felt guilty about cheating.....
How is teaching women not to be a victim a "ploy" of the Left? You're guessing. This is the problem. People framing other people for crimes is nothing new. Yes they can and this is what's being ignored here. False rape allegations happen largely within certain contexts. Prostitutes, one night stands, f*** buddies, shack ups, all the immoral situations in which men have sex make them at much higher risk of a false rape allegation...and STD's, and a lot of other things. This is avoidable. I've never accepted the "there's nothing that can be done about it" argument because I've seen the nay sayers wrong time and time again. Boys can be raised to act in such a moral way as to avoid the kinds of situations that give rise to false rape allegations. I was raised that way and I didn't screw around. Boys can indeed do the right thing when they have positive adult leadership, adults that don't give up on them and assume that they're hopelessly beholden to their hormones. My point is a good one. Nobody can control national trends, but they can protect themselves. Parents set rules for children that don't make sense to children, but they're designed to keep them safe. So it goes for the rules set by our loving Creator. All I can do is protect myself and my family by following those rules. The rest is out of my control.
Oh sure, no problem. Planned Parenthood counselor withheld info on rape, police report reveals The Child Predator Undercover Investigation Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation have made a conscious decision to conceal the sexual exploitation of underage girls and protect the men who commit these crimes. And Life Dynamics has compiled an overwhelming body of statistical evidence showing that the rate at which these two organizations fail to comply with mandatory reporting laws is in excess of 90 percent. Planned Parenthood Profits From and Covers Up Sexual Exploitation of Minors! 8 Outrageous Things Planned Parenthood Was Caught Doing ABORTION CLINIC INVESTIGATIONS SEEK EVIDENCE OF CHILD ABUSE Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline seeks evidence in medical records of abortion clinics to as part of his investigation of child rape & illegal late term abortions. In Indiana, Planned Parenthood has sued to prevent Attorney General Steve Carter and his Medical Fraud Control Unit from searching the medical records of 12 & 13-year-old children that were victims child abuse. The AG is seeking evidence to prosecute sexual predators. I can provide more, if you like.
Yep! Besides RAPE could never happen to 'pure' women. Certainly not to their daughters on campus or in the military or on a date. AND, THEIR daughters don't have sex--ask SARAH PALIN!
Isn't one problem that some women won't seek assistance if they have to get the coercive use of force of the State involved.
You mean like the obamacare individual mandate, that forces all citizens, including women, to have healthcare? Now that we got obamacare, planned parenthood has no reason to exist at all, except to kill babies.
Seriously you're asking that question?? Do you change channels or just glaze over when WOMEN Senators and House members have stood in front of cameras and told THE WORLD that 1 in 5 woman is sexually assasulted in the US military and have been conducting multiple hearings going back at least 3 years on just this subject. THAT IS WHY WE NOW KNOW!! Yes, the boys are trying to shut em up (CLOSED DOOR reporting) but the facts are being outed nontheless. That's why I KNOW!
maybe women shouldnt be in the military.... I know its an obvious solution, but the government wouldnt have any of these problems, during a war in a war zone where military people die on a daily....
Possibly but I have no idea, state to state, whether they are mandated to tell if the patient does not give permission! Fear of a boyfriend, an 'aquaintance', an uncle, a FATHER, a minister, et al, I think is just as likely the reason these GIRLS ARE FEARFUL--much more so than the 'coercive use of state force' which young women don't even comprehend.
That is an interesting chart for sure. I wonder what explains the doubling of the number of rapes from the 70s to 1990. My guess would be the "prudence movement". That was when all the anti porn religious teamed up with the feminists (odd pairing) and started the war on porn. Societies with more relaxed "prostitution/porn laws" have a much lower incidence of rape. With the 1990's we have the internet becoming public domain and the anti porn folks went back into the closet.
Providing for the general welfare is specifically enumerated. - - - Updated - - - they may understand law enforcement taking away someone.
so what? If you cant afford an Obamacare Policy, the government will give you medicare. I know youve seen the person responsible for the destruction of the lie that is Planned Parenthood, but lets take a look back anyway.... [video=youtube;xlRC0nsjtKQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRC0nsjtKQ[/video] Planned Parenthood no longer has any reason to exist, except to kill babies. All womens healthcare needs will be provided for via Obamacare. There is no service Planned Parenthood provides, that obamacare doesnt, except the slaughter of the innocent. Furthermore, There better not be anymore government funding of Parenthood, because obamacare and the hyde amendment are plain and clear. Hyde Amendment From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the abortion-funding amendment. For the unrelated 1997 amendment, see Hyde Amendment (1997). In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortions with exceptions for incest and rape.[1] It is not a permanent law, rather it is a "rider" that, in various forms, has been routinely attached to annual appropriations bills since 1976. The Hyde Amendment applies only to funds allocated by the annual appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services. It primarily affects Medicaid. The original Hyde Amendment was passed on September 30, 1976 by the House of Representatives, by a 207-167 vote. It was named for its chief sponsor, Republican Congressman Henry Hyde of Illinois. The measure was a response to the 1973 Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade which legalized abortion, and represented the first major legislative success by the United States pro-choice movement. Congress subsequently altered the Hyde Amendment several times. The version in force from 1981 until 1993 prohibited the use of federal funds for abortions “except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term.”[2] On October 22, 1993, President Clinton signed into law the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1994.[3]  The Act contained a new version of the Hyde Amendment that expanded the category of abortions for which federal funds are available under Medicaid to include cases of rape and incest.[4]   PS The only reason Planned Parenthood lies about rape and incest to the police is because theyre knowingly violating the law.
LOL! ONE counselor reported on Fox news , ONE....and your other source, PRO-LIFE WITNESS...I didn't bother to read their biased crap...
So youd rather attack the sources instead of dealing with the reality of the situation? How many other sources would you like? I can add huffington post articles and new york times articles if you want.
That no has to be annunciated. Feminists see rape even where it doesn't exist. Some feminists see all men as rapists, all marriage as slavery, and all sex as rape. It's clear that Unifier was referring to this.
So you dont want sources anymore? I really dont care if you personally want to fund the slaughter of the innocent, Im more concerned with my government doing it with my tax dollars.
Answered previously, secures leftist female voting bloc towards biggovdaddy via fear and manipulation. Given the very low incidence of the underlying crime, the oft heard lie that we live in a "rape culture" where rape hysteria resonates throughout media clearly demonstrates my point. Not guessing. Start with googling "Greer legal dominance feminism" for a great introduction to the issues via well-researched law review article. No. You are the one making things up here. Do some reading on this site: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/ particularly Brian Banks's story on the front page. You won't be hearing much about any of the hundreds of archived incidents on this site in MSM. In a perfect world, people wouldn't do dumb things. Dumb things do not warrant having one's life ruined due to a culture-wide witchhunt devised purposefully by mainstream feminism and sounded out constantly via divisive, hateful and inaccurate propaganda.
Underlining above for emphasis. Not true either legally or ethically. I can't count on both hands and feet the times I've had completely consensual sex a few minutes after a woman said "no." The trick is to take them at their word in a "no big deal" nonchalant way and start to leave. Many will drag you straight to the bedroom, others will call and text after you've left, "I can't sleep, come back." One surefire way I know I'm almost certainly getting laid in the next ten minutes, and she is going to initiate it, is when a woman I haven't slept with yet says demonstratively, "I'm not going to sleep with you." For whatever unfathomable reason, IME this is the closest modern US women get to saying "I'm ready to have sex right now." The realities of male-female relationships, the fickleness and games that women and couples play, that any person with recent or even past significant dating experience understands, are far different from the rigid legalism feminists and others bullhorn at us in pursuit of political gain and fearmongering. The brits have a phrase for it "slap and tickle" that the group Squeeze made into a catchy pop tune in the 80s. That one gender should bear the entire responsibility for the vicissitudes of dating and sex, the games people play, is absurd and discriminatory.
You just defined the witchhunt and its favorite trick/toy, the "survey study" nicely. When you look at -all- those "1 in 4, 1 in 5" hystericist studies, you find the exact same biased questions, same shoddy methodologies, and the exact same misclassifications of sexual abuse... every time. Just because a woman had sex and later regretted it does not mean she was abused. Just because a woman had sex when she was drunk does not mean she was raped (if it does, she is likely a rapist herself if her partner was drinking). Many of the supposed victims went on to enter LTRs and marriages with their misclassified "rapists." Note that one question is almost universally absent from such studies, "have you ever been raped or sexuall abused?" See if you can figure out why that is, it's because 1 in 4 looks much better on a placard and sounds better through a bullhorn than 1 in 100. In fact, once scrutinized, one finds those studies classify many completely consensual sex acts as nonconsensual in the interest of distorting the actual incidence of crime. This is not only patently dishonest, but trivializes the real experiences of real rape victims. Anything for a convenient placard stat though, right. The "1 in 4, 1 in 5" stats are complete and utter propaganda, divisive, hateful and discriminatory lies towards political ends.
It has to do with the (social) Powers delegated to our federal Congress. You have to prove it doesn't provide for the general welfare. How credible can the right be if they are not fiscally responsible enough to provide for an ounce of prevention instead of merely complaining about pounds of cure.
