Biden administration expected to announce diplomatic boycott of Beijing Olympics this week

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Pro_Line_FL, Dec 6, 2021.

  1. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Let's read YOUR words before then, of which you are purposely leaving out.

    Yes, under the context of the federal mandates, which have yet to be implemented.

    ... and you are purposely leaving out key context, so don't make claims about my position that are incorrect.

    So, as you can see, my response that you quoted (and are misrepresenting) was specifically made within the context of the federal government mandates that we were discussing (and how the fines contained within them are effectively mandating to corporations that they cannot retain employees who refuse the "options" the government is recognizing)

    Your question about which corporations are currently being fined was made OUTSIDE OF THE CONTEXT OF THE DISCUSSION. I answered it appropriately as 'no', because SINCE THE MANDATES HAVEN'T BEEN IMPLEMENTED YET, no corporations have been issued such fines as of yet.

    But within the specific context of the mandates, then yes, the federal government IS currently fining corporations into oblivion for retaining such employees, as those fines ARE A PART OF THE FEDERAL MANDATES of which have already been announced and OSHA has already been tasked to enforce (but now various courts have placed injunctions on them).

    I must ask you at this point if you understand what context is and why it is important to maintain in a discussion??

    I made no correction, as no correction was necessary. You removed the context of federal mandates away from the discussion and are now attempting to paint me as a flip flopper when that isn't in the slightest bit true.

    1. Undergo an invasive medical procedure against my will.
    2. Undergo an invasive medical procedure against my will. This option isn't always offered, and will be removed once ol' Joe "loses his patience" again, leaving only #1.
    3. Undergo an invasive medical procedure against my will, as #2 is a requirement attached onto this option. This option isn't always offered, and will be removed once ol' Joe "loses his patience" again, leaving only #1.
    4. Attempt to find another job for an employer with under 100 employees until ol' Joe "loses his patience" again and he forces EVERY on-site employee to undergo an invasive medical procedure against their will (as is being attempted in NYC atm, and courts have intervened), leaving only #1.

    No, no choices are being offered. All that is being offered atm is extreme coercion. The only non-violent choice left at that point is civil disobedience.

    I've already explained it to you and have now done so again.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2021
  2. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    26,112
    Likes Received:
    14,201
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm sorry you struggle with this.

    So, there are 4 choices, but you just can't wrap your head around it.

    Have a nice day.
     
  3. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm likewise sorry you struggle with this.

    There is essentially only one choice (after logical and philosophical extension), but you just can't wrap your head around it.

    You too, good sir! :)
     
  4. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    26,112
    Likes Received:
    14,201
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    My co-worker chose the religious exemption path. He is now recovering from Covid. He has missed 3 weeks of work so far, and it could be another 2-3 weeks before he can work.
     
  5. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay.

    [1] Your co-worker is lucky that it was even offered to him, as it's not always being offered to people.

    [2] Your co-worker has to test on a weekly basis, right?? Which means that option #3 is really just a glorified option #2, which is an invasive medical procedure (same as option #1 is).

    Okay. So?

    Okay. So?
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2021
  6. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    26,112
    Likes Received:
    14,201
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Religious exemption? Its offered to everyone, as is medical exemption.

    No, I don't think so.
    When people start missing 5-6 weeks from work because of preventable illness, it should help you understand why many employers want to avoid the situation
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2021
  7. Jolly Penguin

    Jolly Penguin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2020
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    3,910
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The CCP cares. And as for why politicians and not athletes too? Maybe Biden only wants to flip the middle finger at China at the CCP, and not shake a fist at them. This is all symbolic after all. And the Olympics are not about sport to the CCP, but about projecting soft power and influence. It is a PR stunt for them, and this action is a dig at that.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2021
  8. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nope, those things are not being offered to everyone. A good number of people are being told to get jabbed or lose their jobs... no testing option... no religious exemption option... no medical exemption option...

    It's possible that he wouldn't, but I'd have to see it to believe it.

    When people start missing the rest of their lives from work because of preventable vaccine induced heart inflammation, it should help you understand why many employers want to avoid the situation.
     
  9. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    26,112
    Likes Received:
    14,201
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Its federal law, so yea, its offered.

    Can you name few employers who avoid asking their employees get vaccinated for such reason.

    I wish you'd stop making stuff up.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2021
  10. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    4,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Biden Regime ignores federal law (and even the constitution). It is not being offered to everyone.

    Yes.

    That's my wish about you.
     

Share This Page