AWESOME- Unborn child has inalienable RIGHT TO LIFE- AL Supreme Court

You mean those people who hate women and thus treat them like they're too immature to bear the responsilities for their own actions? You might know about the, but the Mayor doesn't vote for Rodents, so he's not a member.

[/quote]You obviously have no idea of just who gets abortions,[/quote]

FYI, they're called "women"

Forever, or the Hippocratic Oath would not contain an express prohibition against performing them.

You weren't aware of that, were you?

Science says that a zygote is a genetically unique human individual no different genetically from the mature adult it will become. In a word, real science says that life begins at conception, and no later, no earlier. YOUR "science" has to carve out special cases because you can't handle the truth.

If they're not getting themselves pregnant, you must beleive that they catch it from dirty toilets.

- - - Updated - - -

It's when the rapist's child is executed in utero without benefit of trial, habeas corpus, appeal or jury.

You know, the things you liberals demand the rapist get...even though you're against executing HIM. Just his baby.

 

I'm pretty much as pro-choice as they come and you can execute every single rapist in prison for all I care. Round up the child molesters and the violent gang members too.

Stupid attack is stupid.

 

Were you aware the original Hippocratic Oath requires allegiance to pagan gods and states that medical students must share their "substance" with their teacher and "relieve his necessities."?

There is no such consensus among scientists.

 

You're assuming that she wouldn't, or that she would immediately try to hide it...because every womans FIRST thought is abortion? No....in many cases people WOULD know. (By the way the example stated a woman who is known pregnant.)

It was another " example" , this time about miscarriages. Are you of the opinion Women don't have a doctor, or if they were experiencing a possible miscarriage....that they wouldn't go see him or her? In a legitimate miscarriage, there are medical records. These were examples.
Is that the part that you didn't get?

Oh bruises are regularly left behind when one gets kicked..punched..whatever in the belly or face. in this "example" if you had no backup to prove the miscarriage...and you had signs like that, one might suspect foul play.
All clear now?

You're fooling yourself if you assume every woman, going to do a self abort..is going to be the Rhodes scholar you are painting them out to be LOL. those "examples" above were just a couple "examples" of how one might not be able to get away with it.

Again, you either don't read too well...or you don't understand what you read. I'm not assuming your bolded at all, you would have known that had you read the entire sentence you thought you were rebuttling.

Here it is again

Hmmm, looks like I had stated it wasn't going to be 100% quite clearly...so another one of your "assumptions" batted down.

HAHAHAHAAH You took the problem as being with the ampersand??? Thanks for the laugh.

No, it was more than spelling. You had no idea what you were talking about. You still don't and think it was all about the spelling. You didn't know what the word and term were, you heard it somewhere and threw it out there Archie Bunker style.

yeah....it was the spelling Arch...

Sooner or later you're going to feel real stupid when you realize it was never your spelling that was the criticism. or maybe you'll never even put it together, either way.
LOL...remind me again what your stance is here? its all about womens health? So...you want medical personnel...to....pass on how to's to see non medical personnel? Is that what you're saying??
Womens health right?

Your rebuttals aren't even based off of the posts you were rebutting. You're entertaining though.

 

You don't seem to get it, TELLING people not to have sex or TELLING women not to have abortions is not effective. People make up their own minds. So-called teaching people not to have sex may make them feel guilty about having sex, but it won't stop them from doing it.

Maybe teaching should start with a dictionary with a bookmark at the page with the murder entry.

The facts are simple. Condoms reduce the risk of pregnancy and STDs. Comprehensive sex ed should cover the issues that concern you, but probably the reason you and your cohorts resist comprehensive sex ed is that kids will hear the truth and not your scare tactics.

The modern Hippocratic Oath says nothing about abortion, but a Hippocratic Oath is not required to be a doctor anyway. Many schools use no oath at all. If you seriously would like to have a sensible conversation about this issue, you will have to get past using the term "murder" instead of "abortion". If your goal is just to relieve tension by ranting, have at it but don't expect thoughtful reasoned replies.

NEVER!! Now man up and admit that males share an equal blame in creating unwanted pregnancies.

 

ouch...still tripping up in your zeal to post something that the little words slip by eh? That's embarrassing. Yeah..look at your bolded, and then re look at the quote you were refuting...which was this one.

Oooof. Yeah, doesn't really work does it? Take a good look at the smiley you used when you posted that, and realize it's actually you it's laughing at right now.


Lets see what else we have from the comedy vault.

Yeah...looks like you did it again.

So I said a Person, (Parent) doesn't own another persons body (Kids)

The another poster accused me of not believing a person owns their OWN body..which was false.

Then you posted a response I gave to someone about changing their mind, and are pretending this was the answer that followed the second quote.

Then in your summary question you mangle it even further by trying to move a goalpost to a woman not owning her own body after conception??

When did I ever state a Woman doesn't own her own body after conception. Please snip that one out and post it.

Man...think things through before you post. Spellcheck isn't the problem. Better see if they have a "comprehension check" and plunk down a few bucks on it.

 

Obviously not, human, a human, a human being, a person. And yes it does by all measures.

But since I have been warned for using proper definitions or words even when backing it up while the pro-abortion is free to bastardize the language, as you attempt to do here, I find further attempts to debate the issue untenable.

 

The child's right to life does not override the mother's property ownership rights to her body. Part of property ownership is the right to deny others the use of your property.

 

You mean like what you just did, calling raped women liars and saying that it wasn't really rape? What does that have to do with the alleged "innocence" of a fetus?

There is no law that says that a male gamete plus a female gamete equals innocence. That's a theoretical construct that you're free to believe in, but have no right to force upon others. The same goes for using hyperbole to label things like embryos as "babies", and pretend that they're no different than a living, breathing, sentient human. There is an obvious difference!

You know what? If your cause is so weak that you have to resort to name-calling and dares, it probably isn't worth following in the first place. IJS

 

My fingernail is human , it isn't A human...catching on ???

And why is it so hard for you to type "fetus" when referring to a "fetus"....??

 

The woman's property ownership rights to her body do not override the child's right to life.

 

Pro choicers name call pro lifers all of the time. They call them "anti woman", and "religious freaks".

 

There is no scientific consensus about the point at which a human being is created. An acorn is a member of the its genus and species, but it is not a tree.

 

So your excuse is that because you allege that other kids are doing it, that it can't be wrong? Excuses like that are a slippery slope to the depths of Hell, my friend. I think you need to find your moral compass before you start telling people what to do.

 

FYI, they're called "women"



Forever, or the Hippocratic Oath would not contain an express prohibition against performing them.

You weren't aware of that, were you?



Science says that a zygote is a genetically unique human individual no different genetically from the mature adult it will become. In a word, real science says that life begins at conception, and no later, no earlier. YOUR "science" has to carve out special cases because you can't handle the truth.



If they're not getting themselves pregnant, you must beleive that they catch it from dirty toilets.

- - - Updated - - -



It's when the rapist's child is executed in utero without benefit of trial, habeas corpus, appeal or jury.

You know, the things you liberals demand the rapist get...even though you're against executing HIM. Just his baby.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]

It's still safe and legal.. ..and from your posts it's quite clear that your "concern" is not for the fetus ......

 

Good Thread people, Feel Free to open it again cause this one is at the limit.

Closed.