I really love this thread because the beta males come in confirming everything SpaceCricket79 says about beta males.
IMO most women like to see men performing physical actions that they (men) are not only passionate about but are obviously good at even though those same women think such actions might be 'too dangerous.' The level of 'danger' that is titillating to women is important and may vary from woman to woman. The mistake beta males make is to try to cater to such female hand wringing. If a man is passionate about what he does, the right woman will come. Hint to women: SEX is a huge influence on what real men think and do. This does not mean that men cannot think and do other things. A REAL man has conquered this overwhelming hormonal energy and has the ability to channel it to perform other actions he is passionate about. A REAL man's sexual performance is also enhanced by this passion. A beta-male will blunt his own passions and aspirations and pretend he is whatever he thinks the woman (he has targeted) wants to see and/or hear in order to obtain SEX.
Women like to see men performing tasks they are good at because that is a sign of confidence. Confidence is knowing that you are competent. Cockey is thinking that you are competent when you are actually incompetent. Ability to perform competently seperates the confident from the cockey.
Exactly, good point. A truly passionate, competent man will attract passionate, competent women as well. Narcissistic, whiny women will be attracted to sniveling beta males.
The last one is unfair, many Christian males are not this 'beta' and they use that line because its a sin to fornicate.
You misunderstood the point of the OP. Though being sexually repressed isn't exactly "alpha" regardless for religion, just sayin'
Sexual repression is not a sign of beta maleness, it's a sign of moral fortitude to save ones self for marriage. It's easier to have relations, and harder not to, so resisting the temptations of fornication is a good sign of inner strength.
I didn't say it was - "beta maleness" is a personality trait - I simply said 'sexual repression' isn't a good sign of mental health, and it's not. In fact there've been many studies showing a link between mental illness and personality disorders, and coming from an overly-sexually repressed backgroun. Except that isn't a true 'moral' issue, in a typical sense of right/wrong - it's more akin to how some vegans view eating meat as a moral issue. And while some people may legitimately feel it's a moral issue (though I'd think that's a bit extreme, to feel 'morally guilty' for eating meat, or having a relationship - as they're natural human functions which don't harm other people directly) - with others' it's not a true moral issue - they just put on a guise of 'having a moral issue', when it's really just a cop out - think "sour grapes". Ex. Some people who are lazy and unmotivated to improve themselves financially will come up with some claim like "I don't need a lot of money to be happy" - but that really isn't there sincere reason for never making it beyond an entry level job - the real reason is just that they were too lazy to get a degree needed to pursue a better job - however they'll claim it's some kind of "moral" thing to them, just as a way to "look good" when they're really just too unmotivated to pursue the things they really want deep down. For some it really isn't believe it or not Not necessarily - for many like it isn't a 'moral issue' - some don't actually have a 'moral issue' with it, but claim to just as a cop-out for pursuing relationships that they [i[do[/i] want (because of fear of rejection, or bad luck they've had in the past).
There are sexual addictions that are also linked with mental illness, its not just those who don't fornicate regularly and are considered 'sexually repressed'. For most guys its a challenge not to fornicate because of the bombardment of temptations commercialized, so practising abstinence is a good measure of a man. Macdonald's sandwich makers are not this 'beta male' because of their employment status, the corporations oppress them with not enough money to pay for college and their living expenses. 'Alpha males' have luxuries that others don't have, like wealthy families. or the "alpha males' created a new breed of women that are not attracted to Macdonald salaries,
I think you're confused about what "sexual addiction" is. lol I can't think of a more archaic word than "fornicate" - that'd be like using the term "motorcar" in the 21st century No, it's a challenge not to masturbate because of the bombardment of temptations commercialized. Even more of a challenge to actually get off your butt and meet a woman nowadays, with the abundance of free internet porn. For most guys who 'claim' such, it's not really true - they don't genuinely have an ethical problem with it (ex. in other words - if 'chick flicks' were a reality, and some smokin' hot woman just came and 'gave it' to them without them having to actually make any effort - they'd drop the "abstinence' facade in a minute). They 'claim' to feel that way, but don't and just use it as an excuse not to overcome issues holding them back from relationships that they really desire (ex. , or character flaws that make them unappealing). Which is a sign of weakness, not manliness. No one's a 'beta male' because of their employment status. Alpha/beta is a character trait - it has nothing to do with 'wealth'. But a guy who never tries to improve his income situation, and ends up still working at McDonald's into his 40s because he never applied himself to more than that is probably a beta male. Cool story bro Since you don't even know what an 'alpha male' is based on this statement, I'd refrain from continuing to make ignorant an uninformed statements about a subject which you apparently know as much about as you do quantum physics. Thanks for confirming that you're too ignorant and superficial to be worth discussing with any further - if you're really so far gone that you think being "alpha" has to do with the size of your paycheck. Hint kid - if you won the lottery right now, you wouldn't have any better luck with women than you do already - so if you sit on your butt and blame your "job at Mcdonald's" for your shortcomings with women - then that's the problem right there. I can't believe that the male sex has declined to the point that there are 'men' who actually think this way (and aren't embarrassed to come straight out and say it).