Bogus Fast N' Furious Factoid Backfires: Call for More Gun Regulation

I just love that you can STILL find ways to blame Bush for things. Its quite a remarkable skill.

 

LOL, you sure do try hard.....

ROFL

 

Trust me, it doesn't take skill.

 

What could he possibly still be doing to hurt our country? You blame him for some of the things that obama did because they were "policies that were already started or put into place during the Bush admin." Ok, maybe in 1 or 2 cases that is true. If they were so bad, why did Obama go through with them? So Bush is to blame for things he may have started, but Obama definitely finished?

 

What the heck is a "meme" and how do you pronounce it? Not in my dictionary here at home, so I'd guess it is another one of those made up rap or internet type words?

Think I'll start making up words from now on too.

 

See that is the problem, too many Americans accept that there are those in our society to be held above the law.

Particularly among the DNC.

 

It is a word made up by Richard Dawkins. Someone on 4chan (the bowels of the internet) used the word and then every adolescent mouth-breather on 4chan picked it up and are now prone to use the word in every other sentence. It's good, it makes them easy to spot.

 

It's wonderfully ironic that the fake Fast and Furious controversy, ginned up by Fox and the Rightwing Noise Machine, and adroitly handled by Holder by showing it was a Bush-era fiasco, has emboldened antigun activists and resulted in renewed forceful calls for more gun regulation at the borders.

I would like to know how you would answer for the "ginned up" death of that border patrol agent. Perhaps you could explain to that man's widow and children how he was relegated to "ginned up" status.

 

Landru, you are useless, mindless drone of the liberal ideology. I find it repugnant that someone would openly support Fast & Furious and push for more assaults against the 2nd Amendment. Part of me says it is slightly treasonous for anyone to advocate crimes against this founding document, but the other side feels sorry and pities you.

 

It's "wonderfully ironic" that your posts are so utterly clueless, so much of the time.

We understood that the ORIGINAL INTENT of the Obama Adm.'s gunrunning to Mexican drug gangs was TO CAUSE GREATER RESTRICTION OF AMERICANS' 2nd Amendment rights, FROM THE GITGO.

Notice that your own link is titled "As predicted.." etc. Der.....

Way to "keep up".....NOT.

 

OK, I don't see any mention of a plan to sell guns to the drug Cartels, can you point it out to me? It happened under Obama and Holder.

 

AMEN Brother!

 

I don't know what you're talking about; bowels of the internet???

 

I'm sure you missed this in an earlier post...

What part of the operation was terminated in Oct 2007 don't you understand? That would mean someone in the Obama administration would have had to given the order to restart it. 2 things indicate to me the OK came from the top: 1) The fact that it could create an international incident would need the highest levels of approval. 2) The complete lack of transparency by all levels of the Obama administration. If they've done nothing wrong, then they should have no problem with laying it all out there.

I'm always willing to help.

 

Oops you took that the wrong way...LOL

 

Honest question:

Citizens can legally purchase as many firearms of any type as they want. This shouldn't necessarily change, due to the 2A.
If a citizen legally purchases those firearms, and transports them legally, there is no legal standing to stop them from doing so.
A crime is only committed if those firearms are knowingly supplied to criminals.

If the only crime is occurring outside the US, what do you expect the US to do about it?
Given our laws, what could the ATF (or any other US agency) have legally done without violating the 2A?
What does any of this have to do with Obama, given that he had nothing to do with the criminals or the establishment of the laws that enabled this to occur?