Biden endorses Wall and rages against illegal immigration in 2006

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by ricmortis, Apr 27, 2020.

  1. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now THAT is friggin funny. I asked you, earleir, to present verifiable factual evidence of your claims, to which you continually don't provide and now you want ME to provide you with links? You do realize that is what is known as HYPOCRISY, right? I'll make a deal with you. When you provide me links I will be happy to do the same in return. Deal?
     
  2. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The type of information you wanted is generally not available because the people who perform such acts don't want to be known. I asked for information which should be easily available.

    "Most states refusing to provide voter data to Trump election panel"
    https://thehill.com/homenews/state-...-refusing-to-provide-voter-data-to-trump-pane
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2020
  3. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    this is what your link shows...
    upload_2020-4-30_13-18-45.png

    You claimed it was easy to get a fake birth certificate, so if it's that easy you should be able to show proof.
     
  4. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  5. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
  6. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Not exactly. Take a look at Arkansas. It is somewhat typical
    Arkansas says it's received the letter and will provide publicly available information but not Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers or information about felony convictions or military status. It will provide "publicly available information". So it really did not comply.
     
  7. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Arkansas is a red state, right? :D
     
  8. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But it was listed as complying. It did not comply. right?
     
  9. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    According to the article I provided yes, Arkansas did comply. The REPUBLICAN gov of Arkansas recommended the secretary of state not release all the information, calling the panel's request too broad. He must have felt the info given was sufficient enough.
     
  10. spiritgide

    spiritgide Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2016
    Messages:
    20,270
    Likes Received:
    16,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    But back then, he still had a working brain. Times change.....
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2020
    yabberefugee and ricmortis like this.
  11. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It was not because he thought the information was "sufficient enough". There were too many complaints about violations of privacy. The complaints are valid. However, that is not complying. For whatever reasons, valid or not valid, a complete investigation could not be done and that was my point.
     
  12. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not sure why you think a complete investigation wasn’t done. According to the article I sent you Arkansas did comply. But I get it...you only believe what has been spoonfed you
     
  13. ricmortis

    ricmortis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2018
    Messages:
    3,684
    Likes Received:
    2,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Biden never evolved. He follows whatver pattern the DNC forces him to follow.
     
    yabberefugee likes this.
  14. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You own link said Arkansas did not provide Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers or information about felony convictions or military status. All that information was requested. That is not complying.
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2020
  15. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    From my link

    ARKANSAS: Comply
    Arkansas says it's received the letter and will provide publicly available information but not Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers or information about felony convictions or military status.

    Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson says he recommended the secretary of state not release all the information, calling the panel's request too broad.
     
  16. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2020
  17. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ARKANSAS: Comply

    Clearly what was supplied qualified as complying
     
  18. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Clearly, they did not provide everything requested. I am not sure who you think they are complying with, but it was not Trump's panel.
     
  19. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Clearly you didn’t read the article. I can supply you with the info, I can’t read it for you as well. If you’re not going to even put in a little effort then you’re just wasting peoples’ time. If you decide to put some effort into this you will see the states that complied gave out public info but not SS numbers and other personal info, for obvious reasons. The public info given is considered as complying as the other info requested was overreaching. Again, if you can’t even give a little effort then just go away.
     
  20. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,421
    Likes Received:
    15,576
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks. My thoughts exactly.
    It was trump who turned the illegal immigration problem into a racial bigotry issue.
     
  21. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The states that "complied" did not give out SS numbers and other personal info??? I do not disagree with them not providing that information. But to claim they complied is simply not true. They were requested to provide that personal information, but did not provide it. That is not complying. However, without that information they cannot do a complete investigation.

    I believe I said that up front. Something to the effect of that they cannot do a complete investigation for obvious reasons. Those obvious reasons are privacy.
     
  22. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,366
    Likes Received:
    15,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just as expected...no effort. Goodbye
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2020
  23. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    11,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The section on Arkansas says it all.
     
  24. yabberefugee

    yabberefugee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    20,778
    Likes Received:
    9,063
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    OOOOOH Surfer Joe pulls out the "racial bigotry" card to deny the hypocritical card of Creepy Joe! Surfer and Creepy are like peas in a pod!
     

Share This Page