‘Grossly predatory’: Sex professor points ‘MeToo’ finger at God over Virgin Mary

cause if he did it, he is not good.. common sense

 

Why is he "not good?"

"Common sense" is not an answer.

 

Did she ever file rape charges?

This thread is absurd, even for the demented left.

 

This is silly. One person's opinion. Don't make so much of it.

 

Apparently ignorance is bliss....

 

she would of been punished if she had, remember the old biblical laws

she could of been stoned or even forced to marry her rapists back then

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy 22:28-29&version=NIV

 

sorry, a Jealous God that gets children Pregnant would not be a good God, i thought most people knew that

 

Yes, I remember. The laws the Muslims still live by.

 

agree, many still live by the Jewish God's old rules... wan't a nice guy back then was God? if one wants to see what life was like in biblical times, the middle east is a good place to look (it's where these 3 Abrahamic religions were created)

remember, we are talking about a God that would want to kill a man for picking up sticks on Sunday

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+15:32-35&version=KJV

 

I read she was 14, but I guess there’s not much of a difference.

 

All things evolve, except Islam.

 

there is good and bad Muslims just as there is good and bad Christians..

right now, Muslim's fanatics are king of that hill though, will Christians take it again, who knows - when economic times are hardest is when we see these bad ways of people saying God is upset with us and we need to kill the infidels

ask the Jews how Christians in Germany treated them or ask the American Indians how Christians treated them or black slaves... the list goes on

as a child molested by a Christian Preacher whom the church covered up and attacked the victim for years

yes, sadly bad theists and atheists existed in the past and will into the future as well

 

And if you want talking snakes and sex with donkeys, find a Bible.

 

Wrong. We simply haven't lost the ability to think critically, as a theist must do in order to swallow the myth.

 

so true, why would someone want to believe their God got a child pregnant? let alone put it in their religious texts

 

Sorry, your wild juxtapositioning of our modern notions of marriage with those of 2000 years ago is totally invalid.

Your "good" is not the good of those times, nor should the comparison even be considered.

 

Islam is evolving.

Islam is people and people always evolve.

Remember, Islam is 600 or so years behind Christianity.........(and Christianity may be more evolved, but still has some serious problems).

 

Christians kill christians, muslims kill muslims, buddhist kill buddhist and we all kill each other. Religion is just an excuse. We'd still be killing each other if there was only one or none at all...

 

sadly, I do not disagree with you, I think us humans would of found an excuse regardless

 

if your trying to say the creators of the religion would do it differently if they were creating it today.... I agree

 

The funny part about this is that last week he was claiming God didn't exist.

 

No, I'm saying very simply that you can't judge First Century people by your 21st Century standards.

Things were different then. The things you seem to consider "bad" were good in those times.

 

And Santa Clause is guilty of countless home invasions.

 

If morals have changed so considerably in 2000 years, why should we continue to put stock in the book that, literally, describes those morals from two millennia ago?

Talk about cognitive dissonance....

 

We shouldn't.