101 Reasons Why You NEED an Assault Weapon

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by trucker, Dec 17, 2012.

  1. pimptight

    pimptight Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,513
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We have a corporatist in office, not a communist. Quit drinking the kool-aid!
     
  2. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. SkullKrusher

    SkullKrusher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,032
    Likes Received:
    2,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No. 1 reason why anyone needs high capacity, semi auto, military style assault rifle is:

    To shoot as many people as possible, with a compact, portable weapon, as quickly as possible, with only a minimal skill level required, and a finger available to pull trigger, and at least one eye open to aim in the general direction of the fleeing hysterical human targets.
     
  4. pimptight

    pimptight Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,513
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you want to take my ability to form an effective militia, so that psychopath's have to practice more before they go on their rampage?
     
  5. SkullKrusher

    SkullKrusher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,032
    Likes Received:
    2,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No.

    Just stating the no.1 logical reason to need a ,high capacity military style, rapid firing, semi auto, compact, lightweight weapon which is easily operated, and does not require expert aiming skills.

    If OP was 101 reasons why you need a Sniper rifle, then I would say that no.1 reason would be to kill a few people, or just one VIP, at long range, from concealed position, with just one bullet, and be able to escape, before being detected.
     
  6. Troianii

    Troianii Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    13,464
    Likes Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yeah, cuz, clearly civilians have no impact on wars. Let's just forget 1775, Whiskey Rebellion, 1812, 1831, 1860, 1914, 1939, 1950, 1965, 2001, 2003. Yeah, civilians never had an impact in a war effort.
     
  7. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just as I thought, you guys truly are this insane.
     
  8. pimptight

    pimptight Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,513
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well you are full of sh*t. The number one reason I own an assault rifle is because, my government has earned my fear of it, through its actions, and my understanding of asymmetrical warfare, and a need for volume of fire that only assault rifles can provide is my rational.
     
  9. Troianii

    Troianii Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    13,464
    Likes Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Please, excuse me for citing facts and history. At least we know now those aren't valid in discussion with you.
     
  10. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There hasn't been an open rebellion against the US Govt in 150 years. The "facts" you are giving have nothing to do with you clowns trying to take on our Govt. The only thing that would spare your lives is the Govt would not want to commit such heinous acts on it's own people and completely blow you off the map. So they probably would let you rebel and slowly wait til you guys got tired and went home.
     
  11. pimptight

    pimptight Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,513
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you know how ignorant you sound, when you infer farmers and cavemen can succeed in asymmetrical warfare against the US government, but somehow a nation of veterans, chemist's, and engineers would fail?
     
  12. SkullKrusher

    SkullKrusher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,032
    Likes Received:
    2,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, if fear of the government is your no.1 reason to have a firearm, you should consider something more potent than an assault rifle, since your governments military machine can easily terminate humans from long distance, before you would ever know you were being watched, and probably in the hours when you are sleeping.

    So my reason is still no.1 logical reason, which is the same reason for ALL the weapons ever invented by man, which is: To more easily and quickly, KILL another human, or humans, whom you have failed to live in peace with, or whom themselves, cannot abide coexistence with you either.
     
  13. SkullKrusher

    SkullKrusher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,032
    Likes Received:
    2,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, if fear of the government is your no.1 reason to have a firearm, you should consider something more potent than an assault rifle, since your governments military machine can easily terminate humans from long distance, before you would ever know you were being watched, and probably in the hours when you are sleeping.

    So my reason is still no.1 logical reason, which is the same reason for ALL the weapons ever invented by man, which is: To more easily and quickly, KILL another human, or humans, whom you have failed to live in peace with, or whom themselves, cannot abide coexistence with you either.
     
  14. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You realize how ignorant you sound? Unless half the US Military decided to join your cause, you would stand no chance. This isn't the 1800s. The US Govt wouldn't even need ground support to destroy you. The air support would more than do the job to stop any crazy nut job rebellion.
     
  15. Texsdrifter

    Texsdrifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    How would the military know who the bad guys are? You drop bombs and shoot missiles you kill innocents as well. The we could easily defeat the military crowd is misguided. So is your argument, the weapons you speak of would be useless in that kind of conflict.
     
  16. savage-republican

    savage-republican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    2,134
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So why are we still in Afghanistan? Why was Iraq so hard to win? Why hasnt Syria toppled its rebellion yet?
     
  17. politicalcenter

    politicalcenter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,120
    Likes Received:
    6,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I can think no reason to own a automatic or rapid fire weapon.

    I only own on 22 cal rifle (bolt action) with a five round clip.

    I bout 200 rounds of ammo and have 197 rounds left. I shot a sick goat twice in the head and used the other round before that just to fire the dang thing...it was new.

    Oh...I forgot...I also own a cap and ball pistol. 1853 replica Colt I think.
     
  18. Texsdrifter

    Texsdrifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    We won in Iraq? Not my idea of a win.
     
  19. pimptight

    pimptight Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,513
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And what you don't understand is that a insurrection of 3,000,000 people would mean 1% of the population was fighting. The second any US military personal was deployed to American soil against specific wordage in our constitution, that insurrection becomes 150,000,000.

    The West Point officers I served with in the military, would not follow that order to kill millions of Americans!
     
  20. pimptight

    pimptight Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,513
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    See my post above. We need to be able to fight our para-military police force, and national guard troops. The second regular army or Air Force is used against the American people, the US government signed its own death warrant!

    Officers will stop following orders, if the constitution is violated in such a clear manor!
     
  21. beenthere

    beenthere Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,552
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The problem with what they are showing is they are using a .223 as their flag ship weapon when the majority of what they want to class as an " Assult" weapon takes a 7.62 X 39 cartridge. Where the .223 is nothing more than a glorified .22 the 7.62 X 39 is a .30 caliber, the same as a 30-30, .308, or 30-06. True, a 7.62 X 39 only leaves the end of the barrel at 2,425 feet per second where a .308 leaves at a littl over 2,600 feet per second but then a 30-30 only leaves at 2,200 feet per second. So, sit there and tell me that an SKS, Mac-90, or AK-47 isn't good for hunting. And, YES, they do make hunting clips for the Mac-90 and AK-47.
     
  22. beenthere

    beenthere Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,552
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The writter wouldn't want to stand in front of that paper would he??
     
  23. beenthere

    beenthere Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,552
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I would still rather have one round through the head or heart of my opponent thaqn have 20 rounds in the air
     
  24. Blackrook

    Blackrook Banned

    Joined:
    May 8, 2009
    Messages:
    13,914
    Likes Received:
    265
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Obama needs to create his armed civilian force before he can declare himself President-for-Life. He did mention he wants to do that.
     
  25. beenthere

    beenthere Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,552
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Matial Law is constitutional for small areas, not nation wide!!! Any president try that and they will find a lot of the guns and roctets of those they send out pointed right back at them
     

Share This Page