Billy the Bagman implicates Don in another impeachable offense.

well same goes for the leftist on this site, so we are all busting a gut 24/7/365

 

And that would be FACTUALLY ACCURATE

 

He sure found evidence against Manafort, Flynn, Cohen and others. And WRONG, he did find tons of evidence of Trump officials cavorting with Russian crooks and spies. (Read volume 1 of the Mueller report) However he said there was not ENOUGH evidence to prosecute at this time for conspiracy. That’s different. In volume 2 he points out 10 incidents of obvious obstruction of justice against Trump himself, but DOJ policy prevents him from charging a sitting president with federal crimes. (Read Volume 2 of Mueller Report)

The US Congress has every right to investigate and call whatever witnesses cited in the report or anyone else they deem helpful regarding their investigation. Any attempts by Trump, Barr or anyone else to tamper with witnesses or block their investigation in any way is a clear cut case of obstruction. Trump and Barr are digging themselves deeper just like Nixon and Mitchell did.

And I don’t give a rat’s ass if they arrest, indict and prosecute HC. She hasn’t held a government position since 2012. Now we are dealing with a possible/probable crook in the White House right now. Stick to the subject.

The weather is great here in LA (as usual). I think I will cruise down to Malibu to catch some waves before sunset and get some dinner and drinks on the deck at Gladstone’s while the sun sinks into the Pacific. Thanks for asking.

 

You mean like dangling pardons in front of witnesses? You mean like refusing to testify for Mueller (Donnie J and Don)? You mean like the 10 examples of obstruction cited in Mueller's report including efforts to fire Mueller, efforts to curtail Mueller, conduct towards Manafort (cooperation), telling McGahn to create a false document, and conduct towards Manafort (influencing jury)?

 

The actual answer, a lack of chargeable crimes.

 

It is a testament to the effectiveness of Billy the Bagman's duplicity, right wing media distortion, the Liar-in-Chief's lies, and the gullibility of the minions that we are debating things that are factually settled. Mueller did not exonerate Trump on obstruction. Mueller's report contains ample evidence for Congress to convict Don of obstruction.

 

So the GOP controlled DOJ lets her skate...out of kindness, I suppose....Right...lol...I guess being a Clinton is cryptonite to you guys tin foil suits so ya just can’t git er. You guys are a riot. She’s an old broad who has been in politics for 45 years...She isn’t after you guys, I promise.

 

Well let me simply off this "While his hag was under investigation"

Ya that should clear up any confusion you might have had with Bonnie an Clyde

 

The question about not indicting Clinton is easy to answer. Not indicting her allows deluded Trumpists to sustain the completely unsubstantiated belief she is guilty of a crime. If she were to be charged, and inevitably found innocent, Trumpists and Trump himself would lose the opportunity to keep repeating a favorite meme. It's better for Repubs if they keep Trumpists feeling aggrieved so they can make the specious claim Hillary is above the law as a rationalization for allowing Trump to be.

 

Aggravated felony tarmac talking:

Arizona Tinfoil Criminal Code187.5

Punishable by up to 10 years in prison listening and watching nothing but Rush and Hannity.

 

If she were acquitted these imbeciles would just say the jury was composed of deep State illegal aliens.

 

See, just like I said! She was a Clinton

 

I heard “people are saying” that there is evidence that during that horrible tarmac incident that Hillary was actually communicating directly with Lynch via her secret deep State decoder watch which was made with the uranium she has stockpiled in her back yard in Chapaqua. Bill “Luca Fatzi” Barr is all over it like stink on a monkey. She is going down!

 

Why do you keep referring to the lying sack of crap Comey for????

Heck, just weeks before the 2016 election, you left-wingers were calling for Comey's firing for re-opening the Hillary Email investigation and now you love him.

LMFAO!

 

Exactly. I wrote this one another thread.
....................................................................................
What's more, they have created a construct whereby they can rationalize refusing to accept the truth. How? Let's take my link as an example. It quotes Comey, who led the investigation in to Hillary's emails. By necessity he has been tarnished by the Liar-in-Chief so they get to dismiss anything he says.......no matter how factual. Where does the link come from? The construct has that covered too. It comes from the "fake news" media. So again, no matter that what is reported is factual the construct gives them the permission they need to deny the facts.

The same thing is playing out with Mueller's report. Many Trumpists keep posting things about the report that are the exact opposite of the facts. How? They eschew reality in favor of right wing media lies because Faux has convinced them everyone else lies but Faux..............WHEN THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE.
......................................................................................
The construct works perfectly for them. They make a ridiculous claim.......we provide factual evidence to refute it..........they deny the truth by claiming the source is biased, fake, part of the deep state, is a leftist, they have dozens of terms they use to dismiss reality in favor of a fantasy world of right wing media's creation.

 

Oh come on! We all know Slick Willie was probably dipping his willy in to some smooth pink and stink.. I'm sure it had nothing to do with old dried up Hillyhag

 

Because they know how badly it went for them when they tried it with Clinton.

 

I referred to former FBI Director Comey because he is the one who was in charge of the email investigation. Just because you and other Trump cultists have been trashing him does not make it true. The guy was a lifelong law enforcement official who rose to top levels because of his solid record. I am not a left winger, nor did I ever call for his firing.

I notice that as usual, you did not refute any of the facts I pointed out but rather responded with a half witted attack on Comey which was non responsive to say the least. You are just pounding away on your keyboard slinging poo champ.

 

Maybe, but it sure isn’t any of my business nor yours and frankly that’s a pretty ugly vision. Why are you guys so fixated on an old broad who hasn’t help public office for over 6 years?

 

Non of the following are Trump supporters...

 

You mean unless it's about Trump and say, Stormy? Then what, you make an exception

But to your question, because Hillyhag and Slick are two very fine example of corruption, REAL corruption

 

You noticed this too? Is this not "the story" of our political divide?

 

Everybody is entitled to their opinion. But don’t hang it on me. Officially, Comey was fired for overstepping his territory and trashing Clinton leading up to the election, at least that’s what Rosenstein said in his letter. Comey’s actions definitely helped Trump squeak out narrow victory’s in a few states which gave him the election. Why do Trump and all his howling monkeys hate him? Trump obviously and admittedly fired Comey after Comey helped him for not quashing the Russia investigation.

 

Complete BS! That's purely your personal opinion.

 

I do not care if Trump screws possibly infected sluts while his wife is at home pregnant, but it sure should be drummed into all the Bible thumping nit wits as a political ploy by anyone running against him. To not do it would be political malpractice.