In Article 6 from Rhodes Agreements, it states clearly that the armistic lines that been agreed upon earlier in the agreement shell not be interpreted as prujecticing to future territorial settlements or boundary lines or to claims of either Party : The Rhodes Agreements and the lines that were agreed upon there were only to delineate the lines where the armed forces stopped the war: As was mentioned in Article 4. Even Judge Steven Schwebel, former President of the International Court of Justice, stated in 1994: (among others) Source'1: http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpo.../pages/israel-jordan armistice agreement.aspx Source'2: http://jcpa.org/article/the-fallacy-of-the-“1967-borders”-–-no-such-borders-ever-existed/
right, but Egypt, Israel, and Jordan all agreed during final peace treaty talks, that the armistice lines between the three nations were to become their international borders.....except for the lines dilineating the West Bank.
So if the lines dilineating the West Bank wasnt agreed between Jordan and Israel to be their border, then the 1949 armistic lines (AKA the Green Line) cant be referred as a border of any nation.
The armistice line between Israel and Egypt, is now the official international border. ...except for the small border with Gaza. the portion of the Green line below the West Bank and north of the West Bank, is now the official international border between Israel and Jordan.
Since the border with Gaza didnt been part of the borders that Egypt and Israel agreed upon in their peace treaty, then the border with Gaza cant be referred as a border, according to the Rhodes Agreements. So according to you, the West Bank is part of the territory of Jordan? Because you stated in this comment that the Green Line is the border with Jordan.
the Green Line includes the armistice line north of the West Bank and south of the West Bank. this is now the officially recognized international border between Israel and Jordan.
You didnt answered my question, only repeated yourself. So according to you, the West Bank is part of the territory of Jordan? Because you stated in this comment that the Green Line is the border with Jordan.
I never said the West Bank is part of Jordan. I said that the Green line NORTH of the West Bank and SOUTH of the West Bank, is now recognized as the international border between Israel and Jordan. This is a fact.
So if the Green Line is not part of Jordan and thus is not the border between Israel and Jordan, then according to the Rhodes Agreements, the Green Line cant be referred as international border.
I'm sorry, but the Green line north and south of the West Bank is now an international border. how is this not clear? what am I saying that is confusing?
So according to you if the Green Line is an international border, then it means that the West Bank is part of the territory of Jordan.
And according what you said, if you stated that the Green Line is an international border between Jordan and Israel, then it means that the West Bank is part of the territory of Jordan.
I didn't say that, you KNOW I didn't say that, my statements are in CLEAR and PLAIN English, and damn easy to comprehend.
So if the Green Line wasnt agreed to be an international border between Jordan and Israel, then according to Rhodes Agreements, the Green Line cant be referred as international border.
Much of the Green Line has been agreed to as an international border between Jordan and Israel. how many times do I need to say this? i wont repeat this again. if you can't understand my clear statement, I can't help you
You stated in you last comment that you didnt say that the Green Line is the international border between Israel and Jordan, hence according to Rhodes Agreements, the Green Line cant be referred as international border.
ok, Im going to have to put you on ignore cause its now clear that you are willfully mischaracterizing my comments even though they are very clear and in plain English. I won't engage in this joke with you anymore, as you know very well what I am saying but are feigning misunderstanding, in order to troll.
You wrote in comment #93: About what I said in comment #92, which was: Are you saying know that it wasnt you that wrote comment number #93 which stated that you didnt say that the Green Line is an international border?
I am very happy that <Stuntman> is trying his utmost to educate the readers on the borders vs Armistice line. Obviously your <obdurate stance> has not gained you any kudos today!
