AWESOME- Unborn child has inalienable RIGHT TO LIFE- AL Supreme Court

They can still come after you for monetary responsibility and make you show cause.

 

At least the Left is consistent through and through. No matter what the issue, the running theme is avoidance of responsibility for one's actions and choices.

 

Let us see what happens when or if this gets to SCOTUS .. my bet is that it will be struck down.

 

Which of course is wholly irrelevant as consent can be withdrawn at anytime for any reason. A woman has full control over anything to do with her body including anything that resides within it.

and as usual for pro-lifers they fail to understand what UVVA type laws are all about, they are in fact an extension of the woman's right to choose, when a third party kills a woman and the fetus they are removing her right to choose, they are acting without consent of the woman.

 

Please state the law that shows that not taking responsibility is illegal?

Which is wholly irrelevant to the issue of a woman's autonomy.

 

In that case then a mother should have no legal way of refusing to give blood etc to her born child, after all she helped create the child whose life depends on her and she did create the situation where that baby's life is dependent on hers.

Really, so tell me for how long does the helicopter reside inside of the person to be rescued?

- - - Updated - - -

A life only has as much 'weight' as another places upon it.

- - - Updated - - -

Agreed, though this has nothing to do with abortion .. look up murder and see what it says, perhaps you will discover that your usage of this word has no meaning in abortion.

- - - Updated - - -

Begs the question - prove there is such a thing as an inalienable right to life.

- - - Updated - - -

No she does not, unless you can show me where 'obligation' is a legal requirement.

 

Really, well that statement is a complete falsehood .. you do realize of course that abortion only covers 3% of what PP provide and please do provide you evidence that banning abortion would save even a single fetus.

or the next Hitler

 

In order to secure a conviction you have to have a chain of evidence that shows beyond reasonable doubt that a crime has been committed .. please do tell how you are going to get that chain of evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

 

Funny MOST women didn't obey the law when it was illegal. Data extrapolated from hospital records estimate that there were on average close to 829,000 illegal or self-induced abortions in 1967, and in direct comparisons to other countries, such as Brazil, where abortion is illegal show that it has little to no effect on the number of abortions that occur

 

and of course you have proof of this claim.

 

Common thread with your posts, when you can't answer you resort to attacking the poster ..

 

Just how will they suspect a murder

There is no medical way to tell the difference between an abortion and a miscarriage with a therapeutically D&C afterwards.

From the person who doesn't even know that there is no medical way to tell the difference between an abortion and a miscarriage followed by a therapeutically D&C

 

Utterly and totally wrong

So she doesn't own it after conception .. then who does?

- - - Updated - - -

Question - Would you agree that a person can defend themselves against unconsented attacks?

 

Voluntary collectivization works all over the world every single day. Never heard of a commune? Never heard of a worker-owned business?

 

Happens all the time

 

For someone who claims to be a supporter of rights and opposed to government control, you certainly are an advocate for the government restricting people's rights and freedoms.

 

what an absurd comment, rights are based on morality nature has no morality.

 

abortion restricts the baby's rights and freedoms.

 

Does one person's right to life grant them the power to deny another person's right of ownership of their bodies?

 

In certain situations, I would argue yes.

 

Interesting. So slavery (the ownership of one person by another) is allowable in certain situations. Where is the Constitutional allowance for this?

 

Slave owners aren't innocent. Fetuses are. The fetus is innocent, just like the slave is.

 

Wondered how long it would be before someone invoked Godwin's law .. I love it when pro-lifers try to use Nazi Germany as a comparison to abortion, they always miss that bloody big elephant in the room ..

 

Actually if you have even the slightest understanding of the subject matter (biology) then you would know that there is not a human (noun) being at conception .. pro-lifers often fall into interchanging human(adj) with human (noun)

 

Urm yes she can if that person does not cease and desist.