Alan Dershowitz Explains Why There’s No ‘Possible Criminal Conduct’ In Trump-Ukraine Story

You've been making fun of Trump and the Conservatives for what, 3 years now? They say, laughing is good for one's health, so in another 5 years you'll be very healthy indeed

 

That it exist, not any of its content. In. Fact the transcript clearly highlights it isn’t correct

 

Well I expect Lying "Ted" Cruz to tow the line and not join any revolution.
Hey he is a "man" who grovelled at Truml's feet after Trump alluded to Lying Ted's wife being ugly.
Rubio is going to read the tea leaves before he commits eithervway. But I expect he will be staying with the party.

 

So you must be a huge supporter of impeaching Trump.

 

There was no more overrated speaker than Barack Obama. He would say something obvious and mundane -stop- survey the room to see if they caught on how deep his thought was, and then go on to other silliness.

No modern political speaker connects with the people like Donald Trump, and that would seem to be the point of any public speaker. Barack Obama was the most disappointing President in modern US history and, perhaps, the most dishonest.

 

You still on about crowd size? Do you understand the rules on impeachment and why, where and how the charges of impeachment come about?

All of those Dem candidates are lying, making promises they can't possibly fulfill, but will they be impeached? No, of course not. However lying in front of the House, like Hillary Clinton and Adam Schiff both did, is quite possibly impeachable.

 

I didn't say anything about crowd sizes. Are you feeling OK?

Yes

Neither Adam Schiff or Hillary lied in front of the House. Trump has lied thousands of times, and you said you have no use for liars. Therefore you must have no use for Trump and support impeaching him.

 

It hasn't yet.

 

Yep and you can definitely tell when Trumpy is reading off the telepromoter, because is sounds like you are at a funeral.

His deeds are the problem.

 

To the Liberals like yourself, they definitely are - you guys can't afford to have a successful Republican president. Too bad

 

The apocalypse? With your help, it may.

 

Hmmm since I am not a Liberal, you are not addressing me. I would love ANY president to be successful, unfortunately the one we have now comes with too much controversy of his own making.

 

I doubt it since I don't make policy.

 

No my friend, you wish for it and it is obvious.

 

No need to be ashamed of being Liberal. They're just as American as us, Conservatives.

 

Nope not a liberal, some of my views are liberal and some are conservatives.

 

Anyone else find this fishy?

August 2019 the CIA secretly changed the qualifications for a whistleblower.
Prior to August 2019, second hand information was not considered valid for whistleblowers.

Then in August 2019 they changed their policy and started investigating second hand information.

One month later, they have a whistleblower who has nothing but second hand information.

 

The left finally caught Trump doing something wrong....looking into corruption. MONSTER!

 

I notice you said "The majority view". where is the MINORITY VIEW?

Do you have to be a Trump frother at Harvard Law to count?

Anyway, this majority's view is unconstitutionally vague. "Intential, evil deeds" could mean anything--like beating HIllary and making fools of her, the entire democratic party, the mass media, pollsters and TRUMP FROTHERS.

Just try and get the Supreme Court to rubber stamp this "majority view".

 

True, true. We should definately start that investigation into Biden.

 

Yup, it's what banana republics do. Reminds me of the Dems nuclear option on confirming judges coming back to bite them.