IMO the colour of the skin of the criminal is irrelevant to the media report, it does not make the crime any better or worse .. however, if the skin colour is going to be reported it should be equally reported no matter what the skin colour is.
That depends on the specific White, doesn't it? This is about logic and not emotionalism. Not even Barack Obama's domestic spying programs can even yet know all there is to know about any individual, about the things they go through on a daily basis and so the claim that no Whites have suffered discrimination comparable to the average Black is logically . . . wrong.
I cannot recall reports of white kids ransacking Walmart of bumrushing movie theaters, but if you have any links, I will be glad to look at them.
what about murdering black people in walmart and murdering innocents in movie theatres? we know whites do that. the darknight shooting and the guy gunned down while on his cell phone to his wife.
However far back the designation of White can go . . . that is if one is a student of history. So yes much, MUCH farther back than a mere 400 years. What in the hell IS being taught in today's public school systems anyway? It obviously isn't history.
Irrelevant to the point I am making or are you suggesting that white kids don't commit crimes? If you are not, then please do link to a report where the headline mentions that the criminal was white. Here is one for you, notice they don't mention that the cop is white (or any other colour) in the headline, though the skin colour of the victim is mentioned (again why?) - http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/frank-ernest-shepherd-police-shoot-5527099
Are leftists now claiming that ONLY slavery is discrimination? Well fine then please present living U.S. citizens who have been enslaved. Gasp! It can't be done. So now we go back to discrimination being just discrimination rather than being linked to slavery which doesn't even exist inside the United States of America. What a drag, eh?
The fact that evil knows no color boundaries. The color of the perpetrator is irrelevant. It is not the color of the person we should be focused on, but the acts themselves. Unfortunately we are caught in a "blame game" quota that is downright stupid. Nice try, but the last time I looked your Commander in Chief, members of congress, generals, pilots, and all supporting roles in the US Military come from every race. Like it or not, black people are part of the problem and are now inside the system, you can no longer blame white people for the direction this country takes. Besides, when we don't get involved in conflicts, we are demonized as a country. When we DO get involved, we also get demonized. And yeah, that includes you, welcome to the club.
Actually you don't know squat. Patrice was a third rate communist agitator who lasted just a few weeks. He would have been just as bad as the rest. And please do tell how Whites STOLE anything. Would it be like when Robert Mugabe stole his country blind? Whites left behind schools, hospitals, roads and education. Now the place is a cesspool. You see I've spent a bit of time there. Simply unbelievable corruption. I knew it was Friday, because I could smell the sorghum beer brewing and ganja and knew somebody was going to come in and ask for ice. A total 3 day drunk for everybody. Some of the stuff was just incredible. Life was dirt cheap and they made it that way. I bet you have no idea of what they like to do to albinos. I can't tell you what some government rangers had planned for some Zambian poachers who were crossing the border. It was OK for them but not for the Zambians. You have no idea of what you're talking about. NADA.
Equal reporting status? What sort of liberal nonsense is that? The FBI UCR is stratified with just two basic groups, Blacks and Whites while lumping in Hispanics with Whites just so the data won't look so bad.
They do not mention the race of the offenders in the OP linked headline either. It is the OP who made the observation, not the media. If my comment is irrelvant to your point, then perhaps you should make your point instead of asking people questions hoping they will make it for you.
Or finding a random black to run over like James Craig Anderson. I'm sure some on here condone it, so hey.
You are missing the point .. That point being how does the skin colour of a person committing a crime mean anything in a MEDIA report? I have said nothing about the FBI's UCR. so the question, which you have avoided like the plague so far, remains.
I have made my point numerous times .. but just for you, here it is again, a direct copy from my first comment, in case you missed it. - Post #2
It is I'm not condoning . . . Not "I condoning". Slip of the finger I'm sure. Bulls in china closets. I'm sure if white youths ransacked a Walmart, the picture would be in every newspaper, and on every television station. White youths don't do this kind of thing. Yeah, a few of theme go nuts and commit mass murder when they read about the Newsome and Christian murders, the black-on-white crime statistics. Whoever shot the nine blacks is a psychopath. On the other hand, there were 13 people killed in Chicago the 4th of July weekend. No one is calling thatt a mass murder though. Funny isn't it?
Great, then I hope you will be advocating for media reports to headline the skin colour when they report on white crimes.
Please the MSM goes nuts every time a shooter is White. Not so much when they're Black. Of course the brutha's shoot each other wholesale and they're not a novelty.
I honesty wish they would, so everyone could shut up about it. The travesty is that what color someone is, or that the color is reported or not, seems to be more of an issue than the actual crimes.
You've got to be kidding. Get some help. Where do you think most violent crime comes from. NRA conventions? Liberalism is insanity.
