Biden's speech worked: Nearly 6 in 10 Americans agree MAGA is a threat to democracy

Dude, just stop. Kamala Harris held charities to raise money to bail rioters out and every top democrat supported it. CHAZ weirdos took over a police station which is a government authority and lines up directly with what a real insurrection is.

 

Every single thing you mentioned in the bold, italic, and underlined part rings true for democrats. If Biden really said that then he's even dumber than I originally thought. I mean, we literally saw the left fitting that description from 2016 to present time. Damn, Biden is ignorant.

 

Dems had complete control because the idiot McCarthy said no Republicans on the committee after Pelosi rightfully rejected Jim Jordan and Jim Banks from the committee and told McCarthy to pick 2 other people.
Both guys were in the coup mix and Jordan would most likely be called as a J6 witness which he acknowledged.
What Republicans wanted to talk about Pelosi,the Republicans that McCarthy wouldn't let be on the committee? lol[/QUOTE]
No, Democrats had complete control no matter what.

 

No, Democrats had complete control no matter what.[/QUOTE]

Nope!
In May 2021 the Homeland Security Committee put together a bipartisan committee fashioned after the 911 committee which the Republican majority rejected.
The Republicans have only themselves to blame from the get-go.

 

Any violence against the police on 1/6 is an insurrection. Most everyone rotting in DC jails is being charged with trespassing related charges because they didnt engage in any violence. They walked in the capitol and walked out without incident.

I dont equate them. BLM/ANTIFA riots lead to millions in property damage across the USA. 1/6 lead to some broken windows and damaged doors at the Capitol. 100 times more damage was done to DC in riots following Trumps arrival in DC in protest of his election. And the 3-4 hour delay of a ceremonial action in Congress is nothing compared to the BLM/ANTIFA delay in American police enforcing our criminal laws.

 

All you can talk about is the couple hundred people, out of tens of thousands, who were let into the Capitol. You must have a very short memory if you don't remember all the screaming about Clinton really winning the 2016 election, lol.

The left don't have to steal anything, they lie and steal in the wide open for all to see and their followers are too gullible to see it. I hope you're not proud of what your party has become.

 

Well for the 9/11 committee, Republicans were permitted to select their committee members. In the 1/6 committee they were not.
And in case you havent noticed, nothing has come from this 1/6 show other than some bad TV shows. I dont think Republicans are looking to blame anyone and are instead glad they are not a part of the charade.

 

Hillary C. conceded the election the night of the election. She didn't stage rallies afterwards trying to lie/claim that the election was "stolen". She didn't try to replace the actual electors with fake ones. She didn't sue to undo the election. She didn't call in militias to attack the Capitol.

Short memory? You've gone way beyond a short memory into grotesque fabrications and extremist irony.

 

The 911 committee had an equal amount of Reps and Dems with a Republican Chairman

Republicans were certainly permitted to pick their J6 Committee members just not those who would most likely be called to testify, like Jordan and Banks.

Trump is blaming McCarthy for no Republicans on the committee and when Trump blames someone all his little soldiers step in line, so you're wrong there too.

Lots have come out of the J6..like the DOJ doing their own J6 investigation and they just handed out 40ish more subpoenas.

The majority of Americans are for charging Trump & Co. for his/their roll in the capital riots/fake electors and that was before his theft of thousands of government documents and the Mar a largo search warrant became the latest investigation he's under.

 

THE DIFFERENCE IS OUR BILL OF RIGHTS. REMEMBER THIS WHEN THE AUTHORITARIANS ATTACK OUR BILL OF RIGHTS.

Disturbing: UK arrests multiple protesters for speaking out against the monarchy. “I was arrested today in #Oxford after I voiced my opposition to the proclamation of ‘#CharlesIII‘. Can we be arrested simply for expressing an opinion in public? I was arrested under the Police Bill passed earlier this year. This is an outrageous assault on democracy. #NotMyKing.”

BIDEN AND TOO MANY DEMS WOULD LOVE TO CONDUCT A BLOODY CRACKDOWN ON THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENTS RATHER THAN FACE OFF IN A FREE AND FAIR ELECTION.

 

Nope!
In May 2021 the Homeland Security Committee put together a bipartisan committee fashioned after the 911 committee which the Republican majority rejected.
The Republicans have only themselves to blame from the get-go.[/QUOTE]
What Republican majority? Democrats had the majority.

 

What Republican majority? Democrats had the majority.[/QUOTE]
ffs!
The bill needed 60 votes.

 

So, in your view an assault on our government with the expressed objective of overturning our democracy and killing the VP isn't an insurrection???

BUT, a demonstration at a police station IS an insurrection???

 

ffs!
The bill needed 60 votes.[/QUOTE]
???

The comment was about the majority of Republicans. That doesn't imply there there was an overall Republican majority in congress.

 

Lol, could you be any more dramatic?

 

???

The comment was about the majority of Republicans. That doesn't imply there there was an overall Republican majority in congress.[/QUOTE]

Thank you!

 

Horseshit!

 

I just want it known that you somehow screwed up your quoting.

I did NOT say the "ffs" comment or claim that 60 votes were needed for something.

Please be more careful with your claims of what people said.

 

I just stated facts.

Sorry if they touched a nerve.

 

I cleaned up the post.

It was quite obvious that I thanked you for clarifying what my Republican majority reference meant.
Or did you not say that either?

"The comment was about the majority of Republicans. That doesn't imply there there was an overall Republican majority in congress."[/QUOTE]


"Thank you!"

 

"Thank you!"[/QUOTE]
And, thank you. I do that, too. No problem!

 

A RAPE VICTIM DOESN'T HAVE TO CARRY IT TO TERM. WHY. WHEN REPORTING THE RAPE, SHE IS TAKEN TO A HOSPITAL TO GATHER DNA EVIDENCE ON THE ATTACKER. AT THE SAME TIME. NO ONE CAN SAY THE EGG HAS BEEN FERTILIZED AT THAT TIME. SO LEGALLY IN ALL STATES SHE CAN BE CLEANED OUT, SO NO PREGNANCY CAN HAPPEN.

 

You don't have to apologize. The only nerve you touched was the one connected to my funny bone.

 

The DOJ investigation didnt come out of the 1/6 Committee. And they just handed out 4o subpoenas, more than a year and a half after the fact because they ae desperate to find a crime they havent found yet.

 

Only a percentage of rapes are reported.

There are many who are not willing to consent to that kind of invasive treatment after such an assault.

And, your idea for preventing pregnancy is ridiculous. There is a reason that is not proposed as a way to prevent pregnancy.