670 ballots in a precinct with 276 voters, and other tales from Georgia's primary

It was just revealed that in Los Angeles County that 112% of the eligible voters are registered to vote. It's even higher in San Diego County at 138%.

As for California as a whole, there are more people registered to vote than there are eligible voters.

But the Democrats claim that voter fraud is a myth even though voter fraud in California has been rampant for decades.

 

There are 11 counties in CA with more registered voters than eligible people 10 of the 11 voted for Hillary.

 

Despite being told of the states atrocious lack of voting machine integrity and ease of hacking and absolutely no paper back up the Secretary of State has done NOTHING to even attempt to rectify Georgia's voting procedures.

 

Chicago has gun control, the tightest in the nation, but also has the highest crime rate. ID is

Voter ID to register, and to vote again, no internet voting, you show up in person. In fact, face recognition software could be used to prove it is the same person voting as registered, or just a chop mark will do too!.

 

Proof Chicago has the highest crime rate in the nation. I bet you made that up.

 

tsk tsk tsk

What do election officials say about it?
The question revolves around the inclusion of California voters who are deemed “inactive.”

Inactive voter lists are made up of people who may have had their mail ballots or other voter documents returned as undeliverable, The Sacramento Bee explained. That can happen when someone moves or dies.

Here’s how the Bee elaborated on that:

Judicial Watch’s claim rests on its inclusion of “inactive voters” – people who have been removed from active rolls after a mail ballot, voter guide or other official document was returned as undeliverable – usually as a result of moving. They aren’t reflected in turnout tallies or signature-gathering requirements, don’t receive election materials, and are ignored by campaigns.

Los Angeles County’s registrar of voters, Dean Logan, explained to the Bee that the names on the inactive voter list are kept as a “fail-safe” so as to not disenfranchise or discourage voters.

Combining “inactive voter” and “active voter” lists could result in a higher total number of registered voters that Judicial Watch says raises suspicions.

 

Progs seem double minded here.

We do not need Congress running elections

The headline over a story at Yahoo News by Alexander Nazaryan, "White House blocks bill that would protect elections."

Hold on. Democrats-with-bylines did not believe in voter fraud. Alexander Nazaryan filed on July 5, 2017, "Trump's Election Boogeyman Wants to Make It Hard to Vote for Everyone but Republicans."

In 2017 Alexander Nazaryan told us, "There is no evidence that the nation’s electoral process, which is administered by states, lacks integrity."

In 2018 Alexander Nazaryan reported, "The Trump administration has been unable to settle on how elections should be secured, and whom they should be secured against."

So, despite no evidence that the electoral process lacks integrity, President Trump isn't securing the electoral process.

In Democratland, there is no voter fraud except by Russian bogeymen.

In 2018 Alexander Nazaryan wrote, "Despite consensus from the nation’s intelligence agencies that Russia interfered in 2016, President Trump has dismissed the threat, even as others in his administration have issued unambiguous warnings."

Hmm.

How did they reach a consensus with no evidence?

Our intelligence experts don't come off as very bright in such a scenario.

His next two sentences were "Trump has instead asserted that millions voted fraudulently in New York and California for Hillary Clinton, thus giving her an edge of some 3 million votes in the 2016 presidential race. No evidence of statistically significant voter fraud has been uncovered."

This is the Democrat Party line: Russians hacked despite no evidence, and there is no evidence of voter fraud despite numerous convictions for fraudulent voting.

In 2018 Alexander Nazaryan wrote, "The Secure Elections Act, introduced by Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., in December 2017, had co-sponsorship from two of the Senate’s most prominent liberals, Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., as well as from conservative stalwart Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and consummate centrist Susan Collins, R-Me."

This proposal is a bipartisan mess, just like the one we had following the 2000 election. Voters had failed to elect a Democrat president. Congress blamed the voting machines and ordered new ones. Now that the people have again failed to elect a Democrat president, Congress said those machines were hacked. They must have been. There is no other explanation.

So now Congress will fix the fix of a problem that did not exist.

In 2018 Alexander Nazaryan wrote, "As it currently stands, the legislation would grant every state’s top election official security clearance to receive threat information. It would also formalize the practice of information-sharing between the federal government — in particular, the Department of Homeland Security — and states regarding threats to electoral infrastructure. A technical advisory board would establish best practices related to election cybersecurity. Perhaps most significantly, the law would mandate that every state conduct a statistically significant audit following a federal election. It would also incentivize the purchase of voting machines that leave a paper record of votes cast, as opposed to some all-electronic models that do not. This would signify a marked shift away from all-electronic voting, which was encouraged with the passage of the Help Americans Vote Act in 2002."

Here's an idea: Butt out.

Let the states run the elections, and have Homeland Security do something useful, like building a wall.

To be sure, among the 50 states, there will be mistakes. But mistakes in Illinois don't affect West Virginia. Mistakes in Washington do. And they are nearly impossible to correct. I can vote out my state secretary of state if I don't like how she is doing her job.

The Federal Election Commission? We never elected them.

If Trump is blocking this legislation, good. If not, he should.

https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2018/08/we-do-not-need-congress-running.html#more