As a conservative, I have no problem with what Baldwin said. He asked the people to vote to change the course of the future. That is the case for every election, plain and simple.
What was obvious is that Baldwin was echoing the same type of rhetoric the Demos have been putting out there. Using innuendo with violence. Most know you don't overthrow somebody by being Formal and Lawful. Even the lowliest drones of the collective should be getting that. If not there is a short circuit with the wiring and that drone should be taken in for repairs.
"o·ver·throw verb verb: overthrow; 3rd person present: overthrows; past tense: overthrew; gerund or present participle: overthrowing; past participle: overthrown ˌōvərˈTHrō/ 1. remove forcibly from power. "military coups which had attempted to overthrow the king" synonyms: remove (from office/power), bring down, topple, depose, oust, displace, unseat, dethrone" It's pretty clear he said "overthrow". He never said "vote". [
Baldwin then encouraged the crowd to vote next month in the midterm elections given its significance. “This election and the one that follows in 2020 will be the most consequential elections since the election of FDR,” he said, adding, “it is time to overthrow the government of Donald Trump -- not in a violent way or unlawful way -- but it must be overthrown nonetheless.”...snip~ This election and the one that follows.....it is time to overthrow the government of Donald Trump. They must have been planning to fail the first time.....this election, huh?
No, he wasn't....you act like Baldwin said "...knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously, OK? Just knock the hell ... I promise you I will pay for the legal fees. I promise, I promise," Or...."I love the old days. You know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They'd be carried out on a stretcher, folks," I mean, come on...what person would say such a violence inciting thing like that?
There were no violent radical leftists idiot -- Trump said that about a guy who was sucker punched by racist old coward -- punched a man who did NOTHING to him or anyone else... But idiots like you like praising coward ass **** -- that is why I have zero sympathy for whatever karma comes your way
I'm not acting like anything. I simply commenting on the word Baldwin chose to use. Just as you are commenting on the words used by Candidate Trump.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-supporters-attacks-violence-hatred-media-bias/ https://www.pbs.org/newshour/features/trump-supporters-portland/ https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/25/liberals-attack-bondi-sanders-trump-667934
Alec Baldwin is too stupid to understand the difference between winning elections and overthrowing the government. He is a typical Hollywood, know nothing jack wagon who stuffs his feet into his incredibly large mouth every time he speaks. What Baldwin really wants is socialism for everyone but him. He loves his elite lifestyle.
Baldwin should stop. I've already posted the definition of "overthrow". Baldwin knew exactly what he was saying. Or are you suggesting he is too stupid to understand that. If so, you might have a point.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/ratings-abc-alec-baldwin-show-161117676.html Alec Baldwin show absolutely bombs! ABC cans Roseanne Barr for her political stance (killing a ratings winner) but will lose millions putting this tedious, angry gasbag on tv giving his leftist political rants a platform. ABC demonstrates to shareholders and viewers that indoctrination is their primary goal. Shitcan ABC.
No. I'm suggesting you and the other rightists here are sensationalizing this for political purposes. Its absurd and childish and it's something you lot bitch about the media and the left doibug to trump incessantly. insane.
Perhaps you could get your friends on the left to stop sending out such violent messaging. Personally, I can't grasp why they think that is going to attract anyone outside the group they already have. That is what is insane.
Yes, it is a good system.. Otherwise, candidates would focus on huge states and ignore the smaller states. This gives the "little guy" a voice, but libs hate when the "little guy' gets a voice.
It's interesting to read the rants coming from those who embrace the tyranny of the majority, while claiming they are a party were everyone should have a voice.....