Al Jazeera reporter killed during Israeli raid in West Bank

And as for this case in the year 2022?

 

Clear and concise.

 

What is?

 

And that has been the same tactic ever since, except (I still believe) for Yitzhak Rabin.

 

Yes, you're right except even when the Palestines don't respond, the provocations continue.

How long would you meekly tolerate the theft of your land, destruction of your home and possessions and the relentless murder of your family members?

The simple truth is that the Israelis don't want peace because peace would mean the end of "free land" and a cessation of ethnic cleansing.

Dayan's "provoke-then-massacre" quote(*) tells us all we need to know.


(*). "Moshe Dayan, in his diaries said: "Our strategy was always to provoke the Arabs and get an appropriate response so we could attack and smash them."

http://www.sott.net/signs/signs154.htm

 

I would say that the same Western MSM pro Israeli bias remains in this most recent killing.

 

You're right.

The simple truth is that most Israelis seem to prefer the status quo as long as they can continue to steal land, destroy homes and continue their ethnic cleansing they are happy.

A fair and just peace would at least require some form of reparations like the insatiable Holocaust Industry has extracted from countless countries and industries around the world.

Frequently, Israeli media is more open and honest than US media when it comes to Middle East events.

For example:

"Israel Does Not Want Peace"
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-does-not-want-peace-1.5253291

EXCERPT "Rejectionism is embedded in Israel's most primal beliefs. There, at the deepest level, lies the concept that this land is destined for the Jews alone.

Israel does not want peace. There is nothing I have ever written that I would be happier to be proved wrong about. But the evidence is piling up. In fact, it can be said that Israel has never wanted peace – a just peace, that is, one based on a just compromise for both sides.

The single most overwhelming item of evidence of Israel’s rejection of peace is, of course, the settlements project. From the dawn of its existence, there has never been a more reliable or more precise litmus test for Israel’s true intentions than this particular enterprise. In plain words: The builders of settlements want to consolidate the occupation, and those who want to consolidate the occupation do not want peace. That’s the whole story in a nutshell." CONTINUED

 

It's your opinion that it's theft.

Oh but the Palestinians DO want peace?

 

I know it is very simple .. but for some reason you can not understand

 

Here it is:

 

The Zionists like to PR their existence as “entitled” and just as one would pamper a sickly child and spoil him, the west is at Israel’s beck & call virtually encouraging them.

 

What is the point of repeating your false assertion over and over "No Reason" "No Good Reason" -- when the reverse was stated to you . plain as day. as I said .. dyslexic reading comprehension or some such thing ... you think folks have said the opposite of what was stated to you.

 

In no way that QUESTION and assumption. You're confused.

 

You are asserting that I "assumed" the reporter was killed for no reason ... crying " So your assuming this happened for no reason"

Then when I correct your flawed assertion/assumption -- you repeat the same assertion "So your assuming there was no good reason" .. in a mind bending cycle of dyslexic delusion.

 

No, I was ASKING you if that's what you think.

 

According to what? The entire media laid the blame on Israel based on what Al Jazeera said!

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...id-in-west-bank.599594/page-5#post-1073455559

 

Well do you suppose that is because the news source that you were relying on maybe didn't have all of the facts? Also The Intercept is incredibly biased to the left and as such is biased against Israel, which is probably why you use it. So even if the journalist for The Intercept had all of the facts, it wouldn't surprised me if they left them out to fit their narrative. Anyway, see below from the Washington Post. And before you call the Washington Post biased against Israel, does that look a PRO-Israel headline to you? Israeli "police beatings?" Yes, that's SO pro-Israel! Not to mention that what I quote below is buried 6 paragraphs down!

 

Twice .. asserting the same false nonsense .. .. and Yes . if somone says to you "So you are a moron" ... they are asserting that you are a moron ..

 

No asserting. Just a question.

 

And what do you think the reason was in this case?

 

WTF?

 

Nope?
I wrote, over a 100 shot, and some killed.
You sourced 19 got killed, but don't disprove over a 100 got shot.

 

You edditted out:
Weird. They had a vote on in, and the vast majority of countries votes in favor of recognizing Palestine, and so there it is.
True story.

You are conceding to this, by not responding.



You are also conceding to:
Your idea of "joined" still contains that the Jewo fascistic government does the investigation and the Palestine -who the you and the fascists government do not recognize- only may observe in submission. So the Jewo fascists call it one thing, but it's actually something else. While you are conceding that an independent ICC investigation is much better.

And you are conceding to:
"Yes, Muslim Arabo Jihados hate Christian Arabs, they call them Infidels" is false. The president of Palestine did not say this.