After AR15's are banned, then what?

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by trickyricky, Jun 21, 2016.

  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You don’t need a class 3 license.
     
  2. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And i propose that you buy anar15 in the same way
    We are all happy now
     
  3. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And i propose we make ar15 similarly available
     
  4. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, bottom lime...l treat ar15 like a machine gun and everyone is happy
    ...
     
  5. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, but lets just erase the difference between automatic and semi automatic... treat them all like automatic...Since, as so many people have assured me ARE available... so you should have no objection
     
  6. An Taibhse

    An Taibhse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    7,272
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure, and all knives should be referred to as swords, night as day, and murder as a strong disagreement. It’s consistent with the purposeful misrepresentation of words like ‘assault weapon’, and ‘Military Style’.
    I love the comedy of this forum.
     
  7. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ultimately for what legitimate purpose?
     
  8. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    In my opinion a weapon such as the AR15 type in skilled hands and use of high capacity magazines can cause nearly as much damage or suprisingly more than an automation version. The M16 and my guess the M4 has versions that you can select to fire in bursts. Firing in full auto degrades accuracy unless you are ultra good. That is why I say that a semi auto weapon in the right hands can cause more damage than a full auto taking accuracy into consideration.

    The only time a actually fire an M16 in full auto mode was at the range just before I went over to Vietnam. It was not equipped with select fire so the instructors told us to manually control our firing to bursts of three. We also were allowed to try full auto so we could learn how fast that would empty a mag. At that time us Air Force types only had 20 round mags even in Vietnam. The irony was that the two attacks that I experienced were by Katuisha rockets and 80mm mortars so I never got to fire at the enemy I could not see.

    Make my long ramblings short yes for all practical purposes a semi auto AR 15 and an automatic weapon of similar type can be considered the "same".
     
    ARDY likes this.
  9. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No thanks.
     
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope. We won’t let you do that.
     
  11. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You'll lose in court. Artificially inflating the prices of firearms to where only the wealthy can afford them would fall under the category of infringe.

    Think poll tax.
     
  12. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Yes, i also love the comedy on this forum
    Since we both love amusung diversions of this sort
    Let me share another such amusement

    Here... do an experiment
    Is you try to identify a particular type of gun called an assault weapon.... lots of people will make their business to show how you cannot identify a type of gun

    Then if you try to agree that you cannot make distinctions in types of guns (automatic and semi automatic). And therefore should treat them the same..... those same people will tell you how obvious it is that there ARE different types of guns
     
  13. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You seem to think that if a gun is hugely more expensive.... it is functionally unavailable....

    But when i argued machine guns WERE unavailable.... i was told how very wrong i was

    So.... are machine guns available..., or not?
     
  14. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am shocked, shocked
     
  15. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well said

    That said, ful auto is used in some circumstances.... as I understand it... when you want to suppress your opponent. Sometimes you just want to throw out a hail of bullets to scare the crap out of people so they keep their head down..

    .. or maybe you have a lot of people who you want to kill indiscriminately.... like in wwi..... you had a whole wave of people coming at you.... and soldiers with machine guns used full automatic fire sweeping back and forth across the battle field

    Or, if you want to commit genocide.... full auto works well.... nazis liked to line up lots of people and use full auto on them.... it seemed to be effective for the purpose
     
    PARTIZAN1 likes this.
  16. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes with concentrated targets full auto in the right hands can do a lot of damage. What I was referring to or thinking of is say a shooter such as the El Paso turd. He would and I think did more damage with a semi auto weapon than with a full auto weapon in an area where your targets can scatter and are not too concentrated. My assessment anyways.
     
  17. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Firearms are a right, the same as the right to vote, right to free speech, freedom of religion, etc. You have to stop thinking of these things are being separate or there being an artificial hierarchy of rights. They are all the same.

    Whatever proposal you come up with in regards to firearms replace the word "gun" with "vote". If it doesn't work for vote it doesn't work for gun.

    I get what you are trying to say, basically how is it then that the government can get away with charging a class 3 tax stamp for machine guns if they are a right, obviously doing such things must be legal so lets do that for AR-15s too. That is actually a separate topic and yes you will find plenty of people who do think it's actually Constitutionally illegal for the government to do that. However, the difference between guns and voting is the fact that you can't really own and possess a vote. Firearms are the only right that carries with it a physical object that one can possess.

    The AR-15 and rifles like that are the modern day common "musket" of the 18th century. Even in those days yes you could purchase cannon and even warships as a private citizen, they were just obviously expensive and the common man didn't have cannon in his yard. But he did have muskets and later on Winchester Lever Actions, etc. The "common" handheld firearms of the day. As we more forward in history technology obviously advances and the common rifle went from muskets to repeaters to semi automatic. The government can't artificially raise the price of firearms and/or tax the crap out of the firearms in order to disenfranchise the common man from being able to purchase one. That is an infringement on the rights of the common man to own a firearm.

    As cannon were expensive in the 18th and 19th centuries so too are belt fed machine guns and explosives in the modern era. The government isn't saying you can't own those, they just cost a lot. But the common firearm whether that be an 1873 Lever Action in the 19th century or an AR-15 in the 21st remains affordable for the average person to purchase. If the government tried to tax any firearms at 1000% or something in order to disenfranchise the common man then that would be illegal and would not stand up in court.

    Plus machine guns are really only expensive due to the limited number of them. It's not the tax stamp that makes them cost that much it's the fact that they're all a few decades old and there aren't nearly as many as say AR's. The government isn't mandating that they cost $15,000 or anything, the only requirement is a $200 tax. It's the FFL that is charging tens of thousands of dollars for them due to their rarity, it's supply and demand not direct government artificial inflation. The FFL can sell you a functional M60 for 100 bucks if they want to.

    Yes you can buy machine guns, yes they are expensive, no the government isn't deliberately making them expensive, supply and demand is doing that. If the government tried to mandate that any machine gun must cost at least $20,000 then that would be illegal for them to do.
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2019
  18. ARDY

    ARDY Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Yes, i agree.... with the caveat that a novice might assume they could do worse with full auto

    This entire discussion becomes (IMO) a convoluted mess
    In that mass shooting are so shocking as to raise these topics....
    But yet, by the numbers, mass shootings are not such a big problem. And, yeah, it is near impossible to define an assult weapon, And yeah, not matter how you define an assault weapon.... manufacturers will still market still find ways yo make and sell highly lethal weapons. And what ever manufacturers do...enthusiasts will find ways to procure mods like high capacity magazines, etc

    So you got a problem that isn’t exactly the problem
    And you have solutions that cannot solve the problem
    And you have lots of people and money devoted to making sure the problem will not be solved. You have people who are trying to solve the wrong problem. People who just want to do “something” even if it is an in effective solution for the wrong problem...... on and on an on
     
  19. An Taibhse

    An Taibhse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    7,272
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I do not agree that distinctions cannot be made between automatic and semi-automatic guns; that distinction is easy. Further, I can both define the criteria for, identify assault rifles/weapons and make distinction between any gun’s type of action. As for an ‘assault weapon’ a AR15 isn’t one. As for asking people to identify one, those knowledgeable of firearms can. Those that have obtained their ‘expertise’ from the mainstream media and Hollywood have no knowledge of how firearms work, but tend to identify the class of a gun by a gun’s resemblance to images of those weapons the MS media, Hollywood, and other sources of propaganda use in their depictions of those weapons they vilify with narratives constructed from myth and ignorance. Most of them have no clue of the origin of the term ‘assault rifle’ nor the criteria used for it’s definition.
    I had a discussion the other day with a fellow who declared all semi autos as evil, including semi auto pistols. You shouldn’t be able to shoot as fast as you can pull the trigger, the definition, according to him of a semi auto gun. Really, says I; does that include revolvers? Says, he...’Yes’. Those knowledgable will chuckle with that.
    Identification of a type gun requires knowledge of guns, their history of development, design lineages, and more. But, your bid for agreement...”Then if you try to agree that you cannot make distinctions in types of guns (automatic and semi automatic). And therefore should treat them the same..... those same people will tell you how obvious it is that there ARE different types of guns” is implicit that those that can’t operate from positions of ignorance and should not participate in crafting law based on that ignorance, yet your position of treating semi autos and autos is an appeal to that level of ignorance.
     
    10A likes this.
  20. An Taibhse

    An Taibhse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    7,272
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anyone can pick up a paint brush. The result will depend on skill. Someone skilled with a WWII Lee Enfield can be as effective as someone with a semi auto rifle, and depending on the task, can be more effective than someone with an M4 chambered in 5.56.
    “Sameness” of firearms can always be defined... they all toss projectiles downrange. But, different designs are better suited for some tasks than others and their effectiveness is hugely affected by skill.
     
    PARTIZAN1 likes this.
  21. An Taibhse

    An Taibhse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    7,272
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The damage done couldn’t have been done with a bolt action rifle, a Winchester lever gun, or a pump action?
     
  22. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As you yourself recently stated, yeah it could depending on the skill level of the person using the firearm. Go look up folks on youtube who can rapid fire lever action rifles with ridiculous accuracy.

    For the average person no they likely couldn't do as much damage and the same amount of time with a lever action vs a semi automatic. Thats not a good enough reason to make one illegal though. There are also people who can rapid fire semi-auto rifles about as fast as an M60 using nothing but their own fingers without any sort of bump stocks or rubber bands or anything.

    As you said, firearms are all designed for the same reason, to toss projectiles downrange. Now what one choose to toss those projectiles at is the choice of the individual, not the particular type of firearm.
     
  23. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It could come close with a very highly skilled shooter using a bolt action but older bolt action rifles did not have the large capacity magazine.
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2019
  24. Dispondent

    Dispondent Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    34,260
    Likes Received:
    8,086
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So-called madmen kill thousands of Americans a year with handguns, but even the most ardent gun grabbers balk at taking away handguns. The thing is, the AR or AK can be portrayed as 'scary' and triggered liberals will cower in fear and demand the scary guns be banned. Even though those scary guns kill very few people a year. The solution to all these problems is for gun grabbers to actually grab their sacks and realize that their fears don't trump my rights. We need fewer infringements, more freedoms...
     
  25. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    True bolt action rifles are very very difficult to rapid fire. My " Winchester " level action 22 is obviously tube fed. It takes some time to reload. I can load 16 rounds of 22 shorts but besides not having shopping power the fire fight would be long over before I reloaded. When my dad first gave that first totally my rifle he gave me a small case of 22 shorts to kill paper targets, bottles and cans. At age 16 I was The Rifleman....LOL
     

Share This Page