A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Wow, when I get home in the morning I'll post the link but there is a youtube video taken from the balcony of a buiding just below the twin towers that clear as day shows the 2nd plane literally entering the structure and blowing out the sides of the building.

Millions of people saw it with their own eyes, are all those millions wrong?

If the 2nd plane was fake, why are there all those videos from further away showing civlians screaming like hell when the 2nd plane slammed into the tower? If the plane was a computer generated fake, thousands of civilians standing around the WTC wouldn't have even bothered to react with screams and fear.

9/11 Truth = Traitorous Lie of America Haters and you people better hope we never meet.

 

If the 2nd plane was real then why didn't it show up in two live clips that were nicely witnessed by two spooked women? You are a traitor and a servant to ignorance. No plane was in either live footage that survived and the orb was affixed to the bottom of this fake plane.

 

Hey, you're right. This image is conclusive evidence if ever there was any.

 

Edited out maybe? Makes a hell of a lot more sense that the plane in 2 clips was edited out rather than the plane was edited in who knows HOW many clips form independent sources.

Wow, that's gotta really sting coming from a rational level headed person like you.

 

Hey, I just noticed something about those two crappy gif images. The so called "orb" is coming in at radically different angles. Why is that? Couldn't be because it's fake, could it?

 

It makes no sense and is impossible because chopper lady was watching in the air, not on TV. No plane, it's conclusive.

 

I think that third image looks like one of the people falling or jumping from the buildings, not a plane, orb or CGI image...how incompetent do you think those 'genius masterminds' you think came up with this stuff are?

 

maybe there was an inperfection in the glass of the cameras?

I just can't get past the responses, in REAL time of people on the streets...and of all the videos that show no orbs. It just seems more like a plot for there to be just TWO videos with an orb than that there would be dozens of videos that have been 'doctored' to show a plane..

and wouldnt' you think that after six years, the FBI would have faked the footage just a wee bit better??

 

and see, this is something I have never seen...has ANYONE posted videos of the different planes flying from various distances to see if they match up? that shouldn't be too hard to do I would think...

like an American Airlines jumbo jet flying at 500 miles an hour past a stationary point....let us see if they match up? or a United Airlines jet? what do the undersides look like in flight?

IS it possible to see the individual windows at that speed?

this is basic stuff I would like to see if you really want to discuss the possibility of faking the attacks..or has it already been covered?

 

you haven't proven that. it was a very confused morning...and even in the clip you posted, there was SOMETHING impacting the tower.

 

here's one...with reactions from the people on the ground..

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7U6KBtzoxp8"]WTC2 South Tower Plane Impact on 9/11 - Naudet - YouTube[/ame]

and CNN

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EU"]2nd Plane WTC - YouTube[/ame]

 

the other day, I was watching the sun set, there wasn't a plane in sight...all of a sudden in the distance I saw a plane...so it must have been a UFO since I didn't see it leave the airport and travel the entire distance? As you can see, the plane becomes clearer, the closer it gets?

seriously, you didn't think of this yourself?

 

OR that they saw a magic orb circling? wouldnt' SOMEONE in the crowd Naudet was filming cry out "What are those things circling the building!!? It's a UFO!!"...but they don't..not a one!

 

it just seem far more likely that these two women were in shock and talking because they are expected to say SOMETHING and they couldn't process what they were seeing.

 

I thought we were talking about the Second Plane? why are you diverting the thread?

 

So you're saying it's impossible to edit a plane out of a picture?

Or chopper lady is more reliable than all the people on the ground who saw a plane?

 

They didn't see a plane. Bush, in addition to wiring the WTC to explode, had men place hallucinogenic gasses in the sewer systems and all those New Yorkers were all under a giant hallucinogenic illusion generated by the US Government all so we would have an excuse to invade an insignificant country that had nothing within it that America would even remotely be interested in that we couldn't have gotten by other means.

 

That's the whole point, but it was not a Boeing 767 nor any known-to-man aircraft.

 

I'm not saying that but one women is confirming only an explosion and the other describes what might be a helicopter. That's as conclusive as you can get in this case with so much video fakery. Chopper lady is more reliable because we can hear her eyewitness account in real time as she's watching the towers before, during, and after the explosion.

 

We both know that it couldn't morph from something that looks like nothing into something that looks like a giant horsefly in eight seconds unless it was faked.

 

And what is your proof that your videos aren't faked?

And why haven't you addressed my question about the radically different angles of approach in the two "orb" gifs you posted previously?

 

yeh its called the press, who said a plane hit even though reporters who were there argued with them saying one did not.

 

and what you saw on the news was NOT faked????????????????????

​

 

I asked you first. Got a credible answer?

 

Why do you'all continue to respond to 7forever? He's here to promote his blog; nothing else.