Cultural Marxist Harvard Prof urges liberals to treat Christians like Nazis

So what is he talking about then? If he is not talking about the Marshal Plan which is how we treated the citizenry. And he is not talking about Nuremberg which is how we treated the leadership. What is the talking about?

You do realize you have dug yourself into a really big (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hole right now? I now I've been gone for awhile but you should know that I'm the last person you want to tangle with. I will figuratively rip the flesh from your bones. I dont play nice.

 

Actually thats not true plenty of Nazi's remained the the occupation government.

This guy is talking out of his ass. He is by no means a history expert. His claim of an easy peace with the south is laughable. The reconstruction was anything but an easy peace. Lincoln wanted an easy peace but his death prevented it.

 

Why do you cultural fascists insist on forcing your agenda and beliefs onto everyone?
You allow the media to control your life, you wet your skirts over everything they tell you to, no matter the context and you think your brand of fascism is the way to go, why?

 

Sorry for the long post. It is a complicated subject. The key here is how Cultural Marxism (and similar ideologies) manifest themselves on society. What is the root ideology and why do people buy into these arguments.

The answer is 1) because to the raging masses, these arguments often sound good and
2) because we do not educate our children in the basic principles on which this nation was founded and the basics of Philosophy ( logic, logical fallacy, what constitutes a valid argument)

Utilitarianism is Communism - "what is best for the collective" It is not so much about Utopian thinking as is about laws being made on the basis of bad arguments.

"what is best for the collective" as an argument for law completely rejects individual rights and freedoms.

It is not just Blue that has ingested this ideology. Red has as well. "We the People" are getting Tag Teamed.

 

It all relates to the Frankfort School which is explained in an overview here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM

 

The Frankfurt School, Cultural Marxism, Critical Theory, Queer Theory etc isn't only the study of culture but has as its goal the shaping of culture.

"I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution to the cultural contradictions of the epoch."
"Such a worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries."
Georg Lukacs

 

Liberal/socialist Democrats or cultural fascists are 100% about violence, about taking control of govt to use the violent methods that only govt can use. The triumvirate: Hitler, Stalin, and Mao are the best example.

 

Sure you do.

- - - Updated - - -

Ohhhhhh i am sure he's so scared!

You take yourself way too seriously.

 

Another reason Hillary and Bernie should be rejected. Leftists are dangerous.

 

Only if one is dumb enough to take it literally.

 

It was an online post, not a classroom lecture.

 

this is true!! it is not coincidence that our liberals spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb, that Obama had 3 communist parents and voted to left of Sanders in Senate, or that Sanders honeymooned in the USSR.

 

So much hatred on the left.

 

One of the biggest lies the Left tells is that Hitler was on the "right". He most certainly was not. It's the organized Left that has always been bigoted and fascist and communist and anything but tolerant and "liberal" even to the point of co-opting "good" and "freedom" sounding names like "liberal", "tolerant", "progressive" and (I love this one) "for the children". Lying. Cheating elections. Throwing the race card. One thing you can always count on from the Left: whatever low down dirty deeds and tactics they're accusing the right of, they (the Left) are already doing.

 

yes, Hitler was a national socialist!! But to modern liberals he was not a socialist, but Stalin was. Go figure. It often feels like this is 1930's Germany in the sense that the liberal people are so gullible they will believe anything even the absurd lies of liberal socialists.

 

Im sure he never includes his line of thought into the classroom.

 

It was a joke.

I'm more David Cassidy 1973

- - - Updated - - -

Right

I'm sure in his classroom the first thing he does is lead the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

Are you really this dense?

I question your intellect... What do you think that means?

What if I said: “Trying to be nice to the PROGRESSIVES didn’t work well after the Civil War, nor after Brown,” he notes, whereas “taking a hard line seemed to work reasonably well in Germany and Japan after 1945.”

Oh and if it (*)(*)(*)(*)ing matters - the PROGRESSIVES in 1945 were (*)(*)(*)(*)ing Fabian Socialist Nazi sympathizers so I find this dudes position a bit ironic.

 

That's OK, I've been questioning yours for quite some time now.

Just keep repeating to yourself: "War-crimes trials and hangings."

It will be over faster that way.


.

 

Wow, such whit...

War crimes? what, are you justifying his agenda?

Dude implied it's time for a revolution against Christians and they should be treated as Nazi's or the Japanese circa 1945...

You damn well know what he meant...

 

LOL! Newp. You, in a fit of impotent rage, inferred that.

BIG difference.

 

Of course I inferred because I have gray matter between my ears and damn well know what his implications were.......

If he could have gotten away with it he would have been more blunt but it wouldn't allow his minions like you to defend him.

I mean it's not like the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing idiot was even being "vague".....

 

Thanks for admitting you lied when you claim he implied it.

I'm not defending him, m'am.

He's certainly got you confused and awfully frothy.

 

I didn't lie...... Do you know what "inferred" means?

You know what?

You can go jump off a bridge because I have zero desire to play your progressive games....... Instead of discussing this disgusting progressive fascists nonsense you're sitting here like every progressive does playing denial... I'm not going to argue with you - you damn well know what he meant but DONT (*)(*)(*)(*)ING CARE, so I'm not going to waste my time on you and your ignorance and lack of comprehension.....

 

I'm guessing Sundance is bursting with pride over the popularity of this thread, as he should. He managed to find an exquisite RW lunatic choir to sing along with him in perfect harmony.

Personally, I adore this thread, as it neatly encapsulates, in 33 wonderful pages, everything I love about right wingers: Their absolute fear and hatred of the truth. Their disregard for cold, hard facts and their burning desire to substitute them with some twisted...and in this instance, patently insane...hidden meaning. Their fanatical persecution complex. Their extremely bad spelling. Their frothy excitement at the imagined "gotcha" (although this quality is shared by the left as well).

And that's not even touching on their political and social POVs.

But my absolute favorite thing about this thread is that whereas Tushnet's blog post clearly referred to conservatives as "the losers" in the culture wars, it has now been supplanted with the all-powerful "Christians." Look, I'm a reasonable person...I can even see how the guy may very well be talking about so-called Christian conservatives as well others on the extreme right. But is anyone actually going to argue that the two words are now interchangeable? (In other words: You're all Christians on that side, huh?)

Moreover, Tushnet wrote: "For liberals, the question now is how to deal with the losers in the culture wars. That’s mostly a question of tactics. My own judgment is that taking a hard line (“You lost, live with it&#8221 is better than trying to accommodate the losers, who – remember – defended, and are defending, positions that liberals regard as having no normative pull at all. Trying to be nice to the losers didn’t work well after the Civil War, nor after Brown. (And taking a hard line seemed to work reasonably well in Germany and Japan after 1945.)"

This is where things get tricky, so try stay with me, OK?

Here is where the lot of you see him saying "treating Christians like Nazis." Is everyone agreed? Good. And that...according to the lunatic RW chorus...means a "call for a revolution on Christians," tribunals, and even executions. (LOL! ...er, sorry)

Now, most sane people would look at Tushnet's parenthetical (anyone require a definition?) statement as saying that extreme right wingers cannot be reasoned with or appeased. Up until I started posting in this thread, I probably wouldn't have agreed with that viewpoint, but indeed, you have all proven him to be spot on: Your kind really can't be reasoned with.

What's really creepy, though, is that everyone except me seemed to get the subtext here. And that is: "He's a piece of liberal scum and we think he should be fired from his job for saying all those things (even if he never said any of the things we claim he did)."

LOL! And on that note, I'm out of this thread.

(Oh, and it's "wit," by the way.)

Enjoy the loony bin fellas!


.