What's Kremlin got to do with the fact that genocide did not happen in Srebrenica? I would simply call it a military defeat. If you really want to talk about genocide then...So now you know Taxpayer what the real genocide looks like. US Genocide in Iraq Dr Ian Douglas with Abdul Ilah Albayaty and Hana Al Bayaty http://www.brusselstribunal.org/pdf/notesongenocideiniraq.pdf US Genocide in Iraq page 42
yes, obviously there was a genocide...pretending there wasn't is an affront to the facts. start a new thread if you want to blather about Iraq. your attempt at misdirection is misplaced.
There is a religious link There was a defense pack before WWI between them And than there was Tito, the communist and the USSR. duh
In 2001, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) judged that the 1995 Srebrenica massacre was genocide.[24] In the unanimous ruling "Prosecutor v. Krstić", the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), located in The Hague, reaffirmed that the Srebrenica massacre was genocide, Hence it is genocide.
The Jews were the first in the history of Nazi. This - not a call to hate Jews, God forbid. This - a statement of fact, since the Jews were really the first ones, who proclaimed God's chosen people and their ethnic exclusivity, and because they could not get along with other people. - - - Updated - - - http://www.politicalforum.com/416517-serbian-genocide-post1065183588.html#post1065183588
If genocide is killing off everybody of a certain ethnicity, and only men and boys were killed in Sebrenica and it's considered genocide, that means it was a gay community. Now I get it.
Taxpayer - I'm confused. If Serbs were committing genocide and killing off all the Muslims, and yet not killing women and children, does this mean that all the Muslims in Bosnia were gay. I mean there couldn't have been any women and Children there...right? Or are you saying it's true only of the Muslims in Sebrenica?
Sally - you are confused. Maybe you are having trouble with the English translation. Genocide means the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. There could have been some men and women there that didn't get killed. It's still genocide, even if you don't get them all.
If we're going to recognize genocide as the deliberate killing of an ethnic or religious group, then shouldn't the following be recognized since they are much more than the 'alleged' thousands of men killed in Sebrenica, and they also include everyone of a certain ethnicity..not just the men. The Ukrainians for instance, were picking up the Polish children by the legs and banging their heads against the wall. Japan - Killed millions of Chinese civilians in WWII but not recognized as genocide by the West because of political expediency. Turkey - Killed five million Armenian, Greek and Assyrian Christian civilians but not recognized by the West as genocide because of political expediency. Ukraine - Killed over one hundred thousand Polish and Armenian civilians in Galatia & Franco Ivansk but not recognized as genocide because of political expediency. If on the other hand we're going to recognize the killing of men as being genocide rather than a massacre, then the seven hundred thousand Serbs killed by the Croatians in WWII has to also be recognized as genocide. And then there's the starvation factor. In Greece the Nazis shipped all the food to Germany, leaving one million people to starve. Shouldn't that be considered genocide. Also what about civilians killed in bombing campaigns such as the one the Saudis are conducting in Yemen, and that we conducted throughout the world...not to mention Britain, France, Israel, etc.
If people are going to use the definition of the word? Sally, you guys can recognize what you like. The Armenian Genocide and rape of Nanking ... I don't think I'd argue if you called either of those historic tragedies genocide. The ethnic cleansing at Srebrenica in 1995 was genocide. Your boss was wrong to veto it's condemnation.
Exactly! Another example of Cultural Marxism. The Serbs were trying to preserve their culture and country. Remember what Yuri Besmenov said. A country with a strong culture cannot be subverted. Serbs resisted, so they had Clinton bomb them.
There is only two problems about "Srebrenica genocide".First,we will see in 10 or 20 years what is really happened there.Its was so confusing for me.Imagine,all world see how UN peace kippers back up before serbian forces come to town.Remember , the Duch soldiers were there,and under theirs supervision all girls,woman,old people,boys etc were deported from Srebrenica.The man who stayed in town were all soldiers.Where was the Duch soldiers when serbian forces kill all this man?where was UN when that happened?Why no one say anything about that?Do you think some one is so stupid to commit mass murder knowing that all world watch this?I think not?Remember that Gen.Ratko Mladic was filmed how he enter in town and put all this man in camp, and he know that he was filmed an there is a video about that.Is he really stupid to kill all this man ,if he knows that all world will know that?Second,all this muslim soldier from Srebrenica COMMITTED GENOCIDE against serbian people in villages all around the town,some of 4000 people was tortured, raped, killed on so brutal manner.It was going on for 3 years.Srebrenica was protected town,demilitarized by the UN forces,but there was muslim army,who committed genocide.So ,it was a revenge by the serbian army.Now,it was mass murder, and it was something terrible.Im so sorry for those people.So it a whole true.
cultural Marxism is a pretend right wing bit of silliness - - - Updated - - - this is a made up pretend account.
Dark side to America. War in Yugoslavia. Page 1 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usinfo.ru%2Fjugoslavijagallery.htm Page 2 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usinfo.ru%2Fjugoslavijagallery2.htm Page 3 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usinfo.ru%2Fjugoslavijagallery3.htm Page 4 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usinfo.ru%2Fjugoslavijagallery4.htm
Russia always takes the side of the Serbs, due to some sort of historic affinity they have with them. At one point, it led to a world war. IMO the Serbs have had their world war already and should behave so others can get their turn.
WHY? Stories of bombed Yugoslavia [video=youtube_share;5oMXrIm-yMs]http://youtu.be/5oMXrIm-yMs[/video] Fifteen years after NATO's 78-day bombardment of Yugoslavia, memories of the bombing still haunt present-day Serbia. NATO killed over 2,000 people, hundreds were civilians, 88 were children. Serbs ask 'why?' above all. Why did NATO smash their cities, kill their children, bomb hospitals and schools? When the NATO bomb campaign began (on March 24th 1999) Jelena Milincic was a student at the University of Belgrade, and just 18 years old. When the first bombs shook Belgrade she cowered under a table with her mother, sister, and best friend. Remembering this 15 years later, they laugh nervously. Jelena takes Anissa Naouai on a road trip, to remember the victims, and hear the survivors of NATO's strike terror.
The people were not the specific targets (leaflet drops were carried out to urge citizens to flee the city so they would not be killed), and they were certainly not singled out for being Japanese (Any other nationality living there would also have died). They were also not POWs.
